Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:04 pm

Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:20 pm
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:22 pm
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:22 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:Not for me, we need 3 in midfield so it's the same team as Monday for me, or at worst a like for like change.
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:27 pm
BlueSince82 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Not for me, we need 3 in midfield so it's the same team as Monday for me, or at worst a like for like change.
I feel we would chop and change from Bellamy up front, to going on the wing.
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:29 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:BlueSince82 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Not for me, we need 3 in midfield so it's the same team as Monday for me, or at worst a like for like change.
I feel we would chop and change from Bellamy up front, to going on the wing.
I'm not sure if Kim or whits are best used out wide so it may be only one of the other can play in the same starting line up. Gunner as the destroyer, Mutch for the box to box and either Kim or whits to pull the trigger. Bellers wide and Conway for his defensive aspect or noone for more pace. Great to have options
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:33 pm
BlueSince82 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:BlueSince82 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Not for me, we need 3 in midfield so it's the same team as Monday for me, or at worst a like for like change.
I feel we would chop and change from Bellamy up front, to going on the wing.
I'm not sure if Kim or whits are best used out wide so it may be only one of the other can play in the same starting line up. Gunner as the destroyer, Mutch for the box to box and either Kim or whits to pull the trigger. Bellers wide and Conway for his defensive aspect or noone for more pace. Great to have options
Like you said, great to have options.![]()
I've got a feeling Mutch will score a screamer too.
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:35 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:BlueSince82 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:BlueSince82 wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Not for me, we need 3 in midfield so it's the same team as Monday for me, or at worst a like for like change.
I feel we would chop and change from Bellamy up front, to going on the wing.
I'm not sure if Kim or whits are best used out wide so it may be only one of the other can play in the same starting line up. Gunner as the destroyer, Mutch for the box to box and either Kim or whits to pull the trigger. Bellers wide and Conway for his defensive aspect or noone for more pace. Great to have options
Like you said, great to have options.![]()
I've got a feeling Mutch will score a screamer too.
Hope so as he's had a tough season and had to be patient. We haven't scored many from outside the box this season so we are due one or two
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:36 pm
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:39 pm
CCFCBlue wrote:Personally I'd go for exactly same team as yesterday but I've got a funny feeling Whitts might replace Conway.
I'd definitely stick with the 4-5-1 system, at the beginning of the season and last year I dont think we had the players to suit it but with Fraizer leading the line and with Mutchy and Kimbo supplying balls into his feet instead of hoofing it long, I think we should stick with it.![]()
![]()
I trust Malky to make the right decision and will back whatever he decides to go with.
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:47 pm
Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:48 pm
BlueSince82 wrote:CCFCBlue wrote:Personally I'd go for exactly same team as yesterday but I've got a funny feeling Whitts might replace Conway.
I'd definitely stick with the 4-5-1 system, at the beginning of the season and last year I dont think we had the players to suit it but with Fraizer leading the line and with Mutchy and Kimbo supplying balls into his feet instead of hoofing it long, I think we should stick with it.![]()
![]()
I trust Malky to make the right decision and will back whatever he decides to go with.
I also feel Malky will put Whitts in instead of Conway as he said "Whitts just needed a rest".
Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:32 pm
CCFCBlue wrote:Personally I'd go for exactly same team as yesterday but I've got a funny feeling Whitts might replace Conway.
I'd definitely stick with the 4-5-1 system, at the beginning of the season and last year I dont think we had the players to suit it but with Fraizer leading the line and with Mutchy and Kimbo supplying balls into his feet instead of hoofing it long, I think we should stick with it.![]()
![]()
I trust Malky to make the right decision and will back whatever he decides to go with.
Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:39 pm
Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:53 pm
Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:54 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:03 am
Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:37 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Definitely the same team that started Monday as this team have given our best performance for many months. How some of you can drop anyone from Monday's team is beyond me!
I've seen Taylor getting a lot of praise recently and and rightfully so, but who's usually in front of Taylor running his balls off? Conway! How anyone can suggest Whittingham or Noone playing ahead of Conway away to Watford is crazy imo. We need Conway's energy and work rate, especially away from home. He runs himself into the ground every game and is very under appreciated.
Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:06 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:11 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:58 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:01 pm
paulh_85 wrote:id play the same team.
you cant really justify bringing whitts in for kim or mutch really after thier performances monday.
more important than the selection is the formation, i feel we absolutely have to stick with the same 451 and try to boss the game from the middle of the park
Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:32 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:49 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:51 pm
BlueSince82 wrote:I'd go with this.
If we invite Watford to attack us, we're f*cked. We need to attack and look for the goal if not 2 goals.![]()
Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:59 pm
Always Blue wrote:BlueSince82 wrote:I'd go with this.
If we invite Watford to attack us, we're f*cked. We need to attack and look for the goal if not 2 goals.![]()
I think malky will play Cowie instead of Mutch imo
Wed Apr 03, 2013 5:02 pm

Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:54 pm
Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:03 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:malky will have no option but to go with this starting line up ...marshall ..connelly ..barnett ..turner ..taylor ..bellas ..gunnerson ..mutch ..kimbo ..conway ..mason... subs lewis .whitts .helguson .gestede .noone .cowie .lappin..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:04 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:malky will have no option but to go with this starting line up ...marshall ..connelly ..barnett ..turner ..taylor ..bellas ..gunnerson ..mutch ..kimbo ..conway ..mason... subs lewis .whitts .helguson .gestede .noone .cowie .lappin..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()