Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:47 pm
Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:48 pm
Fri Mar 29, 2013 11:54 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Bit pointless isn't it?
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:00 am
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:09 am
bobbyperu wrote:You could take a poll next season, of the people you're sat next to.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:28 am
harold pinta wrote:bobbyperu wrote:You could take a poll next season, of the people you're sat next to.
I already know what they think, they think that tan is a c**t. We are well aware that paying to get in appears to justify what he's done, but we are fucked if we are going to let him separate us from our team. We been supporting City for years and will be here long after tan has buggered off.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:28 am
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:38 am
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:harold pinta wrote:bobbyperu wrote:You could take a poll next season, of the people you're sat next to.
I already know what they think, they think that tan is a c**t. We are well aware that paying to get in appears to justify what he's done, but we are fucked if we are going to let him separate us from our team. We been supporting City for years and will be here long after tan has buggered off.
H'es a c**t but you will give him your money out of pride.
Tan wins.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:42 am
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:50 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:harold pinta wrote:bobbyperu wrote:You could take a poll next season, of the people you're sat next to.
I already know what they think, they think that tan is a c**t. We are well aware that paying to get in appears to justify what he's done, but we are fucked if we are going to let him separate us from our team. We been supporting City for years and will be here long after tan has buggered off.
H'es a c**t but you will give him your money out of pride.
Tan wins.
So how does one go along and support the team without putting into Tans pocket because he is who we really are against.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:51 am
bobbyperu wrote:'we' I'm not against him, best chairman since I've been watching City. 43 years
Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:00 am
harold pinta wrote:bobbyperu wrote:'we' I'm not against him, best chairman since I've been watching City. 43 years
As far as re branding goes, is there nothing that tan could do that would make you resent him?
Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:02 am
Magners wrote:harold pinta wrote:bobbyperu wrote:'we' I'm not against him, best chairman since I've been watching City. 43 years
As far as re branding goes, is there nothing that tan could do that would make you resent him?
Wow another rebrand thread.
Unfortunately not with anything interesting.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:14 am
Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:41 am