MAN CITY,S QWNERS

heavy investment and not a rebrand in sight.

heavy investment and not a rebrand in sight.

If you had a £100m to invest then I would listen but until then this whole thing is boring. Lets just get on and enjoy the season in the top flight. Please god we don't go straight back down but if we do you have seen how hard it is to recover!

heavy investment and not a rebrand in sight.

Now that's a revelation

Can think of 20 odd billion reasons why didn't need to rebrand! Can't think of one why this posts been made!

Can think of 20 odd billion reasons why didn't need to rebrand! Can't think of one why this posts been made!

perhaps to highlight how a foreign owner can embrace a clubs history,traditions and identity.pretty sure the man city fellow has used his own dollar too not loaned it to you.

Can think of 20 odd billion reasons why didn't need to rebrand! Can't think of one why this posts been made!

perhaps to highlight how a foreign owner can embrace a clubs history,traditions and identity.pretty sure the man city fellow has used his own dollar too not loaned it to you.

Like said they are worth £20billion do they need to borrow money? tan needed to do something to increase revenue to get his investment back? Unfortunately he saw re brand as the option to achieve this! Slightly different positions are man c to us don't you think?
Mind you man c owners could be richer than £20B

Can think of 20 odd billion reasons why didn't need to rebrand! Can't think of one why this posts been made!

perhaps to highlight how a foreign owner can embrace a clubs history,traditions and identity.pretty sure the man city fellow has used his own dollar too not loaned it to you.

Like said they are worth £20billion do they need to borrow money? tan needed to do something to increase revenue to get his investment back? Unfortunately he saw re brand as the option to achieve this! Slightly different positions are man c to us don't you think?
Mind you man c owners could be richer than £20B

the point being al that they didn,t go in and smash their identity .tan would know all along what his plan was so it wasn,t about saving ccfc. long term he is creating a club/team that has his own interests at heart not the fans of ccfc.cardiff dragons next stop i fear.it,s fair to say that the shiek ain,t signing on while he is manchester though

Can think of 20 odd billion reasons why didn't need to rebrand! Can't think of one why this posts been made!

perhaps to highlight how a foreign owner can embrace a clubs history,traditions and identity.pretty sure the man city fellow has used his own dollar too not loaned it to you.

Like said they are worth £20billion do they need to borrow money? tan needed to do something to increase revenue to get his investment back? Unfortunately he saw re brand as the option to achieve this! Slightly different positions are man c to us don't you think?
Mind you man c owners could be richer than £20B

the point being al that they didn,t go in and smash their identity .tan would know all along what his plan was so it wasn,t about saving ccfc. long term he is creating a club/team that has his own interests at heart not the fans of ccfc.cardiff dragons next stop i fear.it,s fair to say that the shiek ain,t signing on while he is manchester though

Ok tan didn't save city from the courts ect ect, why would the sheikhs need to do anything? Man c huge compared to us! We all know why tan has done what he as done. So haven't a clue what you getting at other than a dig at tan! Ffs change your record, I'm out of this post don't do one sided conversations!

JTC, the re-brand is pathetic, but sadly we basically had to go along with it otherwise we may not have had a club.

This re-brand has changed everything for certain fans, some fans have stopped going all together. (Including myself until we change back to blue, hate to say it but it dont seem the same club).

Can think of 20 odd billion reasons why didn't need to rebrand! Can't think of one why this posts been made!

perhaps to highlight how a foreign owner can embrace a clubs history,traditions and identity.pretty sure the man city fellow has used his own dollar too not loaned it to you.

