Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:23 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:25 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:31 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:34 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:No.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:35 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:36 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:36 pm
citybluechris wrote:I admitt malkys willingness to stick to the crap hoofball tactics annoy shit out of me and has done since a season and a half when he started doing it, his subsitution making always is a worry, feel malky needs to realse what worked last season will not thos season, but saying that i do believe malky will come good and change things even if he his a stubbourn scot
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:37 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:citybluechris wrote:I admitt malkys willingness to stick to the crap hoofball tactics annoy shit out of me and has done since a season and a half when he started doing it, his subsitution making always is a worry, feel malky needs to realse what worked last season will not thos season, but saying that i do believe malky will come good and change things even if he his a stubbourn scot
This hoofball term has become some sort of cult word on here. We had more possession that the spammers on Saturday and 2nd half it was rarely lumped forward. We just played utter cack on the day.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:39 pm
paulh_85 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:citybluechris wrote:I admitt malkys willingness to stick to the crap hoofball tactics annoy shit out of me and has done since a season and a half when he started doing it, his subsitution making always is a worry, feel malky needs to realse what worked last season will not thos season, but saying that i do believe malky will come good and change things even if he his a stubbourn scot
This hoofball term has become some sort of cult word on here. We had more possession that the spammers on Saturday and 2nd half it was rarely lumped forward. We just played utter cack on the day.
i dont think we played utter cack at all, just had nothing in terms of attacking threat. If ince had signed for us the game on saturday would have looked totally different, with an attacking outlet.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:39 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:A few examples:
Norwich, Swansea, Southampton. All stayed up with little or no experiance in the squad or management.
QPR, Bolton, Wigan. Vast experiance in both players and management.
It was our first game on Saturday and a big step up. Malky deserves the chance to at least try and if he fails, ultimately he will lose his job. I honestly believe we will be ok.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:40 pm
paulh_85 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:citybluechris wrote:I admitt malkys willingness to stick to the crap hoofball tactics annoy shit out of me and has done since a season and a half when he started doing it, his subsitution making always is a worry, feel malky needs to realse what worked last season will not thos season, but saying that i do believe malky will come good and change things even if he his a stubbourn scot
This hoofball term has become some sort of cult word on here. We had more possession that the spammers on Saturday and 2nd half it was rarely lumped forward. We just played utter cack on the day.
i dont think we played utter cack at all, just had nothing in terms of attacking threat. If ince had signed for us the game on saturday would have looked totally different, with an attacking outlet.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:44 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:paulh_85 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:citybluechris wrote:I admitt malkys willingness to stick to the crap hoofball tactics annoy shit out of me and has done since a season and a half when he started doing it, his subsitution making always is a worry, feel malky needs to realse what worked last season will not thos season, but saying that i do believe malky will come good and change things even if he his a stubbourn scot
This hoofball term has become some sort of cult word on here. We had more possession that the spammers on Saturday and 2nd half it was rarely lumped forward. We just played utter cack on the day.
i dont think we played utter cack at all, just had nothing in terms of attacking threat. If ince had signed for us the game on saturday would have looked totally different, with an attacking outlet.
How? Would Conolly, Turner and Johns pumps upfield miraculously boomeranged to Tom Inces feet.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:45 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:A few examples:
Norwich, Swansea, Southampton. All stayed up with little or no experiance in the squad or management.
QPR, Bolton, Wigan. Vast experiance in both players and management.
It was our first game on Saturday and a big step up. Malky deserves the chance to at least try and if he fails, ultimately he will lose his job. I honestly believe we will be ok.
I would only liken Norwich to our situation and yes theyve done well.
Swansea and Southampton played a brand of football that suited the Premiership.
Bolton and Wigan had been in the Prem for years before their relegation so not sure why youve mentioned them tbh.
QPR well they signed the wrong type of proffesionals everyone in football knows that.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:46 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:48 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:49 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:A few examples:
Norwich, Swansea, Southampton. All stayed up with little or no experiance in the squad or management.
QPR, Bolton, Wigan. Vast experiance in both players and management.
It was our first game on Saturday and a big step up. Malky deserves the chance to at least try and if he fails, ultimately he will lose his job. I honestly believe we will be ok.
I would only liken Norwich to our situation and yes theyve done well.
Swansea and Southampton played a brand of football that suited the Premiership.
Bolton and Wigan had been in the Prem for years before their relegation so not sure why youve mentioned them tbh.
QPR well they signed the wrong type of proffesionals everyone in football knows that.
I mentioned Bolton and Wigan as they had tons of experience and still got relegated, kinda re-enforcing the point that experience isnt the be all and end all.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:49 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:50 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:50 pm
RFMH wrote:Paul Lambert's Norwih didn't win for 5 games.
Brendan Rodgers' Swansea 4 games with no goals.
Its far to soon for this level of over reaction.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:50 pm
paulh_85 wrote:must say, despite the rumours all week that connelly would start, im surprised Malky went out and bought a right back he called the best in the championship, and then continued to play a converted centre back there instead.
I thought the defending was bad when i was at the game, looked even worse on tv with connelly looking to have given up before jarvis had hit it over.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:59 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:No.
I didnt address you Barnett dont post on my threads please. You said you had me on ignore. Your rules.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:00 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Why was Hudson dropped?
He was our calm head in defence last season and it showed toward the end when he was injured and we stopped keeping clean sheets. I think Malky let his heart rule his head on Sat and tried to fit everyone in, I dont think kimbo and whitts can play in the centre together, too lightweight and i dont think whitts can play on the wing as he has 0 pace.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:00 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:paulh_85 wrote:must say, despite the rumours all week that connelly would start, im surprised Malky went out and bought a right back he called the best in the championship, and then continued to play a converted centre back there instead.
I thought the defending was bad when i was at the game, looked even worse on tv with connelly looking to have given up before jarvis had hit it over.
Brayford had a knock but should be ok for sunday.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:01 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:06 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:No.
I didnt address you Barnett dont post on my threads please. You said you had me on ignore. Your rules.
You broke that earlier when you decided to post on my thread.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:07 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Good post polo and the best I've seen off you up to date, not only are you at times another braindead forum poster but your a genius at times when u have to be, your well respected by the oldguard so ignore the buck tooth teens, I think the only place MM will take us is down as he does not know anything other than one style of play, he be lucky to last till xmas to be honest in my opinion.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:07 pm
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:07 pm
paulh_85 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:paulh_85 wrote:must say, despite the rumours all week that connelly would start, im surprised Malky went out and bought a right back he called the best in the championship, and then continued to play a converted centre back there instead.
I thought the defending was bad when i was at the game, looked even worse on tv with connelly looking to have given up before jarvis had hit it over.
Brayford had a knock but should be ok for sunday.
fair enough, though i would even prefer mcnaughton at RB to be honest.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:09 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Good post polo and the best I've seen off you up to date, not only are you at times another braindead forum poster but your a genius at times when u have to be, your well respected by the oldguard so ignore the buck tooth teens, I think the only place MM will take us is down as he does not know anything other than one style of play, he be lucky to last till xmas to be honest in my opinion.
Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:09 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:paulh_85 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:paulh_85 wrote:must say, despite the rumours all week that connelly would start, im surprised Malky went out and bought a right back he called the best in the championship, and then continued to play a converted centre back there instead.
I thought the defending was bad when i was at the game, looked even worse on tv with connelly looking to have given up before jarvis had hit it over.
Brayford had a knock but should be ok for sunday.
fair enough, though i would even prefer mcnaughton at RB to be honest.
^^^^^ This