Wed May 22, 2013 4:07 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:13 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:18 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:20 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:23 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:24 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:30 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:41 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:42 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:44 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 4:47 pm
redordead wrote:Call it what you like Cardiff are moving in the right direction.
Wed May 22, 2013 4:48 pm
Blue_Always wrote:Like many, Borley says how bad it was, How intolerable it was, yet 30 years later he's still addicted. Why did he catch the bug initially if it were that bad? Lets face it, footballs attraction was the chaos, a place to meet people from all walks of life, It represented a deviation from normal social rules. a place where you could live on your wits and feel alive for doing so. These days you are banned for leaking a swear word at a heated moment of play. Modern football is purely about commerce and this myopic approach is killing the geese that layed the golden egg.
If you ask me football is dying, the amount of youth going to live games regulary, has dropped off since sky. The amount of nutters/characters from council estates is dropping off due to pricing, The games outlook is extremely short term As with everything capatalism touches.
Wed May 22, 2013 4:53 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Like many, Borley says how bad it was, How intolerable it was, yet 30 years later he's still addicted. Why did he catch the bug initially if it were that bad? Lets face it, footballs attraction was the chaos, a place to meet people from all walks of life, It represented a deviation from normal social rules. a place where you could live on your wits and feel alive for doing so. These days you are banned for leaking a swear word at a heated moment of play. Modern football is purely about commerce and this myopic approach is killing the geese that layed the golden egg.
If you ask me football is dying, the amount of youth going to live games regulary, has dropped off since sky. The amount of nutters/characters from council estates is dropping off due to pricing, The games outlook is extremely short term As with everything capatalism touches.
A lot of people just wanted to watch their team play football
Wed May 22, 2013 5:00 pm
Blue_Always wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Like many, Borley says how bad it was, How intolerable it was, yet 30 years later he's still addicted. Why did he catch the bug initially if it were that bad? Lets face it, footballs attraction was the chaos, a place to meet people from all walks of life, It represented a deviation from normal social rules. a place where you could live on your wits and feel alive for doing so. These days you are banned for leaking a swear word at a heated moment of play. Modern football is purely about commerce and this myopic approach is killing the geese that layed the golden egg.
If you ask me football is dying, the amount of youth going to live games regulary, has dropped off since sky. The amount of nutters/characters from council estates is dropping off due to pricing, The games outlook is extremely short term As with everything capatalism touches.
A lot of people just wanted to watch their team play football
I don't recall anybody leaving the ground saying they couldn't see their team play.
Wed May 22, 2013 5:01 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 5:24 pm
CityGent wrote:Some of the sarcastic pricks on that thread have extremely short or selective memories. Steve Borley has done more for this club than all the anonymous trolls put together and is more Cardiff than the majority of us and has risked a hell of a lot more
I was proud to shake his hand recently, and just to say"Thank you".
Wed May 22, 2013 5:34 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 6:11 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 6:13 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 6:14 pm
Wed May 22, 2013 6:29 pm
BigGwynram wrote:I'm sure Steve like most of us would rather we play in Blue, but he is closer to the sharp end and knows what was at risk.
he has more than proven his credentials and love for the club, like the huge majority of us who still attend he could be classed as a reluctant red.
Also like all of us, I'm sure he love to have a Dave Whelan or Jack walker type local billionaire fan running things, but where were they when he had his livelihood and house on the line, how many stepped up to help then.Surely Steve has gone along with things reluctantly possibly, because he knows that was the best option, if not the only viable on that would keep us alive and playing in the football League set up.
Wed May 22, 2013 6:35 pm
Blue_Always wrote:redordead wrote:Call it what you like Cardiff are moving in the right direction.
Away from the fans
Wed May 22, 2013 6:45 pm
Gonzo wrote:Agree with everything Steve has said.
We had to move on or be left behind (although some would apparently have preferred that).
I can now take my daughters to watch Cardiff City with their mothers blessing, would never have happened back at NP or during our dark days when trouble followed us wherever we went.
Football is now for families and not just a lads day out to get pissed up, shout abuse and fight one another.
Wed May 22, 2013 6:47 pm
rontom wrote:Gonzo wrote:Agree with everything Steve has said.
We had to move on or be left behind (although some would apparently have preferred that).
I can now take my daughters to watch Cardiff City with their mothers blessing, would never have happened back at NP or during our dark days when trouble followed us wherever we went.
Football is now for families and not just a lads day out to get pissed up, shout abuse and fight one another.
And there lies the reason why only 300 fans turned up at Rochdale
Wed May 22, 2013 6:54 pm
castleblue wrote:I have a great deal of respect for Steve Borley and agree with almost all that he has written there but in my opinion the most interesting thing he says is " What is the modern football they want to protest about".
In my opinion that banner which was put up on a thread yesterday was at best inappropriate for an event intended to highlight the importance of "Blue" to Cardiff City and at worst imappropriate in terms on content i.e. is the rebrand a consquence of what people consider "Modern Football" values.
Anyone who watched football during the era Steve is talking about would remember some, if not all, of the things he is talking about. However given the advancements in pitch design and maintenance today compared to 40 years ago are we really talking "Modern Football"
As someone who can remember the days when only the "Champion" clubs took part in the European Cup or only the "Cup Winners" took part in the European Cup Winners Cup, and those competitions were simple knock out, nowadays I look on the Champions League and Europa League Competitions as representing the very worst values of "Modern Football". As I see it the major driving force behind these competitions in "Money".
Again in my opinion most football fans would agree that the one thing that they hate about "Modern Football" is the "Money, Money, Money" culture which infects the game. At the end of the day the rebrand of our club last season was driven by "Money" by the almost endless search for the next pound, Why? because we are told if your not in the Premier League you are no one.
Whatever the reasons behind the rebrand we were all told it was to try and find "New Revenue" streams in overseas market places and to help we needed to accept the rebranding of our club.
In my opinion Steve that's the type of "Modern Football" values that banner was objecting to, the use of the term "F**k Modern Football" was wrong and again in my opinion spoils the message that these people are trying to put across.
I like many other fans could probably list a dozen reasons why I dislike "Modern Football", or rather the values that modern football portrays, but I bet one thing would be common amongst the list "Money".
That's "Modern Football" Steve driven by money and it cost our club it's traditional colours and almost cost us the "Bluebird".
So Steve instead of writing about the many improvements that have been made just remember what it sounded like when the vast majority at the Bolton game were singing "We're Cardiff City We'll Always Be Blue" . That is the very best piece of market research our club could have on the rebrand and as a board member realise that your customers appreciate all the improvements but disagree with the rebrand, and what caused it - the "Money" first value of "Modern Football".
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wed May 22, 2013 7:09 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:
I was under the impression the rebrand was to attract more revenue but listening to the latest interviews from Tan it was mainly to give us luck.
I have always believed the Modern game would attract the big business men because of its status and now money. I certainly felt a club like Cardiff would become a prime picking once it got its act sorted. Well my beliefs and feeling were 99% right. I just did not expect us to attract a nutter. Then again looking at the fans through the years perhaps it is what we deserve.
Wed May 22, 2013 7:21 pm
castleblue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:
I was under the impression the rebrand was to attract more revenue but listening to the latest interviews from Tan it was mainly to give us luck.
I have always believed the Modern game would attract the big business men because of its status and now money. I certainly felt a club like Cardiff would become a prime picking once it got its act sorted. Well my beliefs and feeling were 99% right. I just did not expect us to attract a nutter. Then again looking at the fans through the years perhaps it is what we deserve.
This rebrand was always about-"exploiting and maximising its brand and commercial revenues in international markets, which it is hoped in turn will bring success to the club locally, whilst also attracting new partners and investors."
I really believe that all that "Lucky Red" and "The Dragon Protecting The Bluebird" is nonsense, and VT knows it, and was nothing more than VT trying to stop the fans singing "We're Cardiff City We'll Always Be Blue".
And he thought that would work, the guy is a nutter.
I don't think the guy is a nutter, far from it, but he has made a rod for his own back here and sooner rather than later he will backtrack and return us to Blue.
When he finds a way of doing it without losing face.
Without losing face being the operative sentence here. Can't see it happening unless the rebrand is a total flop in the Far East then just then there is a possibility of returning to blue.
![]()
![]()
Wed May 22, 2013 7:45 pm
CityGent wrote:Some of the sarcastic pricks on that thread have extremely short or selective memories. Steve Borley has done more for this club than all the anonymous trolls put together and is more Cardiff than the majority of us and has risked a hell of a lot more
I was proud to shake his hand recently, and just to say"Thank you".
Wed May 22, 2013 8:28 pm
Blue_Always wrote:redordead wrote:Call it what you like Cardiff are moving in the right direction.
Away from the fans
Wed May 22, 2013 8:53 pm
castleblue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:
I was under the impression the rebrand was to attract more revenue but listening to the latest interviews from Tan it was mainly to give us luck.
I have always believed the Modern game would attract the big business men because of its status and now money. I certainly felt a club like Cardiff would become a prime picking once it got its act sorted. Well my beliefs and feeling were 99% right. I just did not expect us to attract a nutter. Then again looking at the fans through the years perhaps it is what we deserve.
This rebrand was always about-"exploiting and maximising its brand and commercial revenues in international markets, which it is hoped in turn will bring success to the club locally, whilst also attracting new partners and investors."
I really believe that all that "Lucky Red" and "The Dragon Protecting The Bluebird" is nonsense, and VT knows it, and was nothing more than VT trying to stop the fans singing "We're Cardiff City We'll Always Be Blue".
I don't think the guy is a nutter, far from it, but he has made a rod for his own back here and sooner rather than later he will backtrack and return us to Blue.
When he finds a way of doing it without losing face.
![]()
![]()