Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 2:39 pm

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/ind ... c=305346.0


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 2:47 pm

Hahaha! Some of their reactions are class! :lol: :lol:

Wtf did they expect? He's f**king vile and deserves it! Horrible cretin

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:01 pm

Its a ridiculous decision. If that happened to one of our players id be livid.

The FA gave Terry 6 games for calling a pro a f*cking black c**t.

Suarez gets a 10 game ban for biting.

So apparently biting is worse than racism that has historical links going back years and years.

What message does that send out to kids? dont bite players just racially abuse them instead as the punishment wont be so severe.

Well done to the FA on undermining racism. 10/10 for the morons.

I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth but this decision is ridiculous and ruins the work done by anti racism campaigners in football.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:02 pm

Totally deserved.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:09 pm

All Black Everything. wrote:Its a ridiculous decision. If that happened to one of our players id be livid.

The FA gave Terry 6 games for calling a pro a f*cking black c**t.

Suarez gets a 10 game ban for biting.

So apparently biting is worse than racism that has historical links going back years and years.

What message does that send out to kids? dont bite players just racially abuse them instead as the punishment wont be so severe.

Well done to the FA on undermining racism. 10/10 for the morons.

I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth but this decision is ridiculous and ruins the work done by anti racism campaigners in football.



Name calling is worse than a physical attack?
Was it a racial attack as the pro footballer he bit was white/different nationality, so far worse than just saying something?
What part of the name calling is the worst? Didn't the other pro footballer start it all by calling him names/remarks about his personal life?

Suraez should have got a longer ban imo.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:12 pm

abergblue wrote:Name calling is worse than a physical attack?
Was it a racial attack as the pro footballer he bit was white/different nationality, so far worse than just saying something?
What part of the name calling is the worst? Didn't the other pro footballer start it all by calling him names/remarks about his personal life?

Suraez should have got a longer ban imo.


Suarez racism = 8 games
Terry racism = 6 games
Suarez biting = 10 games
Defoe biting = yellow card

Hardly surprising that Liverpool fans are pissed off when the FA are so inconsistent.

The FA have a duty to football to be consistent in their rulings to set an example just as the judicial system do for society for its own good cause. The FA's inconsistencies set the wrong example totally.

The FA have one defence tomorrow and only one defence and that is that this is his third total offence and they are using a totting up system so every time he gets in more trouble the penalty will be more severe.

1) Biting in Holland
2) The racism incident

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:28 pm

All Black Everything. wrote:
abergblue wrote:Name calling is worse than a physical attack?
Was it a racial attack as the pro footballer he bit was white/different nationality, so far worse than just saying something?
What part of the name calling is the worst? Didn't the other pro footballer start it all by calling him names/remarks about his personal life?

Suraez should have got a longer ban imo.


Suarez racism = 8 games
Terry racism = 6 games
Suarez biting = 10 games
Defoe biting = yellow card

Hardly surprising that Liverpool fans are pissed off when the FA are so inconsistent.

The FA have a duty to football to be consistent in their rulings to set an example just as the judicial system do for society for its own good cause. The FA's inconsistencies set the wrong example totally.

The FA have one defence tomorrow and only one defence and that is that this is his third total offence and they are using a totting up system so every time he gets in more trouble the penalty will be more severe.

1) Biting in Holland
2) The racism incident



Agree with you. They are inconsistent, and it does depend on the player concerned.
FA are too inconsistent and media controlled in their punishments (appears so anyway)
Still laugh at it now, but find it so embarrassing for the sport of football.
I did not know about the Defoe incident, but he does get away with a lot. He is a diving cheat, but never gets punished, whereas Bale gets the bad rep. AVB even said this.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:18 pm

The FA got is spot on.

You cannot compare bans like for like. This ban for Suarez takes into account previous behaviour and boy has he been a dick.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:27 pm

All Black Everything. wrote:
abergblue wrote:Name calling is worse than a physical attack?
Was it a racial attack as the pro footballer he bit was white/different nationality, so far worse than just saying something?
What part of the name calling is the worst? Didn't the other pro footballer start it all by calling him names/remarks about his personal life?

Suraez should have got a longer ban imo.


Suarez racism = 8 games
Terry racism = 6 games
Suarez biting = 10 games
Defoe biting = yellow card

Hardly surprising that Liverpool fans are pissed off when the FA are so inconsistent.

The FA have a duty to football to be consistent in their rulings to set an example just as the judicial system do for society for its own good cause. The FA's inconsistencies set the wrong example totally.

The FA have one defence tomorrow and only one defence and that is that this is his third total offence and they are using a totting up system so every time he gets in more trouble the penalty will be more severe.

1) Biting in Holland
2) The racism incident


May be wrong but as defies was dealt with on the pitch at the time I don't think the fa can give any further punishment ?
I thought if its dealt with that's it , if its missed the fa can react afterwards ?
I think 10games is bang on personally , the next time should be a season !

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:03 pm

Repeat offender so should get a longer ban, simple.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:13 pm

He's a dirty rat.
I can't wait till he's standing in front of the canton next season

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:26 pm

What the f**k did they expect? :lol:

Liverpool fans piss me off, they think it's never their fault for anything and they always think they're treated harshly compared to everyone else. They need to stop moaning and accept what they deserve.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:46 pm

JonCCFC wrote:What the f**k did they expect? :lol:

Liverpool fans piss me off, they think it's never their fault for anything and they always think they're treated harshly compared to everyone else. They need to stop moaning and accept what they deserve.



Always the victims. Never their fault.
Even Heysel wasn't their fault.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:16 pm

Wayne S wrote:The FA got is spot on.

You cannot compare bans like for like. This ban for Suarez takes into account previous behaviour and boy has he been a dick.




^^^^^This.

Suarez is lucky to just get 10 games for me. As for the Scousers reactions - did anyone expect anything different?

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:20 pm

He had a 7 game ban previous for biting and it obvious it didnt work. So it has been increased, maybe that will work.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:43 pm

Wayne S wrote:The FA got is spot on.

You cannot compare bans like for like. This ban for Suarez takes into account previous behaviour and boy has he been a dick.


Exactly this :ayatollah:

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:44 pm

All Black Everything. wrote:Its a ridiculous decision. If that happened to one of our players id be livid.

The FA gave Terry 6 games for calling a pro a f*cking black c**t.

Suarez gets a 10 game ban for biting.

So apparently biting is worse than racism that has historical links going back years and years.

What message does that send out to kids? dont bite players just racially abuse them instead as the punishment wont be so severe.

Well done to the FA on undermining racism. 10/10 for the morons.

I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth but this decision is ridiculous and ruins the work done by anti racism campaigners in football.

SO IF HE HAD BITTEN A BLACK MAN THAT WOULD OF MADE IT WORSE ? :laughing6:

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:00 pm

All Black Everything. wrote:I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth


High and mighty post that preaches about racism and then within 5 lines you are making derogatory comments about someones appearance, plonker.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:06 pm

evanmorgan wrote:
All Black Everything. wrote:I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth


High and mighty post that preaches about racism and then within 5 lines you are making derogatory comments about someones appearance, plonker.

Exactly Chief. Some high and mighty do gooders are just as bad as the one's they slate. :?

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:43 pm

If u bit someone in public and had previous for doing it, u'd get locked up for assault and being a complete nutter. Given a psychiatric assessment as ur a danger to the public and probably a danger to urself
Horrible little tart should of been sacked by Liverpool for bringing the club into disrepute.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:48 pm

Nuclearblue wrote:
evanmorgan wrote:
All Black Everything. wrote:I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth


High and mighty post that preaches about racism and then within 5 lines you are making derogatory comments about someones appearance, plonker.

Exactly Chief. Some high and mighty do gooders are just as bad as the one's they slate. :?


Come on, I thought everyone knew by now that Barnett takes whatever position he think is most likely to annoy people.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:38 pm

When will you realise Barnett is about as knowledgeable about football as Abu f*cking Qatada.

When you punch someone the first time you get a stretch in prison, say 6 months. Next time you do it you get a year. Why? Because you didn't learn the first time. Should have been more seeing as he refused to acknowledge that he had done something seriously wrong.

I urge you to watch it again, it's despicable and crazy behavious. He looked like a child/wild animal the way he grabbed Ivanovics arm. If he was a bluebird i'd be saying the same thing and feel that a harsh ban is warranted. I Will say though that the calls for Liverpool to sell him over this are ludicrous.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:08 am

evanmorgan wrote:
All Black Everything. wrote:I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth


High and mighty post that preaches about racism and then within 5 lines you are making derogatory comments about someones appearance, plonker.


Are you comparing a remark about teeth to racial abuse that has historical connotations and links going far back? Wow, anyone who is stupid enough to do that really either does not understand how racism really is viewed or a bit ignorant of it. Racism is by far worse than such a discriminative remark. Maybe you should do some research into Apartheid, the black panther movement, MLK and Malcolm X before making such blase comparisons.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:29 am

All Black Everything. wrote:
evanmorgan wrote:
All Black Everything. wrote:I couldn't care less that its Suarez, he deserves a ban just for his teeth


High and mighty post that preaches about racism and then within 5 lines you are making derogatory comments about someones appearance, plonker.


Are you comparing a remark about teeth to racial abuse that has historical connotations and links going far back? Wow, anyone who is stupid enough to do that really either does not understand how racism really is viewed or a bit ignorant of it. Racism is by far worse than such a discriminative remark. Maybe you should do some research into Apartheid, the black panther movement, MLK and Malcolm X before making such blase comparisons.


Maybe you should get off your racist bandwagon, it's people like you who give genuine racism campaigners a bad name. Then again your tag "All Black Everything" says it all. Same old story anything done or said to anyone whose colour is slighly darker than white then it is racism. If a Welshman is called a f*cking sheepshagger, or a Scotsman a f*cking jock, or an Irishman a f*cking "paddy", then Oh it's ok it's just banter but call a Pakistani a f*cking paki or an african a f*cking nigger then it's racism is it? A white English man gets assaulted in Cardiff then it's just an assualt, but an Englishman with dark skin gets assualted in Cardiff then I suppose it's a racist attack is it?

Regarding Suarez he is a repeat offender regarding the biting and a racist along with being an obnoxious individual. What alot of football supporters seem to miss is the the example alot of footballers are setting to young children who watch the game. Racist actions, biting, falling over to get penalties, pretend injuries and trying to get other players sent off to name a few, really good examples to children, excellent roll models I think not. Football managers and officials like Liverpool's Brendan Rodgers and Ian Ayres then go to great lengths defending the likes of Suarez trying to have us believe he is a poor miss understood individual. Regarding one of our players biting another player then personally I would expect the club to terminate his contract. But off course you would be livid, I suppose if he got much more than a slapped wrist and a years supply of toothpaste and a contract to promote Sensodyne?

As for scousers being unhappy, well tough they always are if things are not going their way. Justice for the 96, yes I fully agree but they have always said that no Liverpool supporter contributed to the events on Leppings Lane that day, that I find to be total bullshit knowing what morons alot of them are. We never heard them shouting for justice for the 39 Juventus fans they contributed to dying at Heysel did we? How many other games have they tried to get into without tickets- Champions League Final against A C Milan in Athens comes to mind!!!

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:23 am

Suarez is lucky that he got off so lightly. He is a total disgrace. As for Liverpool, the usual pathetic bleating. No class whatsoever. Some things never change.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:18 am

reverendjames wrote:Maybe you should get off your racist bandwagon, it's people like you who give genuine racism campaigners a bad name. Then again your tag "All Black Everything" says it all. Same old story anything done or said to anyone whose colour is slighly darker than white then it is racism. If a Welshman is called a f*cking sheepshagger, or a Scotsman a f*cking jock, or an Irishman a f*cking "paddy", then Oh it's ok it's just banter but call a Pakistani a f*cking paki or an african a f*cking nigger then it's racism is it? A white English man gets assaulted in Cardiff then it's just an assualt, but an Englishman with dark skin gets assualted in Cardiff then I suppose it's a racist attack is it?


Jesus Christ, calm down. My name is the name of a song by Lupe Fiasco mate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71McnVwWPwU

Who said anything of the sort below, you're just going off on one now.

Regarding Suarez he is a repeat offender regarding the biting and a racist along with being an obnoxious individual. What alot of football supporters seem to miss is the the example alot of footballers are setting to young children who watch the game. Racist actions, biting, falling over to get penalties, pretend injuries and trying to get other players sent off to name a few, really good examples to children, excellent roll models I think not. Football managers and officials like Liverpool's Brendan Rodgers and Ian Ayres then go to great lengths defending the likes of Suarez trying to have us believe he is a poor miss understood individual. Regarding one of our players biting another player then personally I would expect the club to terminate his contract. But off course you would be livid, I suppose if he got much more than a slapped wrist and a years supply of toothpaste and a contract to promote Sensodyne?


1. THE FA SAID HIS PREVIOUS OFFENCES HAVE NOT BEEN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT
2. SUAREZ AINT THE ONLY PLAYER THERE TO SET AN EXAMPLE. THE FA AND OTHER PLAYERS ETC.
3. THE FA ARE QUITE KEEN ON FOREIGN PLAYERS COMING OVER TO HELP THEM LINE THEIR POCKETS YET ARE THE FIRST TO ABUSE THEM FOR THEIR CULTURES WHICH IS RIDICULOUS. THIS STUFF HAPPENS ALL THE TIME IN SOUTH AMERICA AS GARY NEVILLE RIGHTLY POINTED OUT. ITS NOTHING SURPRISING THERE. THE FA CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. OPEN YOUR DOORS TO FOREIGN PLAYERS AND EXPECT TO SEE PART OF THEIR CULTURE COME ACROSS TOO. SOMEONES UPBRINGING, CULTURE, WAY OF BEING DOESNT GET LEFT AT THE AIRPORT.

