Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:23 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:24 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:27 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:33 pm
RFMH wrote:Almost looks like they created negative press, to create positive press, to ease pressure on the team.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:33 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:42 pm
Angry Man wrote:for acting so quickly on this with their statement. Whether or not you believe it is another matter but you can't fault the speed of the reaction from the club on this.
Well done
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:46 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:55 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:f**k me brownie thats a 1st positive from you in 2yearswhats the crack
![]()
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:57 pm
Angry Man wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:f**k me brownie thats a 1st positive from you in 2yearswhats the crack
![]()
2 years..? More like 4 days!!!!! viewtopic.php?f=2&t=106018
Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:58 pm
Angry Man wrote:for acting so quickly on this with their statement. Whether or not you believe it is another matter but you can't fault the speed of the reaction from the club on this.
Well done
Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:05 pm
Angry Man wrote:for acting so quickly on this with their statement. Whether or not you believe it is another matter but you can't fault the speed of the reaction from the club on this.
Well done
Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:07 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Angry Man wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:f**k me brownie thats a 1st positive from you in 2yearswhats the crack
![]()
2 years..? More like 4 days!!!!! viewtopic.php?f=2&t=106018
Been to rehab have you![]()
Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:09 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:11 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:12 pm
Angry Man wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Angry Man wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:f**k me brownie thats a 1st positive from you in 2yearswhats the crack
![]()
2 years..? More like 4 days!!!!! viewtopic.php?f=2&t=106018
Been to rehab have you![]()
credit where credits due. Do you want me to get out more positive posts or do you prefer to continue with this myth that I only post negative stuff..?
Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:58 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:03 pm
glas wrote:Looks a typical political tactic to me.
Lets leak the information (name change), see the reaction, and if it is bad we will deny it was ever discussed - blame some stirrers etc. If the reaction is 50/50 or positive then go ahead with it.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:20 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:34 pm
Old school BLUE wrote:Brownie what the fook as it got to do with you , you don't even support cardiff city fook off on your pathetic politics forum and post bullshit to your 5 members![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:18 pm
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:21 pm
Angry Man wrote:RFMH wrote:Almost looks like they created negative press, to create positive press, to ease pressure on the team.
Personally I think they just wanted to see the reaction first
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:25 pm
RFMH wrote:Almost looks like they created negative press, to create positive press, to ease pressure on the team.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:27 pm
Angry Man wrote:glas wrote:Looks a typical political tactic to me.
Lets leak the information (name change), see the reaction, and if it is bad we will deny it was ever discussed - blame some stirrers etc. If the reaction is 50/50 or positive then go ahead with it.
That is exactly what I think has happened.
Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:41 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Angry Man wrote:glas wrote:Looks a typical political tactic to me.
Lets leak the information (name change), see the reaction, and if it is bad we will deny it was ever discussed - blame some stirrers etc. If the reaction is 50/50 or positive then go ahead with it.
That is exactly what I think has happened.
The club didn't leak any information, the BBC did to stimulate interest and it worked, yeh something to beat VT and the club up with.