Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:05 pm
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:07 pm
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:08 pm
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:12 pm
arri potta wrote:I understood some of this was subject to remaining in the premiership?
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:24 pm
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:26 pm
eddiep wrote:Carl
Many thanks for the update.
Much appreciated as always.
You take the time to write and have the due tact not to
Put club or dealings in jeopardy when you know of titbits.
You did post yesterday in preparation.
Really dissapointing some of the posts on ur update thread.
I'm not in the trust or ITK.
You lakey and others are most welcome -
If people want to pour tar on -its easy
You could not post at all - just reply like them stating how
u knew and it is old news etc
Fuk em mate
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:31 pm
carlccfc wrote:eddiep wrote:Carl
Many thanks for the update.
Much appreciated as always.
You take the time to write and have the due tact not to
Put club or dealings in jeopardy when you know of titbits.
You did post yesterday in preparation.
Really dissapointing some of the posts on ur update thread.
I'm not in the trust or ITK.
You lakey and others are most welcome -
If people want to pour tar on -its easy
You could not post at all - just reply like them stating how
u knew and it is old news etc
Fuk em mate
As you say Eddie not everyone gets to hear what the Trust members get to hear, I alerted people yesterday that I would be putting out news and I had planned on doing so tomorrow evening, I did not have the right to post it until confirmation thta it was not confidential. That has upset some folk but I can't please everyone.
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:41 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:carlccfc wrote:eddiep wrote:Carl
Many thanks for the update.
Much appreciated as always.
You take the time to write and have the due tact not to
Put club or dealings in jeopardy when you know of titbits.
You did post yesterday in preparation.
Really dissapointing some of the posts on ur update thread.
I'm not in the trust or ITK.
You lakey and others are most welcome -
If people want to pour tar on -its easy
You could not post at all - just reply like them stating how
u knew and it is old news etc
Fuk em mate
As you say Eddie not everyone gets to hear what the Trust members get to hear, I alerted people yesterday that I would be putting out news and I had planned on doing so tomorrow evening, I did not have the right to post it until confirmation thta it was not confidential. That has upset some folk but I can't please everyone.
I don't think people are "upset" it just looked a bit weird.
We were reading this email off the trust, then all of a sudden it was deleted then a few minutes later you released an update (which to most people is inside knowledge not public domain stuff) which was almost word for word.
Even to you that sequence of events must look a bit "odd"
Not saying it is what you intended but it "looked" like the trust email was deleted so you could claim some sort of credit for the info.
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:47 pm
carlccfc wrote:I was waiting until tomorrow to put the update out after checking if what was contained in it was confidential, I was told this afternoon that it was fine to put it out and I was unaware whilst typing that that the trust was also putting it out today.
Had I known sooner it was not confidential then the update would have gone out sooner.
I wrote in the teaser yesterday that the news would be 'Bigger and Better'.
Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:48 pm
Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:16 pm
Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:28 pm
CantonJack wrote:Carl, will new seats be added before the new season? I don't really understand the first phase. I always thought the corners were being filled in to take us to just over 27000 is summer.
Also, will a new tier be out above the Ninian for the roof to be raised?
Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:37 pm
carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:carlccfc wrote:eddiep wrote:Carl
Many thanks for the update.
Much appreciated as always.
You take the time to write and have the due tact not to
Put club or dealings in jeopardy when you know of titbits.
You did post yesterday in preparation.
Really dissapointing some of the posts on ur update thread.
I'm not in the trust or ITK.
You lakey and others are most welcome -
If people want to pour tar on -its easy
You could not post at all - just reply like them stating how
u knew and it is old news etc
Fuk em mate
As you say Eddie not everyone gets to hear what the Trust members get to hear, I alerted people yesterday that I would be putting out news and I had planned on doing so tomorrow evening, I did not have the right to post it until confirmation thta it was not confidential. That has upset some folk but I can't please everyone.
I don't think people are "upset" it just looked a bit weird.
We were reading this email off the trust, then all of a sudden it was deleted then a few minutes later you released an update (which to most people is inside knowledge not public domain stuff) which was almost word for word.
Even to you that sequence of events must look a bit "odd"
Not saying it is what you intended but it "looked" like the trust email was deleted so you could claim some sort of credit for the info.
I was posting my update and when I hit submit I seen the comments about the Trust email to its members. Nothing to do with me taking credit Craig, I am just passing on info I was told.
In the past this site would have been criticised for putting out the trust email
Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:44 pm
dannyblue wrote:carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:carlccfc wrote:eddiep wrote:Carl
Many thanks for the update.
Much appreciated as always.
You take the time to write and have the due tact not to
Put club or dealings in jeopardy when you know of titbits.
You did post yesterday in preparation.
Really dissapointing some of the posts on ur update thread.
I'm not in the trust or ITK.
You lakey and others are most welcome -
If people want to pour tar on -its easy
You could not post at all - just reply like them stating how
u knew and it is old news etc
Fuk em mate
As you say Eddie not everyone gets to hear what the Trust members get to hear, I alerted people yesterday that I would be putting out news and I had planned on doing so tomorrow evening, I did not have the right to post it until confirmation thta it was not confidential. That has upset some folk but I can't please everyone.
I don't think people are "upset" it just looked a bit weird.
We were reading this email off the trust, then all of a sudden it was deleted then a few minutes later you released an update (which to most people is inside knowledge not public domain stuff) which was almost word for word.
Even to you that sequence of events must look a bit "odd"
Not saying it is what you intended but it "looked" like the trust email was deleted so you could claim some sort of credit for the info.
I was posting my update and when I hit submit I seen the comments about the Trust email to its members. Nothing to do with me taking credit Craig, I am just passing on info I was told.
In the past this site would have been criticised for putting out the trust email
Why the criticism ? when there are a number of Trust members who read and participate on this site. I fail to see the need to delete it anyway.
Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:56 pm
carlccfc wrote:dannyblue wrote:carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:carlccfc wrote:eddiep wrote:Carl
Many thanks for the update.
Much appreciated as always.
You take the time to write and have the due tact not to
Put club or dealings in jeopardy when you know of titbits.
You did post yesterday in preparation.
Really dissapointing some of the posts on ur update thread.
I'm not in the trust or ITK.
You lakey and others are most welcome -
If people want to pour tar on -its easy
You could not post at all - just reply like them stating how
u knew and it is old news etc
Fuk em mate
As you say Eddie not everyone gets to hear what the Trust members get to hear, I alerted people yesterday that I would be putting out news and I had planned on doing so tomorrow evening, I did not have the right to post it until confirmation thta it was not confidential. That has upset some folk but I can't please everyone.
I don't think people are "upset" it just looked a bit weird.
We were reading this email off the trust, then all of a sudden it was deleted then a few minutes later you released an update (which to most people is inside knowledge not public domain stuff) which was almost word for word.
Even to you that sequence of events must look a bit "odd"
Not saying it is what you intended but it "looked" like the trust email was deleted so you could claim some sort of credit for the info.
I was posting my update and when I hit submit I seen the comments about the Trust email to its members. Nothing to do with me taking credit Craig, I am just passing on info I was told.
In the past this site would have been criticised for putting out the trust email
Why the criticism ? when there are a number of Trust members who read and participate on this site. I fail to see the need to delete it anyway.
Because in the past posters have criticised such things, I did not delete the post anyway.