Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:44 am
Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:58 am
taffy123 wrote:http://www.ccfctrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/TrustFansSurveySummary_03132013.pdf CCFC![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:59 am
Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:03 am
northside of risca wrote:taffy123 wrote:http://www.ccfctrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/TrustFansSurveySummary_03132013.pdf CCFC![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Exactly , he's has shot himself in foot with 5% comments . We have 20 k of season tickets . If the club were to do the right thing and survey every season ticket holder the numbers in favour of a return to blue would give them no choice . This is why they didn't do it prior to rebrand and probably never will . A very sad state of affairs .
There is one thing people accepting the rebrand , however even the most ardent of rebrand supporters can't have the brass to say it would win a proper vote of the season ticket holders . Makes the 5% comments pretty laughable really . That trust surveys backs this up further .
Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:07 am
Wayne S wrote:Oppose rather than disagree but accept.![]()
What's the trust membership numbers?
Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:21 am
northside of risca wrote:Wayne S wrote:Oppose rather than disagree but accept.![]()
What's the trust membership numbers?
Believe there is about 1.5k in trust (although may have made that up ) there were nearly 900 people who did that survey and it was a mix of trust and non trust members . You have to conclude that the results are likely to be reflective of overall fan base .
Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:27 am
Wayne S wrote:northside of risca wrote:Wayne S wrote:Oppose rather than disagree but accept.![]()
What's the trust membership numbers?
Believe there is about 1.5k in trust (although may have made that up ) there were nearly 900 people who did that survey and it was a mix of trust and non trust members . You have to conclude that the results are likely to be reflective of overall fan base .
Thought the survey was done by just under 700 but still a good level and definitely representative. Would have expected more than 20% of the membership to have taken the survey though.
Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:25 am
Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:29 am
Dicey wrote:I thought 5% was pretty generous . A generous 400 showed at the last meeting and from 20K I'd say that is 2%
Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:33 am
Dicey wrote:I thought 5% was pretty generous . A generous 400 showed at the last meeting and from 20K I'd say that is 2%
Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:41 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:I thought 5% was pretty generous . A generous 400 showed at the last meeting and from 20K I'd say that is 2%
Well, your figure is wrong for a start.
I'd say near 700 for a midweek meeting during the off-season is very good indeed.
Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:44 am
northside of risca wrote:Dicey wrote:I thought 5% was pretty generous . A generous 400 showed at the last meeting and from 20K I'd say that is 2%
Do you expect every shareholder of a plc to turn up at the agm . Stupid comparative
Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:51 am
Dicey wrote:Well that was the figure quoted by Carl and Annis . Maybe you can get someone on the door to count them next time.
Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:57 am
Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:00 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:Well that was the figure quoted by Carl and Annis . Maybe you can get someone on the door to count them next time.
Well that's another thing that Carl got wrong then.![]()
The pub was full and the owner said there were 600 & he isn't allowed to fit anymore in. So there were several outside.
Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:04 am
Dicey wrote:Ok let's say you are right with your figure of 700 , I now make that 3.5%, still generous
how very naive. Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:10 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:Ok let's say you are right with your figure of 700 , I now make that 3.5%, still generous
So you expected every single person to attend that meeting if they are against the red?how very naive.
700 was an excellent show of support on a WEEK NIGHT & DURING THE OFF SEASON.
Certainly wasn't just 700 people singing "We'll always be Blue" at Tan vs Bolton..
Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:11 am
Dicey wrote:northside of risca wrote:Dicey wrote:I thought 5% was pretty generous . A generous 400 showed at the last meeting and from 20K I'd say that is 2%
Do you expect every shareholder of a plc to turn up at the agm . Stupid comparative
My figures are more accurate than that Facebook / twitter figures put out by the BU rep.
Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:22 am
Dicey wrote:To view the website you have to agree to be a member .... Laughable
Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:09 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Dicey wrote:To view the website you have to agree to be a member .... Laughable
That's another lie. The website is clearly viewable at http://www.bluebirdsunite.org.uk
Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:13 am
Dicey wrote:Ok Facebook quote / members to be precise .
You really are struggling Chuckles to put a good argument against Tans claim of 5% so I shall leave you now. Please feel fee to have the last say .
Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:15 pm