Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:48 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares
So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.
Case dismissed
So which one is it?
They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.
Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.
Cheers
And with his tail between his legsRM starts from the beginning. I'll break it down, here goes:
Nobody (sane) supports you.
Why?
Because nobody cares what you think.
So not caring is the driver for not supporting you. Not vice versa or any other way to try and twist it to squirm out of being shown up. Enjoyed it though
He says start from the beginning yet says a statement that was never said![]()
If you had said that from the start it would have been a lot less time wasted, although you have clearly changed it.
I couldn't care less if anyone supports me, I don't need support to send an email.
As for nobody caring, we dismissed that on page one.
Cheers.
I'm afraid that breaks down to what I said. You're the one you changed it, slipping in a cheeky "so" to try and deflect from looking like an arse. News is fella, you failed
Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:49 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares
So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.
Case dismissed
So which one is it?
They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.
Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.
Cheers
And with his tail between his legsRM starts from the beginning. I'll break it down, here goes:
Nobody (sane) supports you.
Why?
Because nobody cares what you think.
So not caring is the driver for not supporting you. Not vice versa or any other way to try and twist it to squirm out of being shown up. Enjoyed it though
He says start from the beginning yet says a statement that was never said![]()
If you had said that from the start it would have been a lot less time wasted, although you have clearly changed it.
I couldn't care less if anyone supports me, I don't need support to send an email.
As for nobody caring, we dismissed that on page one.
Cheers.
I'm afraid that breaks down to what I said. You're the one you changed it, slipping in a cheeky "so" to try and deflect from looking like an arse. News is fella, you failed
he will never fail as sits in front of pc with dictionary, and chinese book of quotes! and mars bars so can keep going 24/7
Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:52 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:56 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:57 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Loving this. The quote is:
None of which support you so like I said nobody cares
So they don't support you as they don't care. Understand? Your use of "so" in "none of them support me so they don't care" changes the whole context and not what I wrote.
Case dismissed
So which one is it?
They don't care... Which is dismissed by the fact people are clearly interested due to page views, posts and questions asked.
Or they don't support me... Which is a completely different issue.
Cheers
And with his tail between his legsRM starts from the beginning. I'll break it down, here goes:
Nobody (sane) supports you.
Why?
Because nobody cares what you think.
So not caring is the driver for not supporting you. Not vice versa or any other way to try and twist it to squirm out of being shown up. Enjoyed it though
He says start from the beginning yet says a statement that was never said![]()
If you had said that from the start it would have been a lot less time wasted, although you have clearly changed it.
I couldn't care less if anyone supports me, I don't need support to send an email.
As for nobody caring, we dismissed that on page one.
Cheers.
I'm afraid that breaks down to what I said. You're the one you changed it, slipping in a cheeky "so" to try and deflect from looking like an arse. News is fella, you failed
I see so when you initially said nobody cared, you mean nobody supported me![]()
Both are either wrong or inconsequential..... Awesome
Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:59 pm
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:00 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Where did I make out it wasn't a good rate? It's an excellent rate.... For him.
I'm sure he does get more than 8% in some of his other businesses, the main principle investment in Cardiff wasn't to provide loan notes. If it was he absolutely would have invested in something else.
Surely even an idiot can see that?
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:01 pm
RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:03 pm
RoathMagic wrote:No. Most don't support me... Which is inconsequential.... But many care.
So again either way you are wrong.
Cheers
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:06 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Where did I make out it wasn't a good rate? It's an excellent rate.... For him.
I'm sure he does get more than 8% in some of his other businesses, the main principle investment in Cardiff wasn't to provide loan notes. If it was he absolutely would have invested in something else.
Surely even an idiot can see that?
Dont know can you? The point is its a good rate for the Club, if we have to have debt of course. The rate isn't good for VT as he can get a better return elsewhere. You just admitted that so how is it a good rate for VT?
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:07 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Where did I make out it wasn't a good rate? It's an excellent rate.... For him.
I'm sure he does get more than 8% in some of his other businesses, the main principle investment in Cardiff wasn't to provide loan notes. If it was he absolutely would have invested in something else.
Surely even an idiot can see that?
Dont know can you? The point is its a good rate for the Club, if we have to have debt of course. The rate isn't good for VT as he can get a better return elsewhere. You just admitted that so how is it a good rate for VT?
Hmm you really aren't very bright. It's not a good rate for the club, we don't have to have debt.
