Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:00 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Your bang on but the current owners have been here for 12 years surely they are football men now , 2 premiership campaigns a carling cup final that's a better record than any so called football men in the past .
Here we go again.
We were primed for Premier football before these guys turned up on the scene. It was Malky that got us there finally. Yet when these "football men" butted in, team selection etc etc that has come out in the open of late, we got relegated. Our next visit to Dream land was all down to Warnock. We nearly remained there with a Championship squad but for some bad decisions going against us. That was down to 2 things, Warnock management and these Football Men keeping out of it.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:02 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:07 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:22 pm
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:26 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:37 pm
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:47 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
And while the Committee have taken control we’ve also had our worst ever run of results ever in over 100 plus years of history a Fact.
And where are we now?
Sam took over a shithole of a club and League 4.
Tan took over a club one game from the Premier league and a new stadium built .
Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:06 pm
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
And while the Committee have taken control we’ve also had our worst ever run of results ever in over 100 plus years of history a Fact.
And where are we now?
Sam took over a shithole of a club and League 4.
Tan took over a club one game from the Premier league and a new stadium built .
And tan took us to the Premier league twice something sam never done he couldnt manage it once with all these so called great players he produced with a great squad you always go on about he left ,sams legacy was debt ,court cases against the club "He's ment to love " he was the one who brought in risdale and all the years of winding up orders from that appointment ,all sams legacies but the worse one that fans cant forgive him for is he nearly took us out of business completely for a 500k payment he wanted when pmg took over .short memory about Sam you got annis .Rose tinted glasses ignoring his bad legacies just coz hes your friend .
Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:14 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
And while the Committee have taken control we’ve also had our worst ever run of results ever in over 100 plus years of history a Fact.
And where are we now?
Sam took over a shithole of a club and League 4.
Tan took over a club one game from the Premier league and a new stadium built .
And tan took us to the Premier league twice something sam never done he couldnt manage it once with all these so called great players he produced with a great squad you always go on about he left ,sams legacy was debt ,court cases against the club "He's ment to love " he was the one who brought in risdale and all the years of winding up orders from that appointment ,all sams legacies but the worse one that fans cant forgive him for is he nearly took us out of business completely for a 500k payment he wanted when pmg took over .short memory about Sam you got annis .Rose tinted glasses ignoring his bad legacies just coz hes your friend .
Tan two relegations and a bigger debt and hammered every week. And stripped us of our identity, so for its was f*cking awful being up their looking like another club.
Sam Two promotions and NO relegations and left us 5pts clear at the top of the Championship.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:25 pm
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
And while the Committee have taken control we’ve also had our worst ever run of results ever in over 100 plus years of history a Fact.
And where are we now?
Sam took over a shithole of a club and League 4.
Tan took over a club one game from the Premier league and a new stadium built .
And tan took us to the Premier league twice something sam never done he couldnt manage it once with all these so called great players he produced with a great squad you always go on about he left ,sams legacy was debt ,court cases against the club "He's ment to love " he was the one who brought in risdale and all the years of winding up orders from that appointment ,all sams legacies but the worse one that fans cant forgive him for is he nearly took us out of business completely for a 500k payment he wanted when pmg took over .short memory about Sam you got annis .Rose tinted glasses ignoring his bad legacies just coz hes your friend .
Tan two relegations and a bigger debt and hammered every week. And stripped us of our identity, so for its was f*cking awful being up their looking like another club.
Sam Two promotions and NO relegations and left us 5pts clear at the top of the Championship.
24 million spent to get us to the championship some awefull signings
and losing 8 million a season with wage bill 125% of our income that was sams legacy when he jumped ship, If things were so rosey under sam why did he have to jump ship ?why didn't he say no to pmg and Ridsdale? .
Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:36 pm
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:17 pm
skiprat wrote:Wez 1927. What complete shit you spout .tan shut down the bluebirds for 2 and a half years replaced them with Cardiff red and you call that success?. No trophys failed to establish in premier League now near bottom of table.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:21 pm
wez1927 wrote:skiprat wrote:Wez 1927. What complete shit you spout .tan shut down the bluebirds for 2 and a half years replaced them with Cardiff red and you call that success?. No trophys failed to establish in premier League now near bottom of table.
