Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:54 pm

Malky on BBC "We defended well"
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:14 pm

The marking for Nolans goal was diabolical

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:14 pm

Connolly and Caulker both ball watching

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:16 pm

Joe Cole should never have been allowed to turn and shoot for the first goal

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:18 pm

The thing is I've seen Turner get slated on here for starting but he was not at fault for either goal

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:20 pm

CjBluebird17 wrote:The thing is I've seen Turner get slated on here for starting but he was not at fault for either goal


Should've got a block in on the first goal.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:22 pm

all good sayin that he should have blocked first goal but there was 2 players there not just him.. plus conners should never let the cross come in so he was at fault not turner.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:27 pm

The sun got it spot on about turner, it says he needs to improve his distributiom vastly up to premiership standard. In other words stop hoofing it upfield

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:28 pm

Are people still crying abut this? :laughing6: :lol: pathetic

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:35 pm

RFMH wrote:Are people still crying abut this? :laughing6: :lol: pathetic



Not seeing any tears like?

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:10 pm

Super Kev wrote:
CjBluebird17 wrote:The thing is I've seen Turner get slated on here for starting but he was not at fault for either goal


Should've got a block in on the first goal.

Connolly should've blocked the cross

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:06 pm

Judging the photo that is not the defence job to be going to tackle the man but the midfield.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:20 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:Judging the photo that is not the defence job to be going to tackle the man but the midfield.


Yes but why was Connelly and Caulker standing off Nolan on the edge of the box? Shocking defending at this level

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:25 pm

They had 3 shots on target all match.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:41 pm

CjBluebird17 wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:Judging the photo that is not the defence job to be going to tackle the man but the midfield.


Yes but why was Connelly and Caulker standing off Nolan on the edge of the box? Shocking defending at this level


Nothing is developing in that picture and if they come out then it would just be shambles like Wigan.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:45 pm

We were very average, we still look like a Championship team.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:47 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:
CjBluebird17 wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:Judging the photo that is not the defence job to be going to tackle the man but the midfield.


Yes but why was Connelly and Caulker standing off Nolan on the edge of the box? Shocking defending at this level


Nothing is developing in that picture and if they come out then it would just be shambles like Wigan.




Well Dando you see nothing developing and that's fair enough...
But this is what I see......

I see Maiga (unchallenged) about to lay the ball of to Noble.
Noble who appears to have a head start over Medel.
And I see Turner,Caulker and Connolly all ball watching.
Meanwhile Kevin Nolan, on the edge of the area in between the RB and CB virtually unmarked.


But that's just my view....

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:50 pm

aj1927 wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
CjBluebird17 wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:Judging the photo that is not the defence job to be going to tackle the man but the midfield.


Yes but why was Connelly and Caulker standing off Nolan on the edge of the box? Shocking defending at this level


Nothing is developing in that picture and if they come out then it would just be shambles like Wigan.




Well Dando you see nothing developing and that's fair enough...
But this is what I see......

I see Maiga (unchallenged) about to lay the ball of to Noble.
Noble who appears to have a head start over Medel.
And I see Turner,Caulker and Connolly all ball watching.
Meanwhile Kevin Nolan, on the edge of the area in between the RB and CB virtually unmarked.


But that's just my view....


Completely, agree. You can't ball watch in this league. Norwich got punished yesterday against Everton because Redmond was too busy ball watching and didnt pick up coleman and both Connelly and Caulker have done the same here

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:50 pm

aj1927 wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
CjBluebird17 wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:Judging the photo that is not the defence job to be going to tackle the man but the midfield.


Yes but why was Connelly and Caulker standing off Nolan on the edge of the box? Shocking defending at this level


Nothing is developing in that picture and if they come out then it would just be shambles like Wigan.




Well Dando you see nothing developing and that's fair enough...
But this is what I see......

I see Maiga (unchallenged) about to lay the ball of to Noble.
Noble who appears to have a head start over Medel.
And I see Turner,Caulker and Connolly all ball watching.
Meanwhile Kevin Nolan, on the edge of the area in between the RB and CB virtually unmarked.


