Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:09 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:44 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:47 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:49 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Aim to get blue back?
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:50 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:51 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:52 pm
JonCCFC wrote:If you want blue back then Bluebirds Unite is the group to join.
![]()
![]()
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:56 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Aim to get blue back?
Yes but in the right manner and with few members who are known to all and can contribute to the groups aims. A modern badge that is professionally designed and to restore blue as the home kit with yellow and white trim.
You can find the aims and full information on the website Alex.![]()
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:57 pm
CantonJack wrote:I don't get it![]()
I thought you were red? What tradition are you trying to restore? Bringing blue back? I'm sure that's what Bluebirds Unite are trying to do
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:57 pm
CantonJack wrote:I don't get it![]()
I thought you were red? What tradition are you trying to restore? Bringing blue back? I'm sure that's what Bluebirds Unite are trying to do
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:01 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:04 pm
JonCCFC wrote:If you want blue back then Bluebirds Unite is the group to join.
![]()
![]()
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:08 pm
JonCCFC wrote:So bascially what Bluebirds Unite are doing
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:08 pm
thomasblue wrote:What are the aims for this group and what action will you be taking to be noticeable and make a difference ?( ie marches)
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:09 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:17 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I've no problem with anyone standing up and acting on what they believe. Good luck!
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:20 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:20 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:30 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:JonCCFC wrote:So bascially what Bluebirds Unite are doing
No. Bluebirds Unite have loads of members and a presence of meetings and events. They have, to some, been given a bad image by a minority and therefore there are people don't want to associate with Bluebirds Unite. Bluebirds Unite have plenty of members who get involved.
We will have at maximum 50 members who communicate online and seek dialogue with the club and try and get things done that way without a minority damaging the reputation of the group whilst trying to achieve our aims.
![]()
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:33 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:37 pm
thomasblue wrote:What we need is a pro blue group which has a massive lean towards charitable donations , organised family days , five a side kids tournaments , charity racing nights for the adults in different venues .
Not marches which by nature look aggressive , not putting huge billboards up wasting money collected which could have gone to a good cause and pissing tan off , not covering the place with pathetic little stickers .
Tans got a huge weakness for charity , can't believe none of these groups have ever picked up on it . If he finds out about a group which are polite and non aggressive that are doing loads of work for charity's in the area giving decent size cheques out he would be more impressed and more likely to talk to these groups . Use his weakness against him whilst also doing some much needed work in our community
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:38 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:I would be interested Barnett but going by your track record of switching sides and what you believe in I'm dubious about this group
Barry Chuckle wrote:I admit interest too, but agree with CJ, you've changed opinion on this a fair few times. Only earlier you were describing yourself as a "yellow".
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:41 pm
JonCCFC wrote:thomasblue wrote:What we need is a pro blue group which has a massive lean towards charitable donations , organised family days , five a side kids tournaments , charity racing nights for the adults in different venues .
Not marches which by nature look aggressive , not putting huge billboards up wasting money collected which could have gone to a good cause and pissing tan off , not covering the place with pathetic little stickers .
Tans got a huge weakness for charity , can't believe none of these groups have ever picked up on it . If he finds out about a group which are polite and non aggressive that are doing loads of work for charity's in the area giving decent size cheques out he would be more impressed and more likely to talk to these groups . Use his weakness against him whilst also doing some much needed work in our community
The only aim for Bluebirds Unite is to get blue back, not to raise money for charities...
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:43 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:44 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:In fairness BU have already donated money to charity.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:48 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:50 pm
bluedragons wrote:A 'small group' with a maximum of '50 members' who are 'well known.'
Sounds exclusive and more for your ego in my opinion.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:52 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:bluedragons wrote:A 'small group' with a maximum of '50 members' who are 'well known.'
Sounds exclusive and more for your ego in my opinion.
Do you want the club back in blue and if the name changes how would you feel about it?
Nothing to do with my ego but when you see Hull City Tigers vs Chelsea FC it really shows how bad it can become for us if Tan goes through with a name change and thats my worry.
The less members the easier it is to moderate and keep professional without people tarnishing the groups image as has happened with Bluebirds Unite.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:53 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:57 pm
bluedragons wrote:The less members there are the less the effect. If you want to make a stand you need a high % of supporters to be members to prove that is what the fans want.
Why may I ask does the group need to be made up of 'well known supporters' what is the effect of that supposed to be?