Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:02 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:11 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:16 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:25 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:27 pm
xajax wrote:Their loss includes a one off purchase of the stadium for £17 million. If you remove that, its a million quid a month they are loosing, which is the same VT says he's putting into you lot. In fact they have a thousand a game less, through the gates, than you do, so their running costs must be very close to yours.
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:43 pm
SeanJr wrote:xajax wrote:Their loss includes a one off purchase of the stadium for £17 million. If you remove that, its a million quid a month they are loosing, which is the same VT says he's putting into you lot. In fact they have a thousand a game less, through the gates, than you do, so their running costs must be very close to yours.
The stadium purchase isn't included the 2012 figures.
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:52 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:59 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:59 pm
Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:16 pm
The Sheriff wrote:To be honest who thought Portsmouth were spending poorly when they won the fa cup. Leicester have a decent average attendance, unlike Watford. The benefits of getting in the premiership this year are bigger than ever. The foreign owners know that.
Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:12 am
xajax wrote:Their loss includes a one off purchase of the stadium for £17 million. If you remove that, its a million quid a month they are loosing, which is the same VT says he's putting into you lot. In fact they have a thousand a game less, through the gates, than you do, so their running costs must be very close to yours.
Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:33 am