But that's just my view....


Somebody should of stuck to Nolan but if they come out towards Noble then they just leave a huge gap behind for someone to run into.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:55 pm

That's why I posted the Pic Dando. To be fair I should've said something like ..

"TELL ME WHAT YOU SEE?"

Connolly and Caulker just didn't seem to be communicating. Hudson would've been screaming his f*cking head off.

Can anyone confirm if Hudson was carrying a niggle or something?

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:57 pm

aj1927 wrote:That's why I posted the Pic Dando. To be fair I should've said something like ..

"TELL ME WHAT YOU SEE?"

Connolly and Caulker just didn't seem to be communicating. Hudson would've been screaming his f*cking head off.

Can anyone confirm if Hudson was carrying a niggle or something?


Don't think he was, just a choice by MM.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:01 pm

I'd be shocked if that were true....

If it was though,Malky is Still Learning and you only learn by making mistakes. :ayatollah:

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:20 pm

Don't blame cbs for either goal we were never cut open all game apart from j cole shit chip just invited too much pressure and caught out.Would be more worried if both goals came from balls through the middle with no pace to cover.
:ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Mon Aug 19, 2013 5:58 am

carl dale number 1 fan wrote:Don't blame cbs for either goal we were never cut open all game apart from j cole shit chip just invited too much pressure and caught out.Would be more worried if both goals came from balls through the middle with no pace to cover.
:ayatollah: :ayatollah:

This.
West ham are a good team. It was bound to be hard. Start accepting it or it will be a very long season.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:26 am

Get used to the fact we are a going to get turned over 9 times out of ten otherwise you're gonna be pulling your hair out all season long.

As for the picture, the defence are not doing anything wrong. What's with this "ball watching" phrase? It's usually used to have a go at players that were doing NOTHIN OTHER than ball watching, not those who are marshalling a defensive line that is a hell of a lot bigger than one WHU player in the middle of the picture.

If we are going to man mark a player of the quality of Noble we are in for a tonne of shocks, there are much better players than him that could command man marking. The defence are spread well awaiting an attack.

The question is where are the midfield? If Medel is DM he should be sat forward of Caulker not coming in off the left wing a little too late and where at the others? Tracking back would have helped that situation no end. Where's Kim or Gunnarson?

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:06 am

I'd agree with what's been said so far, in the Connolly got done with the cross leading up to that first goal - sold a right dummy. Then for the second goal, Nolan was stood in loads of space because Turner was watching the ball...

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:09 am

He's hardly gonna come out and say our defending was shit. He knows that isn't good enough and I'd be surprised to see Connolly at right back again this season baring injuries. I think I'd want to see us play at home first where we attack the game and look for 3 points before judging. He must want another 1-2 new faces before the window closes as well, I'd be shocked if he doesn't.

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Mon Aug 19, 2013 10:44 am

BigGwynram wrote:They had 3 shots on target all match.


and scored with two of them defending both goals was poor, Cole was allowed to turn and place the ball in the bottom corner & Nolan was left unmarked to pick his spot

That is the harsh reality of the premiership that if we make basic defensive errors by not marking properly we will get punished

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Mon Aug 19, 2013 10:58 am

Super Kev wrote:
CjBluebird17 wrote:The thing is I've seen Turner get slated on here for starting but he was not at fault for either goal


Should've got a block in on the first goal.


Agreed,

Re: NO MALKY WE DID NOT

Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:05 am

DandoCCFC wrote:
aj1927 wrote:That's why I posted the Pic Dando. To be fair I should've said something like ..

"TELL ME WHAT YOU SEE?"

Connolly and Caulker just didn't seem to be communicating. Hudson would've been screaming his f*cking head off.

Can anyone confirm if Hudson was carrying a niggle or something?


Don't think he was, just a choice by MM.

Surely if Hudson was carrying a knock or a niggle, he wouldn't have been our only recognised defensive cover on the bench?