Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:31 pm

Why the fuc is this guy still playing, see his shot at goal yest pathetic

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:33 pm

At least he had a shot. The whole team was poor so I don't see the need to pick on a guy who came late on as a sub.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:33 pm

Someone should give him a bone

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:34 pm

Maynard unmarked outside him but head down, complete shank.

Maynard was furious and rightly so.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:34 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:At least he had a shot. The whole team was poor so I don't see the need to pick on a guy who came late on as a sub.


Not picking on him just dont think he shud be playing. What happened to malky being ruthless, some of these guys just aint up to the job, his goal record is one of the worst iv ever seen.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:35 pm

davids wrote:Maynard unmarked outside him but head down, complete shank.

Maynard was furious and rightly so.


This

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:35 pm

Daniel bryan wrote:Someone should give him a bone


And this

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:36 pm

He's shite & not good enough.

Not even a top championship striker.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:38 pm

davids wrote:Maynard unmarked outside him but head down, complete shank.

Maynard was furious and rightly so.


Fair enough but Maynard had the best chance of the game and blew it.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:40 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:He's shite & not good enough.
.


Alas based on yesterday that description may apply to quite a few of our team.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:40 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
davids wrote:Maynard unmarked outside him but head down, complete shank.

Maynard was furious and rightly so.


Fair enough but Maynard had the best chance of the game and blew it.


I wudnt say maynard blew it id say it was a good foot in by the defender

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:49 pm

BiggyG wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
davids wrote:Maynard unmarked outside him but head down, complete shank.

Maynard was furious and rightly so.


Fair enough but Maynard had the best chance of the game and blew it.


I wudnt say maynard blew it id say it was a good foot in by the defender


You have to take chances at this level. That was our best chance by far.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:35 pm

Thought it was the correct decision to shoot, as Maynard was in a wider position and Rudy was smack in front of the goal!

It was just a poor shot IMO!

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:41 pm

Come on and within a few moments had a shot. He got Maynard involved and switched things up. Not his fault our midfield looked mostly like lost sheep chasing shadows. Bellamy and Kim were terrible. Also laughable people slagging off Whittingham as he was our second best player yesterday in midfield behind Medel.

Lets just slag off strikers who had no support. That sounds like a truly wonderful idea. We need to invest in a box to box midfielder and at least one winger with real direct pace to even stand a chance.

:roll:

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:54 pm

JBCCFC1927 wrote:Come on and within a few moments had a shot. He got Maynard involved and switched things up. Not his fault our midfield looked mostly like lost sheep chasing shadows. Bellamy and Kim were terrible. Also laughable people slagging off Whittingham as he was our second best player yesterday in midfield behind Medel.

Lets just slag off strikers who had no support. That sounds like a truly wonderful idea. We need to invest in a box to box midfielder and at least one winger with real direct pace to even stand a chance.

:roll:


Wake up and smell the goal drought. The guys a striker who doesn't score goals.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 3:47 pm

BiggyG wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Come on and within a few moments had a shot. He got Maynard involved and switched things up. Not his fault our midfield looked mostly like lost sheep chasing shadows. Bellamy and Kim were terrible. Also laughable people slagging off Whittingham as he was our second best player yesterday in midfield behind Medel.

Lets just slag off strikers who had no support. That sounds like a truly wonderful idea. We need to invest in a box to box midfielder and at least one winger with real direct pace to even stand a chance.

:roll:


Wake up and smell the goal drought. The guys a striker who doesn't score goals.


Target men are not usually known for scoring many goals.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:02 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:
BiggyG wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Come on and within a few moments had a shot. He got Maynard involved and switched things up. Not his fault our midfield looked mostly like lost sheep chasing shadows. Bellamy and Kim were terrible. Also laughable people slagging off Whittingham as he was our second best player yesterday in midfield behind Medel.

Lets just slag off strikers who had no support. That sounds like a truly wonderful idea. We need to invest in a box to box midfielder and at least one winger with real direct pace to even stand a chance.

:roll:


Wake up and smell the goal drought. The guys a striker who doesn't score goals.


Target men are not usually known for scoring many goals.


We play 1 up front though so what use to us is he if he cant score

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:16 pm

BiggyG wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:
BiggyG wrote:
JBCCFC1927 wrote:Come on and within a few moments had a shot. He got Maynard involved and switched things up. Not his fault our midfield looked mostly like lost sheep chasing shadows. Bellamy and Kim were terrible. Also laughable people slagging off Whittingham as he was our second best player yesterday in midfield behind Medel.

Lets just slag off strikers who had no support. That sounds like a truly wonderful idea. We need to invest in a box to box midfielder and at least one winger with real direct pace to even stand a chance.

:roll:


Wake up and smell the goal drought. The guys a striker who doesn't score goals.


Target men are not usually known for scoring many goals.


We play 1 up front though so what use to us is he if he cant score


Blame the midfield for the lack of creativity, not the strikers. None of them could really do anything and only really had to feed off half chances from balls that got scrappy in the box.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:20 pm

Not blaming any1 just saying ruud dog doesn't score goals, end of.

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:26 pm

We dont have anyone prolific
Rudy got 5 league goals last season as a sub mainly
Who was our top scorer and how many did he score
Think it was 9????oh and just for the record whitts hit one from same spot but went 10yards wider dont see anyone slagging him off
Time to stop slagging individuals :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:38 pm

Gestede is a division one striker at best
He is shit

Re: Ruud Dog

Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:43 pm

IMO not good enough but without Cornelious only target man in squad,i also see palace playing Wilbraham who is crap.Only chance of staying up is backing players and malky instead of having a go!1 set back of no doubting quite a few but there is no need to criticise.Think we need 2 defensive midfielders and can only play kim or whitts in away games personally pick mutch with those 2 and see how that goes. :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Ruud Dog

Mon Aug 19, 2013 12:16 pm

I don't like slagging Cardiff players off, but I don't think Rudy is good enough for the Prem. I really hope that the Tank settles in quickly and makes a difference.

People are right though - the strikers had no service yesterday. That's a bigger priority, but based on last season's performances, if Rudy gets a lot of game time this year, we're in trouble.

Re: Ruud Dog

Mon Aug 19, 2013 12:22 pm

He was used as he brought height up front for us seeing as Cornelius was injured. f*cking moaning him about shooting when we barely had a shot all game :roll: