Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:29 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:15 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:22 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:36 am
pembroke allan wrote:Didn't understand the equation for Watford, & hull?
If only win 2 games thats 84points! If other 2 win 5 lose 1 they
be above us? Or am I missing something?
Ahhh on current form its how you think it will end up just took another look .
Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:47 pm
StatAtak wrote:Sounds like a negative post but when you see the results it sort of gives you an idea of how well placed we are.![]()
0-2-5 finish & Brighton STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
1-0-6 finish & Forest STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
2-0-5 finish & Palace STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
2-0-5 finish & Watford STILL can't catch us even with a 6-1-1 finish.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:34 pm
StatAtak wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Didn't understand the equation for Watford, & hull?
If only win 2 games thats 84points! If other 2 win 5 lose 1 they
be above us? Or am I missing something?
Ahhh on current form its how you think it will end up just took another look .
This table is NOT based on form, it is the "worse case scenario" that would STILL get us promoted.
You are correct, if Watford win 5 & lose 1 then they will be above us which is why the table states that a 4-1-1 finish for them allows us to go up by only winning 2 games.
There is an error in my post though, the last line of my post should say Watford cannot catch us with a 4-1-1 finish and NOT a 6-1-1 finish. It was gone midnight when I posted, they haven't even got 8 games left.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:40 pm
carlccfc wrote:StatAtak wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Didn't understand the equation for Watford, & hull?
If only win 2 games thats 84points! If other 2 win 5 lose 1 they
be above us? Or am I missing something?
Ahhh on current form its how you think it will end up just took another look .
This table is NOT based on form, it is the "worse case scenario" that would STILL get us promoted.
You are correct, if Watford win 5 & lose 1 then they will be above us which is why the table states that a 4-1-1 finish for them allows us to go up by only winning 2 games.
There is an error in my post though, the last line of my post should say Watford cannot catch us with a 4-1-1 finish and NOT a 6-1-1 finish. It was gone midnight when I posted, they haven't even got 8 games left.
Fixed for you
Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:44 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:38 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:13 pm
Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:24 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Didn't understand the equation for Watford, & hull?
If only win 2 games thats 84points! If other 2 win 5 lose 1 they
be above us? Or am I missing something?
Ahhh on current form its how you think it will end up just took another look .
come on now Allen wise up!
Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:27 pm
StatAtak wrote:Sounds like a negative post but when you see the results it sort of gives you an idea of how well placed we are.![]()
0-2-5 finish & Brighton STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
1-0-6 finish & Forest STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
2-0-5 finish & Palace STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
2-0-5 finish & Watford STILL can't catch us even with a 4-1-1 finish.
Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:07 pm
StatAtak wrote:Sounds like a negative post but when you see the results it sort of gives you an idea of how well placed we are.![]()
0-2-5 finish & Brighton STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
1-0-6 finish & Forest STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
2-0-5 finish & Palace STILL can't catch us even with a 6 win, 100% finish.![]()
2-0-5 finish & Watford STILL can't catch us even with a 4-1-1 finish.
until we are there if we make it