Jack scum sign Brad Johnson for 4.2m from norwich

What do you think about the scums new signing??

Good player

Who cares? We're in the prem, we've got better things to be thinking about than those cunts.

Very average

According to the Daily Mail that is.

Whilst Norwich have stated that the reports are untrue

"McNally took to Twitter to describe the Daily Mail reports of a deal with Swansea as “completely untrue”. He added: “We are not in discussions with any club about the sale/potential sale of any first team player. OK?”

http://www.edp24.co.uk/mobile/sport/nor ... _1_2188417

I'd be surprised if we signed him, as he's not a Laudrup type of player, we've already signed Jose Canas and are likely to sign Jonathan De Guzman for £5 million.

Very average

oxymoron , and we haven't signed johnson either

Who cares? We're in the prem, we've got better things to be thinking about than those cunts.

....like worrying who your manager will be next season

What do you think about the scums new signing??

Underwhelming. At best, Bradley Johnson is an average jobbing Championship player. £4.2 mill. Doubtful.

Can't see jacks wasting that sort of money on him.

However, I'd love this to be true!!

why use the word jacks sc..........i cringe, i wish people will grow up. brain dead some people are, walking zombies, jacks,jacks the first word they think about.

jacks,jacks,jacks and more jacks. bunch of zombies from the walking dead on here.

Who cares? We're in the prem, we've got better things to be thinking about than those cunts.

....like worrying who your manager will be next season

Still on here are you ?

Very average

oxymoron , and we haven't signed johnson either

Re: Jacks not impressed with our lads
by waddle » Tue May 07, 2013 7:30 am
what a cringeworthy thread ! we have nothing sensible to argue about anymore fellas so i'll see you in august when your embarrassment begins

What happened to August

Yea why use the tern Jack scum?


















I prefer Jack C**t

Very average

oxymoron , and we haven't signed johnson either

Re: Jacks not impressed with our lads
by waddle » Tue May 07, 2013 7:30 am
what a cringeworthy thread ! we have nothing sensible to argue about anymore fellas so i'll see you in august when your embarrassment begins

What happened to August

have already answered that keep up ffs

Very average

oxymoron , and we haven't signed johnson either

Re: Jacks not impressed with our lads
by waddle » Tue May 07, 2013 7:30 am
what a cringeworthy thread ! we have nothing sensible to argue about anymore fellas so i'll see you in august when your embarrassment begins

What happened to August

have already answered that keep up ffs

brain dead. jacks,jacks, bunch of zombies,jacks,jacks

Dirty jack basta rds

a lot of role models on here for younger generation. chavs i bet!!