Wed May 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Wed May 01, 2013 2:25 pm
Wed May 01, 2013 2:38 pm
Wed May 01, 2013 2:42 pm
Wed May 01, 2013 2:43 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Wish mods would delete these topics, 3 players a day are being touted by our fans!
Wed May 01, 2013 2:48 pm
MrEvans wrote:He's an excellent work horse but is shit at finishing. Fergie's had him in a wing role more than a striker. Just a younger Jamie Mackie. At least if we signed Jamie Mackie he'd consistently work hard while Welbeck goes missing a lot and can be prone to laziness.
Wed May 01, 2013 2:48 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Wish mods would delete these topics, 3 players a day are being touted by our fans!
i dont know who is worse, the poster who reckons we could sign him, or the one who thinks he like jamie mackie
Wed May 01, 2013 3:09 pm
Wed May 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Wed May 01, 2013 3:26 pm
Wed May 01, 2013 3:39 pm
paulh_85 wrote:dear god, is this the shit we are going to have to put up with for the next 4 months?
Wed May 01, 2013 3:43 pm
Caerdydd12 wrote:on loan yay or nay?
Could be possible if Man Utd get a striker in.
Wed May 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Thu May 02, 2013 9:35 am
Thu May 02, 2013 10:13 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Wish mods would delete these topics, 3 players a day are being touted by our fans!
i dont know who is worse, the poster who reckons we could sign him, or the one who thinks he like jamie mackie
For once I am agreement with this pleb
Thu May 02, 2013 10:36 am
Thu May 02, 2013 10:42 am
MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
Thu May 02, 2013 10:49 am
Thu May 02, 2013 11:19 am
MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
Thu May 02, 2013 11:35 am
Thu May 02, 2013 11:37 am
Kanester wrote:MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
Your joking right? Welbeck playes for Manchester Utd my friend, how can you even say these things?
He wouldnt even come to us, besides he would have 3\4 of the league after him.
Thu May 02, 2013 11:41 am
MrEvans wrote:Kanester wrote:MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
Your joking right? Welbeck playes for Manchester Utd my friend, how can you even say these things?
He wouldnt even come to us, besides he would have 3\4 of the league after him.
So does Bebe, Scott Sinclair plays for Manchester City,![]()
![]()
![]()
And I can say it very easily...
van Persie players the same psoition as Fraizer Campbell.
David Marshall plays the same position as Joe Hart.
Welbeck plays a similar game to Mackie in supporting the striker as an engine at the top of the pitch. Simple.
Both run around a ot and both don't score very often.
Thu May 02, 2013 11:45 am
MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
Thu May 02, 2013 11:45 am
Thu May 02, 2013 11:49 am
CraigCCFC wrote:Can we file this with the Berbatov and picking up TG and Vinny at the airport threads.
Thu May 02, 2013 12:06 pm
Thu May 02, 2013 12:13 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
F.uck off on one of your adventures Tin Tin you are making a fool of yourself here.
Thu May 02, 2013 12:15 pm
Thu May 02, 2013 12:17 pm
MrEvans wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
F.uck off on one of your adventures Tin Tin you are making a fool of yourself here.
By saying two players play the same position?
Or the fact I'd rather a player at the club on a permanent basis who'd work hard day in, day out than a young player who'll f**k off at the end of the season and isn't committed?![]()
Thu May 02, 2013 12:22 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:MrEvans wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:MrEvans wrote:Welbeck 46 apps 5 goals
Mackie 36 apps 2 goals
Welbeck is no doubt the much better player, but both players have played a very similar role or Welbeck taking up the wing. Welbeck is no doubt going to be a huge player, but at the moment I'd rather Jamie Mackie on permanent than on Welbeck on a loan.
F.uck off on one of your adventures Tin Tin you are making a fool of yourself here.
By saying two players play the same position?
Or the fact I'd rather a player at the club on a permanent basis who'd work hard day in, day out than a young player who'll f**k off at the end of the season and isn't committed?![]()
Im sure you know better than Fergie pal. What an absolute clown.![]()
![]()