Thu May 31, 2012 9:50 pm
2blue2handle wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CF14-SE14 wrote:Agreed, I'd be happy to shake the leakers hand, he did us a service.
One of the things that made me the most angry was the way it had been planned in secret for a year and that we were being told to like it or lump it with no consultation, hence why it had to be leaked.
snap
Really? If it was like it or lump it why have they changed?
Thu May 31, 2012 9:51 pm
Thu May 31, 2012 9:52 pm
2blue2handle wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CF14-SE14 wrote:Agreed, I'd be happy to shake the leakers hand, he did us a service.
One of the things that made me the most angry was the way it had been planned in secret for a year and that we were being told to like it or lump it with no consultation, hence why it had to be leaked.
snap
Really? If it was like it or lump it why have they changed?
Thu May 31, 2012 9:52 pm
2blue2handle wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CF14-SE14 wrote:Agreed, I'd be happy to shake the leakers hand, he did us a service.
One of the things that made me the most angry was the way it had been planned in secret for a year and that we were being told to like it or lump it with no consultation, hence why it had to be leaked.
snap
Really? If it was like it or lump it why have they changed?
Thu May 31, 2012 9:53 pm
2blue2handle wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CF14-SE14 wrote:Agreed, I'd be happy to shake the leakers hand, he did us a service.
One of the things that made me the most angry was the way it had been planned in secret for a year and that we were being told to like it or lump it with no consultation, hence why it had to be leaked.
snap
Really? If it was like it or lump it why have they changed?
Thu May 31, 2012 9:55 pm
2blue2handle wrote:So why are we thanking the leaker?
Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:24 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Because it got leaked !!. Had they bought it in on the sly then it would of been to late to do anything.