WHO IS THIS ANDY CARROLL WE WILL BE UP AGAINST

In our 1st game

Poor mans rudy. He's going to set up The winner again!!

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

STOP turning this thread into a rebrand ffs

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

maynard will score the winner, in his first prem league game against the club he left a year ago!

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Well said Chucks

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Well said Chucks

Mate, I hate the rebrand more than most, but some just have an agenda against Tan. I'm not keen on the man, but that's just my thoughts. I won't let that cloud the other work he has done for this club..

Had we spent 15mill on Carroll, the poster above would probably moan we've spent too much on one player.

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Well said Chuckles,agree with you here though its only his point of view.Me,I'll just call him a silly c**t and have done with it.

Agree, the lad is welcome to his opinion.. But the facts are there to prove that he's wrong.

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Well said Chucks

Mate, I hate the rebrand more than most, but some just have an agenda against Tan. I'm not keen on the man, but that's just my thoughts. I won't let that cloud the other work he has done for this club..

Had we spent 15mill on Carroll, the poster above would probably moan we've spent too much on one player.

Totally agree with you on that, I wish more could see some of the good he has done as well as the bad

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Barry, You're living in a last season winter wonderland.

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Barry, You're living in a last season winter wonderland.

And you need to get into the real world

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Well said Chuckles,agree with you here though its only his point of view.Me,I'll just call him a silly c**t and have done with it.

As Barry said yesterday, stop Talking out of your arse

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Barry, You're living in a last season winter wonderland.

Well, seeing as we haven't made any signings yet, it's the last evidence we can go by.

West ham will most likhtly be our rivals, What is our record signing compared to west ham?

Westham will most likghtly be our rivals, What is our record signingcompared to west ham?

Since when did record signings give any teams an edge over another? Our current record is 4million... I dare say that will be broken this summer though..

Although, here's something. Jacks finished 9th, QPR were relegated.. Guess who had the bigger "record signing"?

Westham will most likghtly be our rivals, What is our record signingcompared to west ham?

Since when did record signings give any teams an edge over another? Our current record is 4million... I dare say that will be broken this summer though..

Although, here's something. Jacks finished 9th, QPR were relegated.. Guess who had the bigger "record signing"?

Barry i take your point BUT increasingly money spent and results are correlated. That's how the modern game is going. The statistics back this up.

And To give this thread it's special rebrand flavour for pontyclun_blue, We've got a billionaire with supposed massive plans for Cardiff yet our record signing is 4 million? It may well be broken this summer but not in the Andy Carrol league. By his standards he's trying to do things on the cheap, including his kits.

There, i feel better now i've mentioned the rebrand in a post.

Westham will most likghtly be our rivals, What is our record signingcompared to west ham?

Since when did record signings give any teams an edge over another? Our current record is 4million... I dare say that will be broken this summer though..

Although, here's something. Jacks finished 9th, QPR were relegated.. Guess who had the bigger "record signing"?

Barry i take your point BUT increasingly money spent and results are correlated. That's how the modern game is going. The statistics back this up.

And To give this thread it's special rebrand flavour for pontyclun_blue, We've got a billionaire with supposed massive plans for Cardiff yet our record signing is 4 million? It may well be broken this summer but not in the Andy Carrol league. By his standards he's trying to do things on the cheap, including his kits.

There, i feel better now i've mentioned the rebrand in a post.

You turned it into a rebrand post at the start, that was the beginning of the end for it. You just can't leave a non rebrand post alone, and that makes the forum a worse place

Barry i take your point BUT increasingly money spent and results are correlated. That's how the modern game is going. The statistics back this up.

Yes, of course.. Last year for Cardiff City will also back this up. Are you seriously suggesting that the money we spent last season was "doing it the cheap way"?

And To give this thread it's special rebrand flavour for pontyclun_blue, We've got a billionaire with supposed massive plans for Cardiff yet our record signing is 4 million? It may well be broken this summer but not in the Andy Carrol league.

because we haven't actually signed anyone yet? Come back in September & if he hasn't spent much, then maybe some more will agree with you. It was documented that Malky had money to spend in January, he just didn't want to.

By his standards he's trying to do things on the cheap, including his kits.

his standards actually were set quite high last season.

There, i feel better now i've mentioned the rebrand in a post.

Westham will most likghtly be our rivals, What is our record signingcompared to west ham?

Since when did record signings give any teams an edge over another? Our current record is 4million... I dare say that will be broken this summer though..

Although, here's something. Jacks finished 9th, QPR were relegated.. Guess who had the bigger "record signing"?

Barry i take your point BUT increasingly money spent and results are correlated. That's how the modern game is going. The statistics back this up.

