Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:42 pm

It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.

If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.

This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.

Look forward to my ban and deleted subject

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:56 pm

AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.

If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.

This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.

Look forward to my ban and deleted subject

What are you talking about exactly ?

I don't think many who may get bits of info will ever reveal where or who the info came from, especially if they hope to get more snippets in future.

So you think that the image rights and 3rd party involvement is fairy tales. :sleepy2:

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:57 pm

carlccfc wrote:
AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.

If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.

This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.

Look forward to my ban and deleted subject

What are you talking about exactly ?

I don't think many who may get bits of info will ever reveal where or who the info came from, especially if they hope to get more snippets in future.

So you think that the image rights and 3rd party involvement is fairy tales. :sleepy2:


They're not the most exciting fairy tales if they are fairy tales.

You could have at least had a bit about dragons or witches getting in the way.

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:58 pm

Aramore wrote:
carlccfc wrote:
AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.

If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.

This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.

Look forward to my ban and deleted subject

What are you talking about exactly ?

I don't think many who may get bits of info will ever reveal where or who the info came from, especially if they hope to get more snippets in future.

So you think that the image rights and 3rd party involvement is fairy tales. :sleepy2:


They're not the most exciting fairy tales if they are fairy tales.

You could have at least had a bit about dragons or witches getting in the way.

Exactly, if I was going to make something up I think I could have come up with something a bit more far fetched or sensational. :lol:

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:08 pm

carlccfc wrote:
Aramore wrote:
carlccfc wrote:
AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.

If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.

This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.

Look forward to my ban and deleted subject

What are you talking about exactly ?

I don't think many who may get bits of info will ever reveal where or who the info came from, especially if they hope to get more snippets in future.

So you think that the image rights and 3rd party involvement is fairy tales. :sleepy2:


They're not the most exciting fairy tales if they are fairy tales.

You could have at least had a bit about dragons or witches getting in the way.

Exactly, if I was going to make something up I think I could have come up with something a bit more far fetched or sensational. :lol:


Unicorns maybe?

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:24 pm

"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.


Try not to get wound up AberdareCCFC1966 by these type of things, it's not worth it. it's nice to have snippets of info, regardless of sources. I'd say at least 55% of rumors on here turn out to have some substance to them. Just take it with a pinch of salt :malky:

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:30 pm

AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.

So you want people to reveal there sourse of a fairy tale, mines peter pan, log off if the internet baffles you to much thats all the advice i can give you :malky:

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:44 pm

Chip shop Alley wrote:
"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.


Try not to get wound up AberdareCCFC1966 by these type of things, it's not worth it. it's nice to have snippets of info, regardless of sources. I'd say at least 55% of rumors on here turn out to have some substance to them. Just take it with a pinch of salt :malky:


Only reason I've posted this is because it was my son who asked the question but has since been banned for asking what the persons source

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:55 pm

AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:
Chip shop Alley wrote:
"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.


Try not to get wound up AberdareCCFC1966 by these type of things, it's not worth it. it's nice to have snippets of info, regardless of sources. I'd say at least 55% of rumors on here turn out to have some substance to them. Just take it with a pinch of salt :malky:


Only reason I've posted this is because it was my son who asked the question but has since been banned for asking what the persons source


If it was a harmless query, then i'd say it's a bit harsh. If it was a bombardment of demand including insult, then the right action has been taken.

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:56 pm

Montero was apparently never close to signing so whoever the source is they were wrong :lol:

Re: Image Rights

Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:00 pm

Chip shop Alley wrote:
"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.


Try not to get wound up AberdareCCFC1966 by these type of things, it's not worth it. it's nice to have snippets of info, regardless of sources. I'd say at least 55% of rumors on here turn out to have some substance to them. Just take it with a pinch of salt :malky:


Id say about 5 percent. Seen some of the crap that is posted on here? There about 3-4 posters you can trust with nearly 90 percent accuracy of their rumours :lol: