Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:19 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:21 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:22 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Common sense at last mate. 100% spot on. Robbed of a point if not more. Who knows how the game would have unfolded had our goal had been rightfully awarded.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:25 pm
TheTrueBlue7 wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:Common sense at last mate. 100% spot on. Robbed of a point if not more. Who knows how the game would have unfolded had our goal had been rightfully awarded.
exactly! i think if our goal stood we would had gone on and got a second at points spurs couldn't handle us of the attack and resorted to slowing play by fouling ect, The officials should hang their heads in shame appalling performance.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:40 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:46 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:46 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:47 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:48 pm
TheBluebirdsMovement wrote:Clattenburg laps up the hype he gets from the media, I remember him smirking away at a decision. f*cking diabolical, we clearly stopped for a free kick as well yet played advantage? Lino on the side of the Ninian was f*cking dreadful too
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:53 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:54 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Talking shit Spurs battered us. Couldnt unlock us be fucked they got behind us countless times and but for Marshalls heroics that could have been a heavy defeat.
Luckily these games against the big 6 wont decide our fate.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:55 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:56 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Talking shit Spurs battered us. Couldnt unlock us be fucked they got behind us countless times and but for Marshalls heroics that could have been a heavy defeat.
Luckily these games against the big 6 wont decide our fate.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:57 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:58 pm
TheTrueBlue7 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Talking shit Spurs battered us. Couldnt unlock us be fucked they got behind us countless times and but for Marshalls heroics that could have been a heavy defeat.
Luckily these games against the big 6 wont decide our fate.
gotta disagree Polo i think we looked sharp going forward in parts just the final ball and not taking our chances not really a battering
Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:59 pm
Scruffy wrote:Clattenburg was a wanker but Spurs were clearly the better team and Marshall kept us in it. We really need to improve attacking wise, we only really looked like scoring when Odemwingie came on.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:00 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Scruffy wrote:Clattenburg was a wanker but Spurs were clearly the better team and Marshall kept us in it. We really need to improve attacking wise, we only really looked like scoring when Odemwingie came on.
Sense at last
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:01 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Scruffy wrote:Clattenburg was a wanker but Spurs were clearly the better team and Marshall kept us in it. We really need to improve attacking wise, we only really looked like scoring when Odemwingie came on.
Sense at last
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:03 pm
Scruffy wrote:Clattenburg was a wanker but Spurs were clearly the better team and Marshall kept us in it. We really need to improve attacking wise, we only really looked like scoring when Odemwingie came on.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:08 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Scruffy wrote:Clattenburg was a wanker but Spurs were clearly the better team and Marshall kept us in it. We really need to improve attacking wise, we only really looked like scoring when Odemwingie came on.
Sense at last
Spurs were but Marshall is still part of the defence. The final part and they couldn't unlock him. Sorry but the aim is to score. We did it and had a goal chalked off, they did it and it stood. The game isn't create as many chances as possible and not score. If it was then Spurs would have had the game wrapped up first half.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:10 pm
TheTrueBlue7 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Scruffy wrote:Clattenburg was a wanker but Spurs were clearly the better team and Marshall kept us in it. We really need to improve attacking wise, we only really looked like scoring when Odemwingie came on.
Sense at last
im not saying we were better than spurs but we put up a good fight to say the least just robbed by a shit ref
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:11 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:We didnt have a shot on target
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:16 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:We didnt have a shot on target
...apart from the goal that was wrongfully not given. Lets not let shit decisions get in the way of facts.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:48 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:54 pm
Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:27 pm
llan bluebird wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2224576/Mark-Clattenburg--controversial-referee.html
2009 Mark Hughes and his coaching staff were furious with him over comments he allegedly made about Craig Bellamy when he played for Manchester City against Bolton.
Bellamy had been his usual voluble self during the first half and was later sent off by Clattenburg for a second yellow card during a tempestuous Premier League clash.
According to accounts at the time, the Durham-born referee asked the City bench: ‘How do you put up with Bellamy?’
Hughes was incensed that an official would appear to jeopardise his impartiality by making comments about one of his players.
Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:32 pm
TheTrueBlue7 wrote:llan bluebird wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2224576/Mark-Clattenburg--controversial-referee.html
2009 Mark Hughes and his coaching staff were furious with him over comments he allegedly made about Craig Bellamy when he played for Manchester City against Bolton.
Bellamy had been his usual voluble self during the first half and was later sent off by Clattenburg for a second yellow card during a tempestuous Premier League clash.
According to accounts at the time, the Durham-born referee asked the City bench: ‘How do you put up with Bellamy?’
Hughes was incensed that an official would appear to jeopardise his impartiality by making comments about one of his players.
bellamy should have nutted the c**t
Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:42 pm