THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:31 pm
Over 200 new members yesterday -Welcome BU. CCFC 
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:49 pm
5%
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:56 pm
taffy123 wrote:Over 200 new members yesterday -Welcome BU. CCFC
How can you call it membership unless a subscription has been paid. Perhaps in future general elections can be decided by liking a party on Facebook
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:02 pm
sams lovechild wrote:taffy123 wrote:Over 200 new members yesterday -Welcome BU. CCFC
How can you call it membership unless a subscription has been paid. Perhaps in future general elections can be decided by liking a party on Facebook
------ CCFC 
DEEP THINKER
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:33 pm
You really overuse the smiley feature.
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 3:42 pm
I Bleed Blue wrote:5%
1% of the data base?
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 4:15 pm
I Bleed Blue wrote:5%
Think the whole thing over %'s , BU member levels and tans quote is clouding the wider issue somewhat . I am a member of BU on Facebook , however have not attended a bu meeting . Not sure what tans 5% was actually aimed at . Was it directly at BU ?
A lot of people seem to be spending time trying to either justify why they think BU numbers are in excess of 5% and others mocking them .
For me BU member levels are not the issue . What % of our season ticket holders believe the club should play our home games in red or blue. Wouldn't be too difficult to put that to the fans . Should fans be consulted if a club is going to change the clubs crest ?
% 's against those points are the only thing I am interested in .
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:15 pm
taffy123 wrote:Over 200 new members yesterday -Welcome BU. CCFC
200 new members eh? Is that so they can be REAL fans? Got nothing against the BU going about their business but who the f**k does someone think they are saying if you not blue you not a real fan, ( or words to that effect, so i'm lead to believe )
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:18 pm
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:You really overuse the smiley feature.
Sven Ghali is the worst for the smiley feature, it hurts my eyes trying to read his posts!
No doubt he will see this thread and be disgruntled that VT has once again shot himself in the foot and helped BU build further momentum.
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:55 pm
taffy123 wrote:sams lovechild wrote:taffy123 wrote:Over 200 new members yesterday -Welcome BU. CCFC
How can you call it membership unless a subscription has been paid. Perhaps in future general elections can be decided by liking a party on Facebook
Same can be said about you too. You seem harmless enough but all you do is spout BU post time after time. Getting a tad boring yourself.
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 6:08 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:You really overuse the smiley feature.
Sven Ghali is the worst for the smiley feature, it hurts my eyes trying to read his posts!
No doubt he will see this thread and be disgruntled that VT has once again shot himself in the foot and helped BU build further momentum.
all momentum has probably been lost due to Sian Branson shooting herself in the foot by calling into question fans loyalty to Cardiff City.
Re: THANKS VT
Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:17 pm
I'M SPARTACUS wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:You really overuse the smiley feature.
Sven Ghali is the worst for the smiley feature, it hurts my eyes trying to read his posts!
No doubt he will see this thread and be disgruntled that VT has once again shot himself in the foot and helped BU build further momentum.
all momentum has probably been lost due to Sian Branson shooting herself in the foot by calling into question fans loyalty to Cardiff City.
CLUCTHING AT STRAWS, CCFC