Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:50 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:33 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:33 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:46 am
Xcasual wrote:Not a chance
Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:48 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:48 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Xcasual wrote:Not a chance
closet gay still.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:11 am
RFMH wrote:Yes
Why anyone would want to keep rights for themselves but stand in the way of others is beyond belief.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:19 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:28 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:39 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Gay Marriage - Yes or no poll.
Should it be allowed for the same sex to do this in this country. I know many years ago it would be looked down upon but times have changed since then we have gone from closet gay people to the guy down the street wearing makeup and talking/acting like a women.
I voted no for men as its not rite IMO, women on the other hand are allowed to but only if there NOT 18stone, short haired chunky chics with love & hate tattooed on each knuckle and bingo wings to suit
Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:44 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:49 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:36 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:10 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:37 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:37 am
BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:41 am
NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:42 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:43 am
BanterLad115 wrote:This isn't about love, I'm sure jimmy saville love his kids but it still wasn't right for him to screw them in the ass. For me the simple fact is that gay people can't procreate by having sex and so I consider it unnatural whether you look at it from evolution or religion its still wrong, end of story
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:47 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:48 am
NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:50 am
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:53 am
RFMH wrote:NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
Well ignore that you made a comment that natural is not a good measurement for right. Because you'll lose (badly) unless you don't own a microwave, don't fly in planes and don't use the Internet.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ ... l_behavior
1500 species. Yet only humans exhibit homophobic behaviour. So which is the unnatural one?
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:56 am
Zabier wrote:NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
It's not natural? Doggy style isn't necessarily natural going on that basis... if doggy style is natural though then doesn't that mean homosexuality is natural because the male g-spot is the prostate gland.
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:56 am
NIBluebird wrote:RFMH wrote:NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
Well ignore that you made a comment that natural is not a good measurement for right. Because you'll lose (badly) unless you don't own a microwave, don't fly in planes and don't use the Internet.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ ... l_behavior
1500 species. Yet only humans exhibit homophobic behaviour. So which is the unnatural one?
UK calls itself still a Christian society yet looks at homosexuality as ok as they love eachother as well ...........suppose murder is ok as long as you hate somebody enough ?
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:58 am
NIBluebird wrote:Zabier wrote:NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
It's not natural? Doggy style isn't necessarily natural going on that basis... if doggy style is natural though then doesn't that mean homosexuality is natural because the male g-spot is the prostate gland.
Its not the sexual position its the male and male concept
Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:59 am
Zabier wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:This isn't about love, I'm sure jimmy saville love his kids but it still wasn't right for him to screw them in the ass. For me the simple fact is that gay people can't procreate by having sex and so I consider it unnatural whether you look at it from evolution or religion its still wrong, end of story
So by saying that do you think that infertile men and women should be refused the right to get married?
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:00 pm
Zabier wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:This isn't about love, I'm sure jimmy saville love his kids but it still wasn't right for him to screw them in the ass. For me the simple fact is that gay people can't procreate by having sex and so I consider it unnatural whether you look at it from evolution or religion its still wrong, end of story
So by saying that do you think that infertile men and women should be refused the right to get married?
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:00 pm
BanterLad115 wrote:Zabier wrote:BanterLad115 wrote:This isn't about love, I'm sure jimmy saville love his kids but it still wasn't right for him to screw them in the ass. For me the simple fact is that gay people can't procreate by having sex and so I consider it unnatural whether you look at it from evolution or religion its still wrong, end of story
So by saying that do you think that infertile men and women should be refused the right to get married?
No because that's a defect, not a choice, you're trying to compare disabled people with gay people
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:00 pm
Zabier wrote:NIBluebird wrote:Zabier wrote:NIBluebird wrote:BIG_BAD_WOLF wrote:100% yes.
Why on earth should two people who are in love not have the right to get married? It's ludicrous.
Its not natural for a start - woman was created for man - simple
It's not natural? Doggy style isn't necessarily natural going on that basis... if doggy style is natural though then doesn't that mean homosexuality is natural because the male g-spot is the prostate gland.
Its not the sexual position its the male and male concept
Are your views influenced by religion or are they non-religious views? Just interest to know where your thinking is coming from. You use the term "created" which suggests you might be religious which would be pointless continuing this debate because then we would get into the chicken vs the egg argument!