MOTORING CRIME

Would like some answers from those who might know.

Man A takes his mothers car to the shop and goes into Man B car causing enough damage for an insurance claim.

Man A is not insured forcing Man B to contact his insurance provider of which he passes all the details over to them.

That's it in a nutshell, anyone know what will happen, could Man B end up in jail?

I am assuming that Man B insurance provider will contact the police over this. If so then I can see Man A at least getting a ban from driving with possible a custodial sentence as he has previous but not car related.

Over to you guys.

Cheers

He'll get done for driving with no insurance. Hope you got his real name and address and phone the police yourself.

He'll get done for driving with no insurance. Hope you got his real name and address and phone the police yourself.

I'm not involved Craig.

i'm just wondering if he will get a custody sentence?

Unless his previous is for car offences and really really bad he wont.

No custodial sentence unless hes on license or something, driving while not insured does not hold a custodial sentence as a punishment.

6 points
A £300-500 quid fine
possible ban
and court costs most likely

Would like some answers from those who might know.

Man A takes his mothers car to the shop and goes into Man B car causing enough damage for an insurance claim.

Man A is not insured forcing Man B to contact his insurance provider of which he passes all the details over to them.

That's it in a nutshell, anyone know what will happen, could Man B end up in jail?

I am assuming that Man B insurance provider will contact the police over this. If so then I can see Man A at least getting a ban from driving with possible a custodial sentence as he has previous but not car related.

Over to you guys.

Cheers

I had an idiot crashing into me then hid and wouldn't pay up even though he admitted fault at the time then changed his story and denied fault but i had witnesses. My insurance threatened to sue the driver who in the end paid..

Does Man A have witnesses?

If Man A has taken the car without permission, he technically commits an offence of taking without consent and, if he holds no valid insurance policy, driving without insurance.

If Man A has caused an accident this could be the more serious offence of Aggravated vehicle taking. This offence is imprisonable. The exact circumstances of the offence will be important to provide accurate advice however.

Tell Man A to ring me in the office Tuesday for free telephone advice if he wants.

Would like some answers from those who might know.

Man A takes his mothers car to the shop and goes into Man B car causing enough damage for an insurance claim.

Man A is not insured forcing Man B to contact his insurance provider of which he passes all the details over to them.

That's it in a nutshell, anyone know what will happen, could Man B end up in jail?

I am assuming that Man B insurance provider will contact the police over this. If so then I can see Man A at least getting a ban from driving with possible a custodial sentence as he has previous but not car related.

Over to you guys.

Cheers

How can Man B go to jail when Man A is not insured but Man B is and Man A drove into Man B's car

Would like some answers from those who might know.

Man A takes his mothers car to the shop and goes into Man B car causing enough damage for an insurance claim.

Man A is not insured forcing Man B to contact his insurance provider of which he passes all the details over to them.

That's it in a nutshell, anyone know what will happen, could Man B end up in jail?

I am assuming that Man B insurance provider will contact the police over this. If so then I can see Man A at least getting a ban from driving with possible a custodial sentence as he has previous but not car related.

Over to you guys.

Cheers

I had an idiot crashing into me then hid and wouldn't pay up even though he admitted fault at the time then changed his story and denied fault but i had witnesses. My insurance threatened to sue the driver who in the end paid..

Does Man A have witnesses?

Sorry i mean does Man B have witnesses?

Would like some answers from those who might know.

Man A takes his mothers car to the shop and goes into Man B car causing enough damage for an insurance claim.

Man A is not insured forcing Man B to contact his insurance provider of which he passes all the details over to them.

That's it in a nutshell, anyone know what will happen, could Man B end up in jail?

I am assuming that Man B insurance provider will contact the police over this. If so then I can see Man A at least getting a ban from driving with possible a custodial sentence as he has previous but not car related.

Over to you guys.

Cheers

How can Man B go to jail when Man A is not insured but Man B is and Man A drove into Man B's car

It's got conditional discharge and free African safari written all over it

Did Man C witness any of this?

Did Man C witness any of this?

No but Mel B and Mel C did.

Did Man C witness any of this?

No, they were playing Man U at the time.

Would like some answers from those who might know.

Man A takes his mothers car to the shop and goes into Man B car causing enough damage for an insurance claim.

Man A is not insured forcing Man B to contact his insurance provider of which he passes all the details over to them.

That's it in a nutshell, anyone know what will happen, could Man B end up in jail?

