Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:09 am

If I'm honest with everyone

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:11 am

:oops:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:12 am

Couldn't disagree more......

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:24 am

... has your keyboard one of these?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:32 am

Mel, you didn't post this after we beat Man City and we've only lost by one goal in the last two games.

There's a long way to go.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:34 am

Sack Mackay because our second string lost 3-2 to west ham. :laughing5:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:42 am

fair play, there are some f*cking idiots who post on this board! :lol:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:47 am

What a Tit surely your a Jack Troll

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:01 am

Ahh I see the muppets back.Things must be a bit slow on here-One of Annis' best fishermen along with Leedsservicecrew and Roathmagic.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:02 am

He's never liked Malky.
Not even when we were cruising at the top of the Championship last year.
Either a troll or does not know much about football.

Quite clearly we should be battling for champions league, hey Angelis? :roll:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:09 am

What a moron! :lol:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:18 am

Shut up you tart. 17th place this season will be a success and we all know it.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:28 am

100% agree.

Malky is unfortunately out of his depth at this level and I say that as an admirer of the man but sometimes you have to let your head rule your heart. When you've had nearly 100 shots against you in 5 games then you know that your team is not doing very well in terms of coping.

West Ham - 18 shots against us
Man City - 16 shots against us
Everton - 13 shots against us
Hull City - 18 shots against us
Spurs - 29 shots against us

Grand total = 95.

If we continue that on average this season that would be 722 shots against us this season with an average of 19 per game. That is terrible and at this level you are going to lose points massively if you are letting the opposition have 19 shots on average.

His defensive style is bringing wave after wave of attack upon us and its putting immense pressure upon our defence who rarely get any time to rest.

Yes we have conceded only 6 goals in 5 games and there have been no drubbings but its clear to see to anyone that things don't look good. Malky also is very stubborn and definitely as the OP has pointed out, favourites. This is totally wrong and he should be playing those who deserve it on merit, not those who fit his ethos only.

5 points from a possible 15 is 1/3 and unfortunately if we continue this trend then we are more than likely going back down with 38 points.

Some of our fans are simply deluded. They say 'we cant expect to beat Spurs but we'll pick up points against the lower sides' but they are forgetting these lower sides most of them are still a lot better than us. Sunderland is no easy place to go for a club like us, neither is Newcastle, neither is Norwich, neither is Palace. The truth is, there are no easy games and to just say 'oh well we'll pick up points elsewhere' on a whim as if its some easy feat is ridiculous.

Neil Warnock played a very similar style at QPR in taking them up. Rugged, compact and winning by very close margins. They went back down. Lessons to be learned. Inviting pressure upon yourselves in this league will get you punished plain and simple, the players are vastly more talented. I dread to think what RVP will do to us if he's fit when Man Utd play us.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:33 am

Barnett, your constant swapping and changing and blatant trolling is making a mockery of this board, not to mention yourself.

I used to think you were odd but intelligent. Now I just think you are an attention seeking child.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:35 am

I'm not going to slate you for this post. I do understand your concerns but I'm afraid I do not share them. I think we should wait & see what unfolds at the home games & a few of the away games against the "lesser" teams. If we do use the same tactics & methods at the likes of Fulham away then I think it would be a cause for concern. But nowhere near to the level your insisting. It's far to early for you to panic.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:38 am

JBCCFC1927 wrote:100% agree.

Malky is unfortunately out of his depth at this level and I say that as an admirer of the man but sometimes you have to let your head rule your heart. When you've had nearly 100 shots against you in 5 games then you know that your team is not doing very well in terms of coping.

West Ham - 18 shots against us
Man City - 16 shots against us
Everton - 13 shots against us
Hull City - 18 shots against us
Spurs - 29 shots against us

Grand total = 95.

If we continue that on average this season that would be 722 shots against us this season with an average of 19 per game. That is terrible and at this level you are going to lose points massively if you are letting the opposition have 19 shots on average.

His defensive style is bringing wave after wave of attack upon us and its putting immense pressure upon our defence who rarely get any time to rest.

Yes we have conceded only 6 goals in 5 games and there have been no drubbings but its clear to see to anyone that things don't look good. Malky also is very stubborn and definitely as the OP has pointed out, favourites. This is totally wrong and he should be playing those who deserve it on merit, not those who fit his ethos only.

5 points from a possible 15 is 1/3 and unfortunately if we continue this trend then we are more than likely going back down with 38 points.

Some of our fans are simply deluded. They say 'we cant expect to beat Spurs but we'll pick up points against the lower sides' but they are forgetting these lower sides most of them are still a lot better than us. Sunderland is no easy place to go for a club like us, neither is Newcastle, neither is Norwich, neither is Palace. The truth is, there are no easy games and to just say 'oh well we'll pick up points elsewhere' on a whim as if its some easy feat is ridiculous.

Neil Warnock played a very similar style at QPR in taking them up. Rugged, compact and winning by very close margins. They went back down. Lessons to be learned. Inviting pressure upon yourselves in this league will get you punished plain and simple, the players are vastly more talented. I dread to think what RVP will do to us if he's fit when Man Utd play us.


100% disagree. 4 points at home against Man City, Everton and Spurs, who all came in the top 6 last season is excellent. A large percentage of these shots against us are hopeful, long range efforts as we are organised and defend well to not give away any clear cut chances. If we play more open and attacking, we will get smashed by the better teams in this division. We conceded 3 at West Ham last night playing 4-4-2 and Spurs battering Villa last night shows we did very well to nearly nick a point from them, and Malky should take credit for being seconds away from making that happen. We cannot go out and attack teams who have superior quality to us, we're not Barcelona!