And To give this thread it's special rebrand flavour for pontyclun_blue, We've got a billionaire with supposed massive plans for Cardiff yet our record signing is 4 million? It may well be broken this summer but not in the Andy Carrol league. By his standards he's trying to do things on the cheap, including his kits.

There, i feel better now i've mentioned the rebrand in a post.

You turned it into a rebrand post at the start, that was the beginning of the end for it. You just can't leave a non rebrand post alone, and that makes the forum a worse place

Fair point PB, but it was linked to Tans transfer activity. Which doesn't match his talk.

Westham will most likghtly be our rivals, What is our record signingcompared to west ham?

Since when did record signings give any teams an edge over another? Our current record is 4million... I dare say that will be broken this summer though..

Although, here's something. Jacks finished 9th, QPR were relegated.. Guess who had the bigger "record signing"?

Barry i take your point BUT increasingly money spent and results are correlated. That's how the modern game is going. The statistics back this up.

And To give this thread it's special rebrand flavour for pontyclun_blue, We've got a billionaire with supposed massive plans for Cardiff yet our record signing is 4 million? It may well be broken this summer but not in the Andy Carrol league. By his standards he's trying to do things on the cheap, including his kits.

There, i feel better now i've mentioned the rebrand in a post.

You turned it into a rebrand post at the start, that was the beginning of the end for it. You just can't leave a non rebrand post alone, and that makes the forum a worse place

Fair point PB, but it was linked to Tans transfer activity. Which doesn't match his talk.

Can't say that yet, well over 2months to go yet, I think we bought well for the C'ship as coming top showed

Tan has already allocated a budget of 25mil, Not sure if that includes wages but it's quite a small kitty for a billionaire with 80 mil sky money and supposed big plans. I'm just giving a bit of perspectiv to the Tan sychofants/moneyworshippers

Tans biggest asset seems to be the manager and the set up MM has built. a bad start from Malky coupled with increased attention from the media could well reveal an even nuttier side to VT, managerial merry-go-round by november is not out of the question with our classless owner

Tan has already allocated a budget of 25mil, Not sure if that includes wages but it's quite a small kitty for a billionaire with 80 mil sky money and supposed big plans. I'm just giving a bit of perspectiv to the Tan sychofants/moneyworshippers

Tans biggest asset seems to be the manager and the set up MM has built. a bad start from Malky coupled with increased attention from the media could well reveal an even nuttier side to VT, managerial merry-go-round by november is not out of the question with our classless owner

But Malky will bring in the players he wants, not Tan, is the 25 mil for def or just hear say??

Tan has already allocated a budget of 25mil, Not sure if that includes wages but it's quite a small kitty for a billionaire with 80 mil sky money and supposed big plans. I'm just giving a bit of perspectiv to the Tan sychofants/moneyworshippers

Tans biggest asset seems to be the manager and the set up MM has built. a bad start from Malky coupled with increased attention from the media could well reveal an even nuttier side to VT, managerial merry-go-round by november is not out of the question with our classless owner

But Malky will bring in the players he wants, not Tan, is the 25 mil for def or just hear say??

That's how it should be, but for instance, if VT wants an asian or chinese player starting. Do you honestly think MM can argue?

After the promotion VT said 25 mil, i think.

Barry i take your point BUT increasingly money spent and results are correlated. That's how the modern game is going. The statistics back this up.

Yes, of course.. Last year for Cardiff City will also back this up. Are you seriously suggesting that the money we spent last season was "doing it the cheap way"?

And To give this thread it's special rebrand flavour for pontyclun_blue, We've got a billionaire with supposed massive plans for Cardiff yet our record signing is 4 million? It may well be broken this summer but not in the Andy Carrol league.

because we haven't actually signed anyone yet? Come back in September & if he hasn't spent much, then maybe some more will agree with you. It was documented that Malky had money to spend in January, he just didn't want to.

By his standards he's trying to do things on the cheap, including his kits.

his standards actually were set quite high last season.

There, i feel better now i've mentioned the rebrand in a post.

It's 25 Mil Barry, is that cheap or not?

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

The phrase your looking for is "give your head a wobble"


But yes you are right, what an absolutely stupid post by really blue really

West ham paid 15 million, we couldn't dream of matching that, yet Vincent Tan has big plans? He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart.

Jesus Christ. Give yourself a shake. Rebrand aside, Tan has been great for this club. The signings we made last season were hardly "on the cheap".

Well said Chuckles,agree with you here though its only his point of view.Me,I'll just call him a silly c**t and have done with it.

As Barry said yesterday, stop Talking out of your arse

If I'm talking out of my arse then you are a complete REM".He's just trying to do it on the cheap while ripping the club apart."WOT PLANET ARE YOU ON

Andy Carroll is very overrated and I'd be fuming if we signed somebody like him on a SIX year deal on £100k a week!

He's the young chap that Hudson had in his pocket in the League Cup Final