Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:14 am
Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:29 am
Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:34 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote: What does climbing up Kilimanjaro really achieve?
Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:47 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote: What does climbing up Kilimanjaro really achieve?
It creates more of an interest, which in turn, creates more money raised. Someone is far more likely to sponsor a feat such as Kilimanjaro, rather than someone who's done some shifts in a hospital.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:01 am
Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:07 am
Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:23 am
Wayne S wrote:I always wondered what it cost to get over to Kilimanjaro and climb it. It's surely money that could go direct to the charity, but if it works and raises money then fantastic.
Perhaps Cardiff fans could walk the other way and there could be a meet halfway.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:27 am
Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:32 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Good luck to the fella and not for one minute do I question his devotion.
However, I'm always frustrated at these fund raising ideas. What does climbing up Kilimanjaro really achieve? Personally I would like to see fund raisers do something in the local community. For example why don't they do sponsored shifts in a nursing home or a sponsored clean up of a public area?
To me that is far better than wasting fund raised money on flights to Tanzania or shoe leather on walking from Liberty to CCS. May be I'm just a grumpy old git but it still sort of niggles with me.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:46 am
Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:35 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Understand your opinion mate. Your example Is a good one though. You say that Kilimanjaro may raise 4k profit for doing it (taking away costs) I still cannot see an individual making 4k from doing a bit of volunteering work..
It may be wrong, but that's how it is.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:36 pm
Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:38 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:Normally the trip itself would be paid out of his own money I'm guessing rather than taking it out of the charity money raised
Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:45 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote: What does climbing up Kilimanjaro really achieve?
It creates more of an interest, which in turn, creates more money raised. Someone is far more likely to sponsor a feat such as Kilimanjaro, rather than someone who's done some shifts in a hospital.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:54 pm
MillarFromTheHalfWayLine wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Good luck to the fella and not for one minute do I question his devotion.
However, I'm always frustrated at these fund raising ideas. What does climbing up Kilimanjaro really achieve? Personally I would like to see fund raisers do something in the local community. For example why don't they do sponsored shifts in a nursing home or a sponsored clean up of a public area?
To me that is far better than wasting fund raised money on flights to Tanzania or shoe leather on walking from Liberty to CCS. May be I'm just a grumpy old git but it still sort of niggles with me.
You are not completely wrong here Tony.
Please here me out before I get slagged off and I do get where chuckles is coming from but these things are popping up all the time now.
There was only the other day a Cardiff Fan on CCMB asking for sponsorship for the exact same thing, ie
Kilimanjaro (different charity) and I also personally know 3 other people currently raising money for a Kilimanjaro climb.
I also work with a girl who is doing a walk of the great wall of china and has to raise £8000 to do it plus a fella who
has to raise £3000 to do next years London Marathon.
I read on a Website the other day that the average cost to do Kilimanjaro is £1350 plus you have to pay your flights on top all
of which comes out of what has been raised so if you raise £6000, £2000 plus goes on the cost of it.
I know its a double edged sword as the charity still gets £4k and I suppose people could say that justifies it in itself and its hard to argue against that but it is just my own opinion that there has got to be better ways of raising money for charity than this and as awful as this sounds for me to say its does feel like your funding someones own experience of a lifetime?
For myself I just stick to sponsoring people I know personally now and have a direct debit coming out split over 4 charity's a month.
There was a guy on the Radio the other day from the Charity's saying the exact same thing, unless your a celebrity and likely to raise some serious cash there has got to be better ways to do it?
Just my opinion sorry, I feel bad writing this but Its how I view it, happy for someone to try and change my mind.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:01 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote: What does climbing up Kilimanjaro really achieve?
It creates more of an interest, which in turn, creates more money raised. Someone is far more likely to sponsor a feat such as Kilimanjaro, rather than someone who's done some shifts in a hospital.
That totally misses the point. Climbing Kilimanjaro has been done a million times. May be the first time it might have been something special but not now.
I still applaud the guy for giving his free time but I still think that fund raising should take place in the local community and be of benefit to the community which is providing the donations. It is just an opinion of mine, but if someone where to do a sponsored hospital shift in the local area I know I would be far more inclined to donate.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:36 pm
Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:43 pm
murphy wrote:Good luck to Paul Harris. It's a shame swansealad wouldn't climb Kilimanjaro and fall of the top of it.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:54 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote: What does climbing up Kilimanjaro really achieve?
It creates more of an interest, which in turn, creates more money raised. Someone is far more likely to sponsor a feat such as Kilimanjaro, rather than someone who's done some shifts in a hospital.
That totally misses the point. Climbing Kilimanjaro has been done a million times. May be the first time it might have been something special but not now.
I still applaud the guy for giving his free time but I still think that fund raising should take place in the local community and be of benefit to the community which is providing the donations. It is just an opinion of mine, but if someone where to do a sponsored hospital shift in the local area I know I would be far more inclined to donate.
No it doesn't, you asked what does climbing up the mountain achieve & I answered you with the Correct point of more public interest.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:12 pm
Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:44 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:
Exactly I asked what does it achieve climbing Kilimanjaro as it has been done a thousand timesHonestly Chuckles mate its time to give up
Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:51 pm
Real_Blue_Really wrote:If the climbers are claiming exspenses then this culture has become sham. However i'm not sure that they would claim expenses. surely not.
Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:55 pm
MillarFromTheHalfWayLine wrote:Real_Blue_Really wrote:If the climbers are claiming exspenses then this culture has become sham. However i'm not sure that they would claim expenses. surely not.
The cost of the trip comes out of the total amount raised mate, as I said, average cost of Kilimanjaro is £1350 then flights on top.
There may well be the odd exception but as I said above most of the time the cost of the trip comes off the sponsorship so unless you raise a big whack its not good, a lot of charity's have it so you have to raise a certain figure, like I said in the example when me and chuckles were chatting, for example, I know a bloke who's doing it who has to raise £6,000, out of that £6000 comes the costs then the rest to the Charity, so it will be £2000 costs £4000 charity.