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:41 am

angelis49 wrote:I call upon Tan to sack Mackay without delay.....when i see Mackay,i see a manager totally out of his depth,in my view he is not experience enough to be able to keep us in the Premiership,his lack of tactical ability,which he was able to get away with in the Championship,will not hack it at this level,his inability to get his team to play the full 90 minutes competitively is alarming,his use of substitutions is still one of his many short comings,his willingness to have all ten of our players back to defend a corner kick,is in my view demonstrates his siege mentality,which is fine when your playing one of the top 5 teams,but i fear he will still be ultra defensive when we play so called lesser teams,possibly loosing us valuable points at the end of the day,he is still to loyal to some of his players,who clearly are not up to Premiership standard(i think you know the players in question),he will continue to select them in front of other better equipped players we have in our squad,also Mackay is a manager who will revert to type and get his players to play hoof ball,which is a tactic totally out of place in the Premiership,i think a study was done recently where it was found,out of all the other Premiership teams,including Palace,Hull and Stoke,we played the long ball game more than any other team in the league,in essence he is still,very much a Championship Manager,we need someone right now with Premiership experience,we can not afford to wait for Mackay to gain that experience,if in fact he is able to, i strongly believe that our owner,who has invested millions of pounds in our club,will not sit on his hands for ever and watch Mackay wreck his investment,so l appeal to Tan to get rid of Mackay sooner than later before he inflicts more damage on our hopes of staying in this division



you have give 1 or 2 good points but the rest well, :laughing5: :laughing5:

with-out him we`d still be a championship club, so im my eyes he should get time to prove him self

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:53 am

I've finally realised this spastic has to be on a wind-up. Nobody could be that consistently retarded, even for this board

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:55 am

CityGent wrote:I've finally realised this spastic has to be on a wind-up. Nobody could be that consistently retarded, even for this board


:lol: :lol:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:58 am

You are stupid as f**k. Malky is doing fine.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:01 pm

aderynglas wrote:You are stupid as f**k. Malky is doing fine.


He can't read or write properly. Being an uneducated critic of our wonderful manager should be the least of his worries

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:02 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:Barnett, your constant swapping and changing and blatant trolling is making a mockery of this board, not to mention yourself.

I used to think you were odd but intelligent. Now I just think you are an attention seeking child.


Because I disagree with you Craig? I don't think I'm the child here. I seriously believe he's out of his depth. Only time will tell and I hope Malky decides to start using different tactics but I cant see him doing it and it will cost us points.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:04 pm

Good to see he's edited his post with some truth at last

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:05 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Barnett, your constant swapping and changing and blatant trolling is making a mockery of this board, not to mention yourself.

I used to think you were odd but intelligent. Now I just think you are an attention seeking child.


Because I disagree with you Craig? I don't think I'm the child here. I seriously believe he's out of his depth. Only time will tell and I hope Malky decides to start using different tactics but I cant see him doing it and it will cost us points.


If we played more open and attacking against Man City, we would have lost. If we played more open and attacking against Everton, we would have lost. Malky has won us 4 points from these 2 games with his tactics.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:07 pm

CraigCCFC wrote:Barnett, your constant swapping and changing and blatant trolling is making a mockery of this board, not to mention yourself.

I used to think you were odd but intelligent. Now I just think you are an attention seeking child.


Its a shame he cant just give his honest opinion instead of all this nonsense he comes out with for attention.

Who gives a crap about the amount of shots, its goals that count and we have conceed very few against very good teams.

As for the OP :roll:

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:08 pm

Tonteg Bluebird wrote:If we played more open and attacking against Man City, we would have lost. If we played more open and attacking against Everton, we would have lost. Malky has won us 4 points from these 2 games with his tactics.


You can't say that for certain as you don't know. Plenty of teams have played open against the likes of Everton, WBA being one, and have beat them.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:09 pm

Apart from the 3 teams we have played then only Man U , Liverpool , Chelsea , Arsenal and Swansea remain a threat at home and Im sure Malky will adopt the same tactics against them ...... its the likes of Newcastle up next and the others in the Prem League where we may see a totally different approach to tactics for home games ??

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:10 pm

Sad some can't handle the truth of the matter. Our fan base has always been extreme.

Dave Jones - boring, terrible in the media, no plan B.

Malky - will keep us up and excellent tactics.

Theres never any middle ground with our fans and unfortunately they are not seeing Malky's blatant flaws. Its a shame.

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:11 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:If we played more open and attacking against Man City, we would have lost. If we played more open and attacking against Everton, we would have lost. Malky has won us 4 points from these 2 games with his tactics.


You can't say that for certain as you don't know. Plenty of teams have played open against the likes of Everton, WBA being one, and have beat them.


Oh dear god! If you honestly think we would have done better than take 4 points from Man City and Everton if we played a more attacking system, I give up!

Re: Sack Mackay

Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:11 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:Barnett, your constant swapping and changing and blatant trolling is making a mockery of this board, not to mention yourself.

I used to think you were odd but intelligent. Now I just think you are an attention seeking child.


Because I disagree with you Craig? I don't think I'm the child here. I seriously believe he's out of his depth. Only time will tell and I hope Malky decides to start using different tactics but I cant see him doing it and it will cost us points.

Tactics were fine against 3 of last seasons top 6, so much so we only lost because of a 93rd minute goal. How would you play them? Open, attacking and get a hammering?...we cannot outplay the biggest teams.

Last week you were slating people for the very opinion you are now spouting as gospel, I cant understand how you change your mind on a variety of subjects so frequently.