" Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:34 pm
Its not looking good for Mark Hudson, Not only was he carrying an injury to his ankle, Hudson last night injured the other one as well now. The Physio has been working on them both today and scans etc. Not looking good so could be out for quite a long time.
So where do we go from here?
Hudson will missed badly and with Turner out for a couple of games as well.
So where do we go from here?
Hudson will missed badly and with Turner out for a couple of games as well.
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:36 pm
got to dip into the loan market asap! no other option
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:38 pm
Malky will do nothing. Hudson gets injured around this point season on season, it's terrible we havent got cover.
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:38 pm
Must bring in an experienced operator. Glen Loovens?
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:43 pm
Any announcment on how long?
Also in fairness if we take even 3 points Saturday we have 2 week break.. will benefit us imo.
Also in fairness if we take even 3 points Saturday we have 2 week break.. will benefit us imo.
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:51 pm
We were desperate for defenders in the transfer market and didnt buy any.
Hopefully Hudson will be back for the play offs
Hopefully Hudson will be back for the play offs
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:52 pm
We forever f*cking lose without him so that's us fucked , hope I'm wrong
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:58 pm
Need to get someone in ASAP, everyone knew we were thin at the back it should have been sorted months ago
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:59 pm
LutonBluebird wrote:We forever f*cking lose without him so that's us fucked , hope I'm wrong
Heads up lads, it's not the end of the world yet
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:29 pm
Roger Johnson, put his body on the line against us the other week. Anyone?
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:30 pm
so rumours are true that Hudson is out for the season and Turner for three weeks?
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:38 pm
BlueView wrote:Roger Johnson, put his body on the line against us the other week. Anyone?
No, He's shit and was aweful against us.
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:00 pm
Kanester wrote:BlueView wrote:Roger Johnson, put his body on the line against us the other week. Anyone?
No, He's shit and was aweful against us.
He was
plus teams are certainly not going to let their best players go,Like mentioned the defence should have been sorted ages ago
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:41 pm
captbirdseye wrote:so rumours are true that Hudson is out for the season and Turner for three weeks?
No
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:56 am
BlueView wrote:Roger Johnson, put his body on the line against us the other week. Anyone?
I think he would jump at the chance to get back here,but for me hes not the same player who left us.
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:34 am
Brum need to offload senior players...
Curtis Davies?
Curtis Davies?
Re: " Not looking good for Mark Hudson, So Where "
Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:36 am
RobbieS wrote:Must bring in an experienced operator. Glen Loovens?
Glen loovens? no thanks