Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:51 pm
Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:32 pm
Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:55 pm
splottbluebird48 wrote:Have you protected the photo as if you haven't people could print it off
Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:05 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:splottbluebird48 wrote:Have you protected the photo as if you haven't people could print it off
Cheers Chief![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:08 pm
Wayne S wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:splottbluebird48 wrote:Have you protected the photo as if you haven't people could print it off
Cheers Chief![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does it make a good desktop background?
Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:09 pm
Wayne S wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:splottbluebird48 wrote:Have you protected the photo as if you haven't people could print it off
Cheers Chief![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does it make a good desktop background?
Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:10 pm
rhys1927ccfc wrote:Wayne S wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:splottbluebird48 wrote:Have you protected the photo as if you haven't people could print it off
Cheers Chief![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does it make a good desktop background?
Just saved it, quite blurry for a desktop background but keeping it whatever happens. That's what happens when you don't protect your images.
Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:22 pm
rhys1927ccfc wrote:Wayne S wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:splottbluebird48 wrote:Have you protected the photo as if you haven't people could print it off
Cheers Chief![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does it make a good desktop background?
Just saved it, quite blurry for a desktop background but keeping it whatever happens. That's what happens when you don't protect your images.
Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:55 pm
Wayne S wrote:rhys1927ccfc wrote:Wayne S wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:splottbluebird48 wrote:Have you protected the photo as if you haven't people could print it off
Cheers Chief![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Does it make a good desktop background?
Just saved it, quite blurry for a desktop background but keeping it whatever happens. That's what happens when you don't protect your images.
If you click on the pic it opens up to 1600x1244 should be a decent quality. TLG won't mind it's not as if you have the original.
Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:00 pm
Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:13 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Cheers dave, printed off, just got to get a decent frame now.
Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:51 am
The Lone Gunman wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Cheers dave, printed off, just got to get a decent frame now.
I'm sure it will look splendid. Fake, but splendid.
Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:58 am
Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:02 am
Mon Jul 08, 2013 7:36 pm
Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:33 pm
Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:24 pm
GEnder wrote:Problem is. there's nothing to say which signature is which is there?
Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:30 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:GEnder wrote:Problem is. there's nothing to say which signature is which is there?
Some of the players have put their numbers next to their signatures, so they are easy to identify.
One or two you can actually read (but not many, I'll grant you).
I managed to find a few easily enough in Google images (just enter the player's name and the word 'autograph' and examples usually appear).
I've got to admit though, there are several on there I can't identify at all.
Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:58 pm
redordead wrote:tlg a couple of questions.are you happy with your decision to stop watching the city and what's your take on bu.
Mon Jul 08, 2013 11:18 pm