Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:48 am
Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:59 am
sloper_road_legend wrote:from 1948 even*
His new avatar looks like the first one only aged.
but he cant be real, to much energy in his posts for an OAP
Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:18 am
Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:29 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:40 am
Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:23 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:13 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:32 pm
Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:43 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
It could be either of the cretins.
Expect to hear from my lawyer folks.
Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:10 pm
Nanny McPhail wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
Had a run in with his two alter egos Saturday night. Paxman and this bluebirdsince1946. So easy to work him out.
Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:19 pm
Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:25 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:This thread is daft of course hes real i've had a jar or two with the old stylish chap, hes not a chino wearing student type living off goverment loans like them parasites thats for sure although i know he has a atleast twenty plus notches cut in to the side of his fine oak walking stick which he said are marks of war where he beats student types who thought they could take one of the old guard on, how foolish was they, now everyone show some f*cking respect for one of the old guard
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:01 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
Had a run in with his two alter egos Saturday night. Paxman and this bluebirdsince1946. So easy to work him out.
I highly recommend everyone reads that thread
Flogging a dead horse by a madman is the term that springs to mind, poor blazing saddles
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:08 pm
Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
Had a run in with his two alter egos Saturday night. Paxman and this bluebirdsince1946. So easy to work him out.
I highly recommend everyone reads that thread
Flogging a dead horse by a madman is the term that springs to mind, poor blazing saddles
Roath shut up you daft jack c**t. Everyone knows its you. You're getting boring.
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:13 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
Had a run in with his two alter egos Saturday night. Paxman and this bluebirdsince1946. So easy to work him out.
I highly recommend everyone reads that thread
Flogging a dead horse by a madman is the term that springs to mind, poor blazing saddles
Roath shut up you daft jack c**t. Everyone knows its you. You're getting boring.
Stop getting angry blazing. We had that discussion on the last thread, as soon as you lose your temper and start name calling, you have lost the argument, not that you ever had one of course
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:17 pm
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:18 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Barnett
Nah, ive now read some pro swansea tripe.
Its not Barnett. Its Roathie.
Had a run in with his two alter egos Saturday night. Paxman and this bluebirdsince1946. So easy to work him out.
I highly recommend everyone reads that thread
Flogging a dead horse by a madman is the term that springs to mind, poor blazing saddles
Roath shut up you daft jack c**t. Everyone knows its you. You're getting boring.
Stop getting angry blazing. We had that discussion on the last thread, as soon as you lose your temper and start name calling, you have lost the argument, not that you ever had one of course
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:20 pm
Nanny McPhail wrote:And that little phrase you like to use that you take from Annis about name calling losing arguments, well I seem him call someone a "little b*stard" so I think you may need to rethink using that whopper.
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:30 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:And that little phrase you like to use that you take from Annis about name calling losing arguments, well I seem him call someone a "little b*stard" so I think you may need to rethink using that whopper.
Well then he lost the argument didnt he, his board his rules.
Judging by the poll you are wrong anyway without the losing of temper and your tantrums
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:52 pm
Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:And that little phrase you like to use that you take from Annis about name calling losing arguments, well I seem him call someone a "little b*stard" so I think you may need to rethink using that whopper.
Well then he lost the argument didnt he, his board his rules.
Judging by the poll you are wrong anyway without the losing of temper and your tantrums
Your mask will soon slip Roath my old bean. Always does. Then you'll come back with another shit alter ego and get found out once again.
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:56 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:And that little phrase you like to use that you take from Annis about name calling losing arguments, well I seem him call someone a "little b*stard" so I think you may need to rethink using that whopper.
Well then he lost the argument didnt he, his board his rules.
Judging by the poll you are wrong anyway without the losing of temper and your tantrums
Your mask will soon slip Roath my old bean. Always does. Then you'll come back with another shit alter ego and get found out once again.
You are quite the conspiracy theorist
You don't have a Tim foil hat by any chance do you
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:57 pm
Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:And that little phrase you like to use that you take from Annis about name calling losing arguments, well I seem him call someone a "little b*stard" so I think you may need to rethink using that whopper.
Well then he lost the argument didnt he, his board his rules.
Judging by the poll you are wrong anyway without the losing of temper and your tantrums
Your mask will soon slip Roath my old bean. Always does. Then you'll come back with another shit alter ego and get found out once again.
You are quite the conspiracy theorist
You don't have a Tim foil hat by any chance do you
A Tim foil bat?
Mon Mar 11, 2013 8:59 pm
BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:BluebirdSince1946 wrote:Nanny McPhail wrote:And that little phrase you like to use that you take from Annis about name calling losing arguments, well I seem him call someone a "little b*stard" so I think you may need to rethink using that whopper.
Well then he lost the argument didnt he, his board his rules.
Judging by the poll you are wrong anyway without the losing of temper and your tantrums
Your mask will soon slip Roath my old bean. Always does. Then you'll come back with another shit alter ego and get found out once again.
You are quite the conspiracy theorist
You don't have a Tim foil hat by any chance do you
A Tim foil bat?
A bat?
Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:00 pm