Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:21 am

Anything else you need? Proof is highlighted in red.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:24 am

All Black Everything. wrote:Anything else you need? Proof is highlighted in red.


That proves gwyn was telling the truth, he says in that quote that it wasn't about the debt to equity, t was about over issues.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:25 am

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
All Black Everything. wrote:Anything else you need? Proof is highlighted in red.


That proves gwyn was telling the truth, he says in that quote that it wasn't about the debt to equity, t was about over issues.


Hence 'here's the proof Gwyn'. I knew he was telling the truth about the 6 months thing because I was part of that convo.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:25 am

Ummmm barnet, that's the one from earlier that pretty much exonerates gwyn!

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:27 am

Damned Yank wrote:Ummmm barnet, that's the one from earlier that pretty much exonerates gwyn!


If you check the other thread I have said Gwyn was telling the truth. This is the proof to back up Gwyn's argument.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:28 am

All Black Everything. wrote:
Damned Yank wrote:Ummmm barnet, that's the one from earlier that pretty much exonerates gwyn!


If you check the other thread I have said Gwyn was telling the truth. This is the proof to back up Gwyn's argument.


Yeah fair enough, we posted at exactly the same time

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:32 am

Glad that's sorted, needless to say Adam will be forthcoming with an apology :roll:

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:33 am

Gavlar wrote:Glad that's sorted, needless to say Adam will be forthcoming with an apology :roll:


You didn't need to apolagize to Adam in the other thread.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:35 am

Ahh I was just entertaining Daya, I didn't want my point to be lost because I said that, wanted to discuss the actual point I made not the preamble

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:38 am

Gavlar wrote:Ahh I was just entertaining Daya, I didn't want my point to be lost because I said that, wanted to discuss the actual point I made not the preamble


Ah right good, wouldn't want those two having some leverage on this site. :lol:

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:46 am

Interesting :D

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:49 am

I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:51 am

CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that

Not really there's only two people arguing.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:53 am

kingdong wrote:
CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that

Not really there's only two people arguing.

A lot more than that, loads of people have gotten into arguments over it, not just on here either. It's almost impossible to have a debate on the rebrand without things turning sour and the personal insults coming out

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:54 am

CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that


So this messageboard reflects the entire fanbase?

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:56 am

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that


So this messageboard reflects the entire fanbase?

Like I just said in another post, not just on this board, I've seen it happen in other places. College, and even in a house party in October. You can't deny there's been a split because of it all

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:57 am

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that


So this messageboard reflects the entire fanbase?


Yet another problem we have. Most fans want us red. They are casual fans and care more about how the kit looks on them in a fashion sense than the colours of the club traditionally. Thats modern football and the modern fan and people need to accept it. The majority of fans aren't like the hardcore forum members who follow the club religiously, we are a minority. A minority that will show up if we go into admin and end up back in League Two.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:01 am

CantonJack wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that


So this messageboard reflects the entire fanbase?

Like I just said in another post, not just on this board, I've seen it happen in other places. College, and even in a house party in October. You can't deny there's been a split because of it all


My apolagies, I must've posted at the same time as you, I honestly don't think it has. Some people are pissed and refuse to accept it, alot of us are pissed off with it (rebrand) but reluctantly accepted it. That's how I feel anyway.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:11 am

All Black Everything. wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that


So this messageboard reflects the entire fanbase?


Yet another problem we have. Most fans want us red. They are casual fans and care more about how the kit looks on them in a fashion sense than the colours of the club traditionally. Thats modern football and the modern fan and people need to accept it. The majority of fans aren't like the hardcore forum members who follow the club religiously, we are a minority. A minority that will show up if we go into admin and end up back in League Two.

That's bullshit nobody wants us red. Everybody wants us blue some people just don't care as much as other people.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 2:16 am

kingdong wrote:
All Black Everything. wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
CantonJack wrote:I'm sure a few people on here said the divide in the supporters due to the rebrand wasn't that big. Look at it, grown men, once friends having a go at eachother over a messageboard.


This fanbase of this club is well and truly fucked, winning a title won't fix that


So this messageboard reflects the entire fanbase?


Yet another problem we have. Most fans want us red. They are casual fans and care more about how the kit looks on them in a fashion sense than the colours of the club traditionally. Thats modern football and the modern fan and people need to accept it. The majority of fans aren't like the hardcore forum members who follow the club religiously, we are a minority. A minority that will show up if we go into admin and end up back in League Two.

That's bullshit nobody wants us red. Everybody wants us blue some people just don't care as much as other people.


Trust you to think that. I have spoken to plenty of people who don't want us to go back to blue and the red shirt is the first one they've bought in years.

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:22 am

So gwyn did say he would be the 1st over the fence if VT has shafted us, but as of yet we have not been shafted (bar the red rebrand) adam you made out gwyn was going to be the 1st over the fence if the debt to equity wasnt done within six months in other threads yet i dont see gwyn saying this in any of his quote, f**k me you tell some porkies :lol:
:ayatollah:

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:15 am

bluebird1977 wrote:So gwyn did say he would be the 1st over the fence if VT has shafted us, but as of yet we have not been shafted (bar the red rebrand) adam you made out gwyn was going to be the 1st over the fence if the debt to equity wasnt done within six months in other threads yet i dont see gwyn saying this in any of his quote, f**k me you tell some porkies :lol:
:ayatollah:


Ian he was still online when this was posted, he promptly logged off, no doubt cursing at his foiled plan!

He would of gotten away with it if it wasn't for these pesky kids......

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:17 am

Gavlar wrote:
bluebird1977 wrote:So gwyn did say he would be the 1st over the fence if VT has shafted us, but as of yet we have not been shafted (bar the red rebrand) adam you made out gwyn was going to be the 1st over the fence if the debt to equity wasnt done within six months in other threads yet i dont see gwyn saying this in any of his quote, f**k me you tell some porkies :lol:
:ayatollah:


Ian he was still online when this was posted, he promptly logged off, no doubt cursing at his foiled plan!

He would of gotten away with it if it wasn't for these pesky kids......

The mans crackers gav :lol:

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:02 am

This exchange was from recently but if you go on the saga thread someone has posted Gwyns stance from July, in writing and Angry Adam dissapeared :lol:

Re: Here's the proof Gwyn

Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:50 am

Mario Polotelli wrote:This exchange was from recently but if you go on the saga thread someone has posted Gwyns stance from July, in writing and Angry Adam dissapeared :lol:


It gets worse for Adam :oops: :lol: