O/T - Was the Boston bombings a false flag operation?

Ever since 9/11, and the huge differences between the official inquiry findings and many respected architechts, engineers etc. version of events, I've been very suspect of mainstream media claims when it comes to terrorism attacks amongst many other things.

The smoking gun for me with 9/11 was Building 7 being reported live on BBC News as having collapsed 22 minutes before it actually fell, along with the claims that an office fire brought it down.

As a result I try and source my "news" via independent internet sites and very rarely watch any mainstream news.

The following 8 minute link takes you to an alternative view of who may be responsible for the Boston bombings.

I'm not saying this is fact, and don't particularly agree with a lot of what Alex Jones spouts, but just thought I would open it up for discussion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axQtAFtmtVA

oh dear god

Really difficult to see the grassy gnoll on the mobile...

If you actually bothered to watch 'mainstream news' you would realise that this is utter drivel.

BBC are doing a great job in my opinion. Your logic of trusting 'independent' sites (that any wind-up merchant can post on/create) over a trusted, global, news organisation actually made me laugh.

If you actually bothered to watch 'mainstream news' you would realise that this is utter drivel.

BBC are doing a great job in my opinion. Your logic of trusting 'independent' sites (that any wind-up merchant can post on/create) over a trusted, global, news organisation actually made me laugh.

I'm glad I brought a smile to your face.

I tried to briefly describe my reasons for mistrust of mainstream media, the BBC example given being a very important point, but you ignored that element.

In my experience these sort of issues culminate in very polarised opinions.

Your statement of "a trusted, global, news organisation" is synonymous of the spin that the BBC put out themselves.

It's my opinion that the "average person", as if any average person ever existed as we are all different, is afraid to look beyond "trusted" and "established" forms of news as the truth can seem so unreal it will shatter their complete paradigm world view.

I'm undecided if the Boston bombings are false flag or not, but to trust mainstream media, essentially controlled by three individuals worldwide is folly at least and total ignorance at worst.

Ever since 9/11, and the huge differences between the official inquiry findings and many respected architechts, engineers etc. version of events, I've been very suspect of mainstream media claims when it comes to terrorism attacks amongst many other things.

The smoking gun for me with 9/11 was Building 7 being reported live on BBC News as having collapsed 22 minutes before it actually fell, along with the claims that an office fire brought it down.

As a result I try and source my "news" via independent internet sites and very rarely watch any mainstream news.

The following 8 minute link takes you to an alternative view of who may be responsible for the Boston bombings.

I'm not saying this is fact, and don't particularly agree with a lot of what Alex Jones spouts, but just thought I would open it up for discussion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axQtAFtmtVA

Mate your a mug.
Do you believe in alians as well

Mate your a mug.
Do you believe in alians as well

What that question has to do with this topic I do not know!

But for the record, yes, I am one of the 33 million UK citizens that believe in extraterrestrial life. Do you? Or are you in the minority?

Mate your a mug.
Do you believe in alians as well

What that question has to do with this topic I do not know!

But for the record, yes, I am one of the 33 million UK citizens that believe in extraterrestrial life. Do you? Or are you in the minority?

f*cking hell

If you actually bothered to watch 'mainstream news' you would realise that this is utter drivel.

BBC are doing a great job in my opinion. Your logic of trusting 'independent' sites (that any wind-up merchant can post on/create) over a trusted, global, news organisation actually made me laugh.

I'm not one for running around with a tinfoil hat on but to prove the OP' ters point on why i don't trust the mainstream media here's the link in question http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tGOt9f3gKk

Here's one with Benazir Bhutto ( the Prime Minister of Pakistan ) being interviewed live by David Frost, and she say's LIVE ON TELLY "Osama Bin Laden war murdered in 2001"! And yet nothing is said about it even on rival news channels!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fddeM2X2XeA

Then we all know what happened to her a few day's later.

watch that tool being interviewed by piers morgan on gun control on us tv and then tell me youd give any credibility to this absolute f*cking softmint

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XZvMwcluEg

watch that tool being interviewed by piers morgan on gun control on us tv and then tell me youd give any credibility to this absolute f*cking softmint

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XZvMwcluEg

The credibility lies with the video footage, which I am sure you have studied at length to form your opinion, not with Alex Jones.

As stated in the OP - "and don't particularly agree with a lot of what Alex Jones spouts".

Any non partisan person watching the live BBC broadcast of the collapse of Building 7 (which was still erect behind the reporters shoulder at time of broadcast) must ask questions surely?

How did the BBC know 22 minutes prior to the incident that that building was going to collapse?

But that is a side issue, only mentioned to explain my suspicion of mainstream media.

The real question is - Why were off duty Navy Seals in that area of Boston? And more acutely why did the official press conference state that "No Drill was in operation", when multiple witnesses stated that this is what they were told prior to the explosion?

Some good points made. Im going to throw a spanner in the works with one word - Illuminati.