Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:42 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:56 pm
AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.
If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.
Look forward to my ban and deleted subject
Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:57 pm
carlccfc wrote:AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.
If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.
Look forward to my ban and deleted subject
What are you talking about exactly ?
I don't think many who may get bits of info will ever reveal where or who the info came from, especially if they hope to get more snippets in future.
So you think that the image rights and 3rd party involvement is fairy tales.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:58 pm
Aramore wrote:carlccfc wrote:AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.
If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.
Look forward to my ban and deleted subject
What are you talking about exactly ?
I don't think many who may get bits of info will ever reveal where or who the info came from, especially if they hope to get more snippets in future.
So you think that the image rights and 3rd party involvement is fairy tales.
They're not the most exciting fairy tales if they are fairy tales.
You could have at least had a bit about dragons or witches getting in the way.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:08 pm
carlccfc wrote:Aramore wrote:carlccfc wrote:AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:It appears that when a question was asked about a potential player signing for us was being held up by "Image Rights" and questioned its source as since been banned from posting on this Forum.
If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
This Forum has been made up for the masses, not a chosen few.
Look forward to my ban and deleted subject
What are you talking about exactly ?
I don't think many who may get bits of info will ever reveal where or who the info came from, especially if they hope to get more snippets in future.
So you think that the image rights and 3rd party involvement is fairy tales.
They're not the most exciting fairy tales if they are fairy tales.
You could have at least had a bit about dragons or witches getting in the way.
Exactly, if I was going to make something up I think I could have come up with something a bit more far fetched or sensational.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:24 pm
"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:30 pm
AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:If Moderators continue to post and dont reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:44 pm
Chip shop Alley wrote:"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
Try not to get wound up AberdareCCFC1966 by these type of things, it's not worth it. it's nice to have snippets of info, regardless of sources. I'd say at least 55% of rumors on here turn out to have some substance to them. Just take it with a pinch of salt
Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:55 pm
AberdareCCFC1966 wrote:Chip shop Alley wrote:"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
Try not to get wound up AberdareCCFC1966 by these type of things, it's not worth it. it's nice to have snippets of info, regardless of sources. I'd say at least 55% of rumors on here turn out to have some substance to them. Just take it with a pinch of salt
Only reason I've posted this is because it was my son who asked the question but has since been banned for asking what the persons source
Sun Aug 18, 2013 5:56 pm
Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:00 pm
Chip shop Alley wrote:"AberdareCCFC1966" - If Moderators continue to post and don't reveal sources I suggest they don't in future if they don't like being questioned about there made up fairy tales.
Try not to get wound up AberdareCCFC1966 by these type of things, it's not worth it. it's nice to have snippets of info, regardless of sources. I'd say at least 55% of rumors on here turn out to have some substance to them. Just take it with a pinch of salt