Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:18 pm

Should we try and sign him considering he is now second choice right back at southampton

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:23 pm

I would like him here. Reminds me of Keiran Gibbs. Lots of pace and likes to get forward.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:36 pm

Deffo have him here but I doubt the Saints will let him go.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:43 pm

Saints wouldn't sell to a relegation rival

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:46 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:Saints wouldn't sell to a relegation rival


I think they're more a mid table side now. Not relegation...

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:49 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:Saints wouldn't sell to a relegation rival

Are you pissed?

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:50 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:Saints wouldn't sell to a relegation rival


WTF!! Relegation rival!? Wake up

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:54 pm

Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:55 pm

Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:56 pm

Super Kev wrote:
Daniel bryan wrote:Saints wouldn't sell to a relegation rival


I think they're more a mid table side now. Not relegation...

They were mid-table last season but were still in the relegation fight, I agree they have a good squad, but no one safe yet, we'll wait and see

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:57 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:
Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Brayford 1.5m
Gunnarsson free
Mason 250k
Taylor free



:wave: :wave:

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:03 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Brayford 1.5m
Gunnarsson free
Mason 250k
Taylor free

Taylor shit, mason shit, brayford untested, well done malky on your 1 good bargain. Bye bye please come again


:wave: :wave:

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:05 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:
Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Brayford 1.5m
Gunnarsson free
Mason 250k
Taylor free

Taylor shit, mason shit, brayford untested, well done malky on your 1 good bargain. Bye bye please come again


:wave: :wave:

Taylor shit :lol: Mason shit? :lol: Brayford untested despite not playing one game yet.

Kimbo for 2.5m could prove to be a bargain, Mutch for 2m as well. Noone for 1.5m.

Damn you Malky, you are so poor in the transfer market :lol:

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:07 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:
Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Brayford 1.5m
Gunnarsson free
Mason 250k
Taylor free

Taylor shit, mason shit, brayford untested, well done malky on your 1 good bargain. Bye bye please come again


:wave: :wave:

Taylor and Mason shit? f*cking hell! :lol:

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:08 pm

CantonJack wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Brayford 1.5m
Gunnarsson free
Mason 250k
Taylor free

Taylor shit, mason shit, brayford untested, well done malky on your 1 good bargain. Bye bye please come again


:wave: :wave:

Taylor and Mason shit? f*cking hell! :lol:

Taylor with Premier League experience behind him is shit, Mason a 20 year old striker at the time scoring in a League Cup final and getting twelve league goals in his first season for Cardiff. So shit aren't they :lol:

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:11 pm

If you think mason can cut it in the prem then you must be on drugs. Have you not been reading the wales online articles this week about cardiff needing quality full backs, something we have not got. Noone?? Hardly played not even malky rates him. You really are a retard :D

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:13 pm

CantonJack wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Brayford 1.5m
Gunnarsson free
Mason 250k
Taylor free

Taylor shit, mason shit, brayford untested, well done malky on your 1 good bargain. Bye bye please come again


:wave: :wave:

Taylor and Mason shit? f*cking hell! :lol:


Not prem quality far from it, thats the problem with some of you numbskull fans, you think these players are quality, if malky thinks this as well then we will finish bottom no doubt. Wake up and smell the bottom of the table

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:14 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:If you think mason can cut it in the prem then you must be on drugs. Have you not been reading the wales online articles this week about cardiff needing quality full backs, something we have not got. Noone?? Hardly played not even malky rates him. You really are a retard :D

Yes, the article praises Taylor but says we're short on depth in defence
As for Mason, He was good enough to put the ball in the Liverpool net :wave:

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:16 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:If you think mason can cut it in the prem then you must be on drugs. Have you not been reading the wales online articles this week about cardiff needing quality full backs, something we have not got. Noone?? Hardly played not even malky rates him. You really are a retard :D

Yes, the article praises Taylor but says we're short on depth in defence
As for Mason, He was good enough to put the ball in the Liverpool net :wave:


So why is he not even on the bench for us Mr Villa?

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:19 pm

Gone quiet Villa? Thought so.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:23 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:
Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:If you think mason can cut it in the prem then you must be on drugs. Have you not been reading the wales online articles this week about cardiff needing quality full backs, something we have not got. Noone?? Hardly played not even malky rates him. You really are a retard :D

Yes, the article praises Taylor but says we're short on depth in defence
As for Mason, He was good enough to put the ball in the Liverpool net :wave:


So why is he not even on the bench for us Mr Villa?

Because last season, due to the influx of cash, Malky opted to go for experience to win the title. Mason still managed to get four goals if I'm not mistaken in limited appearances, whilst our topscorer only scored 9 goals. Malky things highly of Mason as do I.

Your thoughts on Noone as well, Noone doesn't play one game vs West Ham and he's not in Malky's plans? Why would Malky track him for so long, then not use him properly? He's still in his plans. 8 goals and 14 assists I think. So shit!!!

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:28 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:
Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:
Blue Legend wrote:Good player, would be useful but I doubt if Malky is looking at him.


Malky doesn't look at bargains, only expensive overpriced players

Brayford 1.5m
Gunnarsson free
Mason 250k
Taylor free

Taylor shit, mason shit, brayford untested, well done malky on your 1 good bargain. Bye bye please come again


:wave: :wave:


Thick as shit.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:28 pm

We need players to keep us in the prem you total retard, not good championship players or players for the future, 3-4 years it may take for masons to be prem quality if he ever will be. Maybe malky sees what most of us with a brain cell see, noone is not prem qual and we need prem qual wingers. f**k me you are thick, you do realise we are in the prem not the championship?

Fulham signed bent who banged 1 in first game, theres a bargain we could of had, prob went for around 5 mil to fulham, this guy guarantees prem goals not mason haa

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:36 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:We need players to keep us in the prem you total retard, not good championship players or players for the future, 3-4 years it may take for masons to be prem quality if he ever will be. Maybe malky sees what most of us with a brain cell see, noone is not prem qual and we need prem qual wingers. f**k me you are thick, you do realise we are in the prem not the championship?

Fulham signed bent who banged 1 in first game, theres a bargain we could of had, prob went for around 5 mil to fulham, this guy guarantees prem goals not mason haa

How am I thick for thinking exactly what most other Cardiff fans think? Malky's made one mistake in the transfer market and that was Eti. He made a play-off team on a budget of 2m, that team also made the League Cup final, he made a WHOLE team on 2m.

Is Medel not good enough despite being a first team starter in the Chile squad and a constant starter for Sevilla with the best passing stats?
I love how you keep calling everyone that disagrees with you thick/retarded or an idiot.

:laughing6: :laughing6: :laughing6: :laughing6:

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:46 pm

Why you on about Medel? I said malky does not do bargain players i never mentioned medel Mr Villa. A lot of people have even said we paid to much for Medel. I think we may of paid a few mil over the odds for medel as well.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:49 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:Why you on about Medel? I said malky does not do bargain players i never mentioned medel Mr Villa. A lot of people have even said we paid to much for Medel. I think we may of paid a few mil over the odds for medel as well.

Why do you call people retarded/thick/stupid just because they don't agree with your opinion? No one does it to you?

Well Medel was 9.5m, we haven't overpaid at all, considering he was the best passer at Seville with an 89% percentage.
Again, you ignore the fact when you've been stumped you throw petty remarks at people

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:52 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:
BobbyBlue wrote:Why you on about Medel? I said malky does not do bargain players i never mentioned medel Mr Villa. A lot of people have even said we paid to much for Medel. I think we may of paid a few mil over the odds for medel as well.

Why do you call people retarded/thick/stupid just because they don't agree with your opinion? No one does it to you?

Well Medel was 9.5m, we haven't overpaid at all, considering he was the best passer at Seville with an 89% percentage.
Again, you ignore the fact when you've been stumped you throw petty remarks at people


9.5? 11 more like. I called you Mr Villa open your eyes.

ill leave you to it anyway, you staying on this forum all night then? Im off out now got a life, man city tomorrow then doubt ill see you there, you l prob be watching from your house in Birmingham.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:53 pm

Cornelius at 8.5 or darren bent (proven prem goal scorer) for 5 mil, i know who id prefer. Laters gimp

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:56 pm

BobbyBlue wrote:Cornelius at 8.5 or darren bent (proven prem goal scorer) for 5 mil, i know who id prefer. Laters gimp


Cornelius was 7.5m. If you don't know how much we've paid for players, then be quiet.

Re: Nat clyne

Sat Aug 24, 2013 4:01 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:Saints wouldn't sell to a relegation rival


That's what I like, a positive thinker