As for scousers being unhappy, well tough they always are if things are not going their way. Justice for the 96, yes I fully agree but they have always said that no Liverpool supporter contributed to the events on Leppings Lane that day, that I find to be total bullshit knowing what morons alot of them are. We never heard them shouting for justice for the 39 Juventus fans they contributed to dying at Heysel did we? How many other games have they tried to get into without tickets- Champions League Final against A C Milan in Athens comes to mind!!!


Bore off. If thats your view of Hillsborough then you clearly dont understand the full manner in how the events unfolded. :sleepy2:

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:28 am

At the end of the day, any club would stand by their star player. We all seen fergie and man utd stand by cantona after he attacked a palace fan in 1995. The closet united fans on here probably think cantona was innocent. This could very well be Suarez last chance by Liverpool though.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:58 am

So let me get this right if you act like a moron in your own country if you are invited to work in another country that country has to accept your moronic behaviour.

I supose you agree with some of the Brits who over the years have gone abroad wether it be on holiday or for football matches and take their moronic piss artist and hooligan culture with them, because of course they carnt leave it at the airport can they.

You no doubt support the immigrants who come to our country and expect to practice their culture without question but when we go to their country we have to abide by their rules and culture. Oh and by the way I have worked in Saudi Arabia, Africa and throughout Europe.

Also at the time of Hillsborough I lived in the Sheffield area and had friends in South Yorkshire police and knew other people who lived in the Hillsborough area.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:14 pm

reverendjames wrote:So let me get this right if you act like a moron in your own country if you are invited to work in another country that country has to accept your moronic behaviour.


Are you ignorant of cultures? In his country it is normal. Watch South American football and you will see spitting, biting, stamping, grabbing, worse diving, etc. you name it. Its one of the reasons I think Neymar would not cope as well as many think in Europe and I cant wait for him to move to be proved right.

The FA embrace immigration in the fullest because it helps keep the high profile up of the Premier League and the best players are granted work permits and come into the country. This helps them line their pockets. Unfortunately for them, just like the British idiots who go abroad and you have a minority who continue their British ways you will have the same inwards. The attitude of some British people is sickening. I can do what I like wherever I like but when they come here they must obey our rules. Now, if you were like taffyapple, someone who has lived around the world and obeys their rules and follows their ways I can understand them wanting the same but the FA are the ones who should be responsible for the transition of these foreign players, not the individual who knows know better because they are the ways of life he is accustomed too.

I supose you agree with some of the Brits who over the years have gone abroad wether it be on holiday or for football matches and take their moronic piss artist and hooligan culture with them, because of course they carnt leave it at the airport can they.


Plenty do leave it at the airport, plenty dont. Ive been to Benidorm and seen drunken swearing Brits peeing in the street like they would do here but thats a way of being they've taken over there and the same happens in Malia, Ibiza or whatever because there is a high influx of Brits. Some will go abroad and fit in or try too, others wont and will stick to what they know. Those coming into Britain are no different from us Brits going out. We're all human after all.

You no doubt support the immigrants who come to our country and expect to practice their culture without question but when we go to their country we have to abide by their rules and culture. Oh and by the way I have worked in Saudi Arabia, Africa and throughout Europe.


Countries like Saudi Arabia and Africa are not civilised nations though are they in total form like the UK, the US, Australia and other European countries? They have a lot of 'aspects' of their culture that go against what we deem right in the UK so its hardly surprising that countries like that try to force their ways upon you.

Go to Germany, practice what you want within reason. No different here. Go to Australia and do the same within tighter regulations. Its all about balance. The difference is those that come here to preach terrorism do so purposely to make a point and try and be the forefront of Islam or other religions. They do it for the attention and to whip up hysteria and they do it to spread hate. They know fully well what they are doing is evil and sickening but do it anyway in the name of their religion. What Suarez did was just a causative effect of the environment he grew up in. A human does not have on/off switches, you cant turn off his bite mode per se and he is suddenly well adapted to British culture.

Also at the time of Hillsborough I lived in the Sheffield area and had friends in South Yorkshire police and knew other people who lived in the Hillsborough area.


Fair enough but to say the people had any influence in the events that unfolded is ridiculous. It was poor crowd management, flow control and planning. It was the polices fault and possibly the governments but that has yet to be revealed as the documents haven't been released so that can't be said for definite yet, we'll have to wait and see.

Re: OHHH THE SCOUSERS ARE NOT HAPPY

Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:14 pm

murphy wrote:At the end of the day, any club would stand by their star player. We all seen fergie and man utd stand by cantona after he attacked a palace fan in 1995. The closet united fans on here probably think cantona was innocent. This could very well be Suarez last chance by Liverpool though.


Suarez will most likely leave in the summer. I would not be surprised if he was a target for Borussia now with the money they have after the sales of Gotze and Lewandowski.