The rate is good for vt as the loan notes are in his interests PLUS he gets 7%? Not to mention 7 % of £40.8 million is more than 8% of around 420K.
There have been companies with 1000% yearly yield. It's like saying why doesn't tan get that then
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:08 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:No. Most don't support me... Which is inconsequential.... But many care.
So again either way you are wrong.
Cheers
See this is your delusional trait. Nobody cares and you're a farce, a laughing stock. Pitied. See I'm right aren't I?
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:08 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Where did I make out it wasn't a good rate? It's an excellent rate.... For him.
I'm sure he does get more than 8% in some of his other businesses, the main principle investment in Cardiff wasn't to provide loan notes. If it was he absolutely would have invested in something else.
Surely even an idiot can see that?
Dont know can you? The point is its a good rate for the Club, if we have to have debt of course. The rate isn't good for VT as he can get a better return elsewhere. You just admitted that so how is it a good rate for VT?
Hmm you really aren't very bright. It's not a good rate for the club, we don't have to have debt.
The rate is good for vt as the loan notes are in his interests PLUS he gets 7%? Not to mention 7 % of £40.8 million is more than 8% of around 420K.
There have been companies with 1000% yearly yield. It's like saying why doesn't tan get that then
Why would VT not put 7% interest on his loan notes when Sam did the same thing
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:10 pm
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:11 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Where did I make out it wasn't a good rate? It's an excellent rate.... For him.
I'm sure he does get more than 8% in some of his other businesses, the main principle investment in Cardiff wasn't to provide loan notes. If it was he absolutely would have invested in something else.
Surely even an idiot can see that?
Dont know can you? The point is its a good rate for the Club, if we have to have debt of course. The rate isn't good for VT as he can get a better return elsewhere. You just admitted that so how is it a good rate for VT?
Hmm you really aren't very bright. It's not a good rate for the club, we don't have to have debt.
The rate is good for vt as the loan notes are in his interests PLUS he gets 7%? Not to mention 7 % of £40.8 million is more than 8% of around 420K.
There have been companies with 1000% yearly yield. It's like saying why doesn't tan get that then
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:12 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Essoblue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
whilst telling the world you live at 5 Balaclava in Roath?
Hope you were telling porkies.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which i suspect you were
Why would I lie? I also own 22 and 23 prospect place down the bay![]()
Go nuts
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:13 pm
citygardens73 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Essoblue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
whilst telling the world you live at 5 Balaclava in Roath?
Hope you were telling porkies.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which i suspect you were
Why would I lie? I also own 22 and 23 prospect place down the bay![]()
Go nuts
Thats funny cos i live in prospect place & guess which number i live........yep number 22 & you dont own my apartment , so tell me again which apartments do you own , if your gonna lie make it believeable, my guess is hes a dirty jack
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:14 pm
citygardens73 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Essoblue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
whilst telling the world you live at 5 Balaclava in Roath?
Hope you were telling porkies.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which i suspect you were
Why would I lie? I also own 22 and 23 prospect place down the bay![]()
Go nuts
Thats funny cos i live in prospect place & guess which number i live........yep number 22 & you dont own my apartment , so tell me again which apartments do you own , if your gonna lie make it believeable, my guess is hes a dirty jack
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:14 pm
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:15 pm
antonynash wrote:the worrying thing is that people (including myself) actually take an interest in this bullshit, the even more worrying thing is people walk away from their laptops/pc's and mobile phones seriously wound up by each other.
Is this a forum to discuss Cardiff City football Club or a forum to prove how intelligent you can portray yourself on an internet forum...
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:15 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
You are sounding a little silly now.
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Where did I make out it wasn't a good rate? It's an excellent rate.... For him.
I'm sure he does get more than 8% in some of his other businesses, the main principle investment in Cardiff wasn't to provide loan notes. If it was he absolutely would have invested in something else.
Surely even an idiot can see that?
Dont know can you? The point is its a good rate for the Club, if we have to have debt of course. The rate isn't good for VT as he can get a better return elsewhere. You just admitted that so how is it a good rate for VT?
Hmm you really aren't very bright. It's not a good rate for the club, we don't have to have debt.
The rate is good for vt as the loan notes are in his interests PLUS he gets 7%? Not to mention 7 % of £40.8 million is more than 8% of around 420K.
There have been companies with 1000% yearly yield. It's like saying why doesn't tan get that then
It's why I said if we have to have debt of course. You don't read anything and you accuse people of not being bright?![]()
And since VT is a property developer amongst other interests it was relevant to your (made up) 8%.
Fool. Pitiful fool.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:17 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:citygardens73 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Essoblue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
whilst telling the world you live at 5 Balaclava in Roath?
Hope you were telling porkies.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which i suspect you were
Why would I lie? I also own 22 and 23 prospect place down the bay![]()
Go nuts
Thats funny cos i live in prospect place & guess which number i live........yep number 22 & you dont own my apartment , so tell me again which apartments do you own , if your gonna lie make it believeable, my guess is hes a dirty jack
Oops somebody stretched their fantasy world a little too far
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:17 pm
RoathMagic wrote:citygardens73 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Essoblue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
whilst telling the world you live at 5 Balaclava in Roath?
Hope you were telling porkies.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which i suspect you were
Why would I lie? I also own 22 and 23 prospect place down the bay![]()
Go nuts
Thats funny cos i live in prospect place & guess which number i live........yep number 22 & you dont own my apartment , so tell me again which apartments do you own , if your gonna lie make it believeable, my guess is hes a dirty jack
Currently, nobody lives in number 22.
Cheers.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:17 pm
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:18 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Again I have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you suggesting all businesses have the same rate of profit?
Didn't say that. Merely pointing out that 7% is a good rate, yet you love to quote it as if it's not. The point here is VT could clearly make more return than 7% should he wish, as if a fool like you can make 8% then it's guaranteed. So he's going to get his return from success on and off the pitch
Where did I make out it wasn't a good rate? It's an excellent rate.... For him.
I'm sure he does get more than 8% in some of his other businesses, the main principle investment in Cardiff wasn't to provide loan notes. If it was he absolutely would have invested in something else.
Surely even an idiot can see that?
Dont know can you? The point is its a good rate for the Club, if we have to have debt of course. The rate isn't good for VT as he can get a better return elsewhere. You just admitted that so how is it a good rate for VT?
Hmm you really aren't very bright. It's not a good rate for the club, we don't have to have debt.
The rate is good for vt as the loan notes are in his interests PLUS he gets 7%? Not to mention 7 % of £40.8 million is more than 8% of around 420K.
There have been companies with 1000% yearly yield. It's like saying why doesn't tan get that then
It's why I said if we have to have debt of course. You don't read anything and you accuse people of not being bright?![]()
And since VT is a property developer amongst other interests it was relevant to your (made up) 8%.
Fool. Pitiful fool.
Another senseless post. % interest charged to a loan to support you own company isnt related in anyway to the yearly rental yields on a property.
Cheers.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:18 pm
citygardens73 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:citygardens73 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Essoblue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
whilst telling the world you live at 5 Balaclava in Roath?
Hope you were telling porkies.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which i suspect you were
Why would I lie? I also own 22 and 23 prospect place down the bay![]()
Go nuts
Thats funny cos i live in prospect place & guess which number i live........yep number 22 & you dont own my apartment , so tell me again which apartments do you own , if your gonna lie make it believeable, my guess is hes a dirty jack
Currently, nobody lives in number 22.
Cheers.
I do... you wanna drive down from Swansea & have a look
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:20 pm
RoathMagic wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:citygardens73 wrote:RoathMagic wrote:Essoblue wrote:RoathMagic wrote:With comments and threads made by gwyn most notably as well as others regarding waiting until he pumps his money in and then planning to protest.
I've taken a leaf out of ihatealiens' book.
I'll inform you of the reply.
whilst telling the world you live at 5 Balaclava in Roath?
Hope you were telling porkies.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
which i suspect you were
Why would I lie? I also own 22 and 23 prospect place down the bay![]()
Go nuts
Thats funny cos i live in prospect place & guess which number i live........yep number 22 & you dont own my apartment , so tell me again which apartments do you own , if your gonna lie make it believeable, my guess is hes a dirty jack
Oops somebody stretched their fantasy world a little too far
Yeah way too far. I live in your house too, which means your homeless.
Or do you think it's easy to make that up![]()
Nice one.
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:21 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:
Does VT own the club then? Be careful......
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:21 pm
ninianblue wrote:you know when you get a picture of somebody in your head. mine is roath jack is 35-48. living with his mum at home. and his mum taps on the floorboards, cup of tea jack.bang , bang, make me a sandwich, jack
Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:21 pm
RoathMagic wrote:No. Most don't support me... Which is inconsequential.... But many care.
So again either way you are wrong.
Cheers