We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:54 pm
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:55 pm
lyndipops wrote:
That old chesnut
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:57 pm
You do realise ANYONE can add ANYTHING to Wiki right?
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:59 pm
T1JMO wrote:You do realise ANYONE can add ANYTHING to Wiki right?
Boom there it is
#defaultresponse
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:59 pm
I didn't alter it, I just had a look in case anyone had. You never know could be an "ITK" person! 
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:05 pm
T1JMO wrote:You do realise ANYONE can add ANYTHING to Wiki right?
Sarcasm. Grasp it or f**k off.
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:07 pm
Wikipedia is heavily monitored. Anyone can edit it but if it isn't accurate it will almost instantly be deleted by an over zealous Wikipedia mod. The fact it's still there is interesting.
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:08 pm
TRJ wrote:Wikipedia is heavily monitored. Anyone can edit it but if it isn't accurate it will almost instantly be deleted by an over zealous Wikipedia mod. The fact it's still there is interesting.
Or the mod is a city fan
Re: We got him according to Wikipedia!
Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:52 pm
TRJ wrote:Wikipedia is heavily monitored. Anyone can edit it but if it isn't accurate it will almost instantly be deleted by an over zealous Wikipedia mod. The fact it's still there is interesting.
How about now then?