Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:05 pm
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:08 pm
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:21 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:He would not be a Maynard replacement. He's a CAM/CF, not a striker. Plays just behind the striker or out left as an attacking midfielder. He did well there for Norwich so would hope there is some truth in this.
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:24 pm
Grange_Bluebird wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:He would not be a Maynard replacement. He's a CAM/CF, not a striker. Plays just behind the striker or out left as an attacking midfielder. He did well there for Norwich so would hope there is some truth in this.
With our midfield i cant see Malky playing him anywhere but up front. I can see him playing when bellers isn't fit, otherwise he'll just sit on the bench. Would be a great squad player though!
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:45 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:Grange_Bluebird wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:He would not be a Maynard replacement. He's a CAM/CF, not a striker. Plays just behind the striker or out left as an attacking midfielder. He did well there for Norwich so would hope there is some truth in this.
With our midfield i cant see Malky playing him anywhere but up front. I can see him playing when bellers isn't fit, otherwise he'll just sit on the bench. Would be a great squad player though!
4-4-1-1 possibly? Playing off Helguson or Gestede?
Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:09 pm
Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:33 am
Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:41 am
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:Wasn't Pacheco supposed to be a wonder kid or something?
Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:43 am
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:Wasn't Pacheco supposed to be a wonder kid or something?