as it stands

with watford drawing (at the mo)
if we win our 3 easter games
and watford lose to hull and us (their next two games)

WE WILL be 17 point clear of them with 18 left to play for
(and a game in hand)

i tell a lie they would have played 41 games, leaving 5 so 15 points
we could be partying at watford as i mentioned before

spoke to soon.

bugger watford just gone 3-2 up so back to original points lol

bugger watford just gone 3-2 up so back to original points lol

Watford are 6 behind as it stands.

3-3!

yes if we win our 3 easter games they lose to hull and us, 5 games remaining with a 14 point gap lol

Get in there 3-3

Spoke too soon Paxman.

Eat My Goal. Twaaaaaaaaaaaat! Aha! 3-3.

Spoke too soon Paxman.

No I didnt, as it stood they were 6 behind as the post explained.

F*** it i give up till full time lol

Spoke too soon Paxman.

No I didnt, as it stood they were 6 behind as the post explained.

Oh dear

We knew what you were implying and knew where you wanted to go.

Spoke too soon Paxman.

No I didnt, as it stood they were 6 behind as the post explained.

Oh dear

We knew what you were implying and knew where you wanted to go.

I was implying that as it stood Watford were 6 points behind. Which they were. After that burnley equalised which means they are mown8 points behind.

It's kind of how it works.

Now all we need is for those dull Brummie plums to do Palarse...........

Now all we need is for those dull Brummie plums to do Palarse...........

JLC will love you.

Spoke too soon Paxman.

No I didnt, as it stood they were 6 behind as the post explained.

Oh dear

We knew what you were implying and knew where you wanted to go.

I was implying that as it stood Watford were 6 points behind. Which they were. After that burnley equalised which means they are mown8 points behind.

It's kind of how it works.

No it doesn't.

If we are going to be pedantic then I will say Watford were never 6 points behind us because points are not awarded until the final whistle is blown.

Spoke too soon Paxman.

No I didnt, as it stood they were 6 behind as the post explained.

Oh dear

We knew what you were implying and knew where you wanted to go.

I was implying that as it stood Watford were 6 points behind. Which they were. After that burnley equalised which means they are mown8 points behind.

It's kind of how it works.

No it doesn't.

If we are going to be pedantic then I will say Watford were never 6 points behind us because points are not awarded until the final whistle is blown.

That's why I added "as it stands".

You are flogging a dead horse with this one mate.

Spoke too soon Paxman.

No I didnt, as it stood they were 6 behind as the post explained.

Oh dear

We knew what you were implying and knew where you wanted to go.

I was implying that as it stood Watford were 6 points behind. Which they were. After that burnley equalised which means they are mown8 points behind.

It's kind of how it works.

No it doesn't.

If we are going to be pedantic then I will say Watford were never 6 points behind us because points are not awarded until the final whistle is blown.

That's why I added "as it stands".

You are flogging a dead horse with this one mate.

No son if you don't pack this crap in it will be you I'll be flogging as a dead horse.

No son if you don't pack this crap in it will be you I'll be flogging as a dead horse.

So proving you wrong is now deemed as crap then is it?

This thread is called "as it stands" if you don't want updates on how it stands then don't click on the "as it stands" thread. Simple.

Last edited by Paxman on Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Oh christ, Paxman/RM's off again. He's the human equivalent of a warm duvet, hot cocoa and valium all rolled into one. He asked his mother what she'd like for easter and she said "a big f*cking wooden cross to fall right on your boring fat head would be nice, you sniveling little c**t". Zzzzzz.

Oh christ, Paxman/RM's off again. He's the human equivalent of a warm duvet, hot cocoa and valium all rolled into one. He asked his mother what she'd like for easter and she said "a big f*cking wooden cross to fall right on your boring fat head would be nice, you sniveling little c**t". Zzzzzz.

Oh right?

My god he's boring. Zzzzzzzz.

He'd turn up to a party at 4am with a packet of pringles and a J20. Zzzzzz.

Baked is right. As it stood Watford weren't 6 points behind because the table isn't updated until the game is completed.

They were at the time of play 9 points behind. They are now 8 points behind at the end of the game.

You can shove your live table nonsense up your arse to be fair Paxman. If a game is stopped to be replayed at a later date live table data isn't a factor so neither should it be in any circumstance. Points are not awarded until a game is complete.

Live table data is not a formality and therefore its irrelevant. Nothing 'stands' until its written in stone.

I'm sure we all know what Paxman meant - if the game ended as it was, that would have been the result. Many people say things like that.

I'm sure we all know what Paxman meant - if the game ended as it was, that would have been the result. Many people say things like that.

if's, but's and maybe's Chuckle pal. Facts are all that matter.

I'm sure we all know what Paxman meant - if the game ended as it was, that would have been the result. Many people say things like that.

if's, but's and maybe's Chuckle pal. Facts are all that matter.

Yes, the whole point of the thread was that IF it stayed "as it stands".

I've seen many do it on here before & not have this fuss created.

I'm sure we all know what Paxman meant - if the game ended as it was, that would have been the result. Many people say things like that.

if's, but's and maybe's Chuckle pal. Facts are all that matter.

Yes, the whole point of the thread was that IF it stayed "as it stands".

I've seen many do it on here before & not have this fuss created.

Don't worry chuckles I've contacted the BBC and Sky Sports to tell them to take down their tables marked "as it stands" as that concept has now become redundant because I used it on a thread called "as it stands".. Apparently.

Baked is right. As it stood Watford weren't 6 points behind because the table isn't updated until the game is completed.

They were at the time of play 9 points behind. They are now 8 points behind at the end of the game.

You can shove your live table nonsense up your arse to be fair Paxman. If a game is stopped to be replayed at a later date live table data isn't a factor so neither should it be in any circumstance. Points are not awarded until a game is complete.

Live table data is not a formality and therefore its irrelevant. Nothing 'stands' until its written in stone.

actually the bbc live table is (sorry)
and with us now being 8 points clear, it only adds up we were 6 points clear when they were winning

anyway
8 points clear we have 3 games over easter they now have 2 (hull and us)
if we win all ours we would be on 84
having lost the above 2 they (watford) would still be on 67
a difference of 17
they (watford) would having played 39 after the 2 games only have 5 games and a possible 15 points
as i said promoted at watford