Like said they are worth £20billion do they need to borrow money? tan needed to do something to increase revenue to get his investment back? Unfortunately he saw re brand as the option to achieve this! Slightly different positions are man c to us don't you think?
Mind you man c owners could be richer than £20B

the point being al that they didn,t go in and smash their identity .tan would know all along what his plan was so it wasn,t about saving ccfc. long term he is creating a club/team that has his own interests at heart not the fans of ccfc.cardiff dragons next stop i fear.it,s fair to say that the shiek ain,t signing on while he is manchester though

Ok tan didn't save city from the courts ect ect, why would the sheikhs need to do anything? Man c huge compared to us! We all know why tan has done what he as done. So haven't a clue what you getting at other than a dig at tan! Ffs change your record, I'm out of this post don't do one sided conversations!

simple really al .proves people can buy into something and respect what has gone before them without having to change everything to their own way.tan could have still got you promotion without a colour change.surely he is wealthy enough not to have to hope he gets some money back off shirt sales in asia.?total lack of class and respect shown.unlike the city owners how have embraced their clubs history

JTC, the re-brand is pathetic, but sadly we basically had to go along with it otherwise we may not have had a club.

This re-brand has changed everything for certain fans, some fans have stopped going all together. (Including myself until we change back to blue, hate to say it but it dont seem the same club).

shane it is such a shame the way it has been done.i know a few of your lads who feel the same way you do even though they still attending.the prem masks a lot of things.a relegation with a few season in the champ and the fans will soon drop off.my team lost a fair few thousand after only a few seasons back in the champ.tbf we have a owner who cannot leave hong kong which doesn,t help funny enough he spent a load of money on the back of prem survival and well you know the rest.

Errmmm. Im fairly sure they renamed the stadium tye ethiad stadium. Type of rebranding right there.

JTC, the re-brand is pathetic, but sadly we basically had to go along with it otherwise we may not have had a club.

This re-brand has changed everything for certain fans, some fans have stopped going all together. (Including myself until we change back to blue, hate to say it but it dont seem the same club).

shane it is such a shame the way it has been done.i know a few of your lads who feel the same way you do even though they still attending.the prem masks a lot of things.a relegation with a few season in the champ and the fans will soon drop off.my team lost a fair few thousand after only a few seasons back in the champ.tbf we have a owner who cannot leave hong kong which doesn,t help funny enough he spent a load of money on the back of prem survival and well you know the rest.

Your owner situation has been going on for ages now hasnt it. Sure I read you was meant to be getting taken over again a few months back?

Errmmm. Im fairly sure they renamed the stadium tye ethiad stadium. Type of rebranding right there.

called sponsership mate not rebranding.in x amount of years the stadiam name deal will be up for grabs again.if no one pays the right money it will go back to eastlands /city of manchester stadiam .

JTC, the re-brand is pathetic, but sadly we basically had to go along with it otherwise we may not have had a club.

This re-brand has changed everything for certain fans, some fans have stopped going all together. (Including myself until we change back to blue, hate to say it but it dont seem the same club).

shane it is such a shame the way it has been done.i know a few of your lads who feel the same way you do even though they still attending.the prem masks a lot of things.a relegation with a few season in the champ and the fans will soon drop off.my team lost a fair few thousand after only a few seasons back in the champ.tbf we have a owner who cannot leave hong kong which doesn,t help funny enough he spent a load of money on the back of prem survival and well you know the rest.

Your owner situation has been going on for ages now hasnt it. Sure I read you was meant to be getting taken over again a few months back?

over two yr now mate.iv just spoke with a lad on fb who has just come back from hk.i asked him when is the end coming ?he said he doesn,t know .the lad is itk generally.taught himself mandarin to check the hk papers etc.the lad has a blues website called often partisan.lot of apathy down blues mate.i,d be apathetic myself but i can,t be arsed .all i will say imo is we,ve sold a lot of players ,had sky dollar and got the wages down.money has been used to keep the club going but i would say there is money that seems to have gone missing .maybe to hk?it wouldn,t surprise me if they try to get as much of the 80m back then when the sky cash goes and there is absolutely no one left to sell then it,s admin time.admin isn,t good for the china man if he can possibly draw money still out the club.admin would mean the club being sold for pennies.atm i couldn,t see a buyer paying no more than 20m and that,s if we are trading still.when we last in the prem we payed hleb 70k pw on loan clubs like us cannot do this.atm we have players coming in on 5k pw so i hear then zigic on about 60k .i love the zig but those wages are crippling us