I am assuming that Man B insurance provider will contact the police over this. If so then I can see Man A at least getting a ban from driving with possible a custodial sentence as he has previous but not car related.

Over to you guys.

Cheers

How can Man B go to jail when Man A is not insured but Man B is and Man A drove into Man B's car

Smart arse.

I was in a rush when I posted this.

If Man A has taken the car without permission, he technically commits an offence of taking without consent and, if he holds no valid insurance policy, driving without insurance.

If Man A has caused an accident this could be the more serious offence of Aggravated vehicle taking. This offence is imprisonable. The exact circumstances of the offence will be important to provide accurate advice however.

Tell Man A to ring me in the office Tuesday for free telephone advice if he wants.

Cheers M4 but I would like to see Man A in prison.

The car belonged to Man A mother. She knew he took it, he has done many times so I'm not sure it is aggravated vehicle taking.

Would like some answers from those who might know.

Man A takes his mothers car to the shop and goes into Man B car causing enough damage for an insurance claim.

Man A is not insured forcing Man B to contact his insurance provider of which he passes all the details over to them.

That's it in a nutshell, anyone know what will happen, could Man B end up in jail?

I am assuming that Man B insurance provider will contact the police over this. If so then I can see Man A at least getting a ban from driving with possible a custodial sentence as he has previous but not car related.

Over to you guys.

Cheers

I had an idiot crashing into me then hid and wouldn't pay up even though he admitted fault at the time then changed his story and denied fault but i had witnesses. My insurance threatened to sue the driver who in the end paid..

Does Man A have witnesses?

Sorry i mean does Man B have witnesses?

They exchanged details at the incident. Man A was using his mothers car and though he was insured on her insurance. He was not.

If man A`s mother gave him permission to use the car, then Man A`s mother will get done as well as man A..
If she didn`t give permission, then man A could be charged with theft as well as no insurance..

So man A made a mistake and thought he was insured (your words) and you want to see him put inside for that?

So man A made a mistake and thought he was insured (your words) and you want to see him put inside for that?

Craig stop trying to make me out to be a c**t. Did I say that was the reason, no I did not, so stop assuming and for once think before you post.

1. Man A has a criminal record for hitting a woman some time ago.
2. Man A has another criminal record for hitting a woman while drunk.
3. Man A served a 2 year supervisory order for hitting the mother of his child after a drinking session.

Just to elaborate on the "mistake" Man A knew he was not insured and his mother knew that but she still allowed him to drive the car. This is not the only time this has happened but this weekend was the first time he has been in an incident.

Now it will be interesting to see if when the police comes around he snitches on his mother. I just wonder if he will take the blame and say to the police he took the car without his mothers consent.

So man A made a mistake and thought he was insured (your words) and you want to see him put inside for that?

Craig stop trying to make me out to be a c**t. Did I say that was the reason, no I did not, so stop assuming and for once think before you post.

1. Man A has a criminal record for hitting a woman some time ago.
2. Man A has another criminal record for hitting a woman while drunk.
3. Man A served a 2 year supervisory order for hitting the mother of his child after a drinking session.

Just to elaborate on the "mistake" Man A knew he was not insured and his mother knew that but she still allowed him to drive the car. This is not the only time this has happened but this weekend was the first time he has been in an incident.

Now it will be interesting to see if when the police comes around he snitches on his mother. I just wonder if he will take the blame and say to the police he took the car without his mothers consent.

sounds like a right c**t to me, knocking women about

So man A made a mistake and thought he was insured (your words) and you want to see him put inside for that?

Craig stop trying to make me out to be a c**t. Did I say that was the reason, no I did not, so stop assuming and for once think before you post.

1. Man A has a criminal record for hitting a woman some time ago.
2. Man A has another criminal record for hitting a woman while drunk.
3. Man A served a 2 year supervisory order for hitting the mother of his child after a drinking session.

Just to elaborate on the "mistake" Man A knew he was not insured and his mother knew that but she still allowed him to drive the car. This is not the only time this has happened but this weekend was the first time he has been in an incident.

Now it will be interesting to see if when the police comes around he snitches on his mother. I just wonder if he will take the blame and say to the police he took the car without his mothers consent.

sounds like a right c**t to me, knocking women about

He is Ben. Usually after he has had a drink.

Guys like this should be put away but it seems every time there is that chance of getting him behind bars he gets away with a menial punishment. Very frustrating.

Man a is a bellend

I i think it would have a better if man X, Y,and Z can consult with man A whilst not having to rely on man D,B,C and F being present!