Been back to the Premier league in blue since ,the facts are we have had our most successful period in our history arguably since sam left ,new stadium, fa cup final ,carling cup final ,playing in the Premier league ,bigger attendances ,more income , record transfer fees paid but people like you wash over the fact coz he made a mistake but rectify it by putting us back to blue ay.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:33 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Your bang on but the current owners have been here for 12 years surely they are football men now , 2 premiership campaigns a carling cup final that's a better record than any so called football men in the past .
Here we go again.
We were primed for Premier football before these guys turned up on the scene. It was Malky that got us there finally. Yet when these "football men" butted in, team selection etc etc that has come out in the open of late, we got relegated. Our next visit to Dream land was all down to Warnock. We nearly remained there with a Championship squad but for some bad decisions going against us. That was down to 2 things, Warnock management and these Football Men keeping out of it.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:34 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ian Gibson fanclub wrote:How anyone in their right mind would want Hammam back quite frankly astonishes me. And I have supported the city for 60 years. Never mind the colour of the shirts I remembet him cotemplating changing our name. I wonder how that would sit with Barclay and his thousands of mates
Just glad Im not one of them
Answer straight did he change our name?
Who changed our colour and badge ?
He asked our fans about badge and colour and Valley Rams told him to change badge to St.David’s.
I was fuming with him and never bought a single thing.
Still waiting for the answers??????
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:38 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
And while the Committee have taken control we’ve also had our worst ever run of results ever in over 100 plus years of history a Fact.
And where are we now?
Sam took over a shithole of a club and League 4.
Tan took over a club one game from the Premier league and a new stadium built .
And tan took us to the Premier league twice something sam never done he couldnt manage it once with all these so called great players he produced with a great squad you always go on about he left ,sams legacy was debt ,court cases against the club "He's ment to love " he was the one who brought in risdale and all the years of winding up orders from that appointment ,all sams legacies but the worse one that fans cant forgive him for is he nearly took us out of business completely for a 500k payment he wanted when pmg took over .short memory about Sam you got annis .Rose tinted glasses ignoring his bad legacies just coz hes your friend .
Tan two relegations and a bigger debt and hammered every week. And stripped us of our identity, so for its was f*cking awful being up their looking like another club.
Sam Two promotions and NO relegations and left us 5pts clear at the top of the Championship.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:40 pm
piledriver64 wrote:wez1927 wrote:skiprat wrote:Wez 1927. What complete shit you spout .tan shut down the bluebirds for 2 and a half years replaced them with Cardiff red and you call that success?. No trophys failed to establish in premier League now near bottom of table.
Been back to the Premier league in blue since ,the facts are we have had our most successful period in our history arguably since sam left ,new stadium, fa cup final ,carling cup final ,playing in the Premier league ,bigger attendances ,more income , record transfer fees paid but people like you wash over the fact coz he made a mistake but rectify it by putting us back to blue ay.
It's a bit like "What have the Romans done for us ........." in the Life of Brian for all the oldies![]()
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:40 pm
maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
And while the Committee have taken control we’ve also had our worst ever run of results ever in over 100 plus years of history a Fact.
And where are we now?
Sam took over a shithole of a club and League 4.
Tan took over a club one game from the Premier league and a new stadium built .
And tan took us to the Premier league twice something sam never done he couldnt manage it once with all these so called great players he produced with a great squad you always go on about he left ,sams legacy was debt ,court cases against the club "He's ment to love " he was the one who brought in risdale and all the years of winding up orders from that appointment ,all sams legacies but the worse one that fans cant forgive him for is he nearly took us out of business completely for a 500k payment he wanted when pmg took over .short memory about Sam you got annis .Rose tinted glasses ignoring his bad legacies just coz hes your friend .
Tan two relegations and a bigger debt and hammered every week. And stripped us of our identity, so for its was f*cking awful being up their looking like another club.
Sam Two promotions and NO relegations and left us 5pts clear at the top of the Championship.
So let me get this right for clarification.
When Sam owned us, the promotions were his doing and he left us 5 points clear at the top of the championship?
When Tan owned us, the promotions were due to Malky and Warnock? However the relegations were because of Tan?
Yep, very logical that.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:53 pm
Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:00 pm
maccydee wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Some very reasonable points made by both sides of the Tan vs Sam ‘supporters’ here. But I don’t understand why people say the owners not a football man or his CEO are not football men. Look at the likes of Liverpool and Man City, their owners and CEO’s are not exactly football men either. So why do we as a championship club need to have an owner and CEO who are football men, when the best clubs in the world don’t? I’d prefer to have people who understand finance more than football to run our club. The football side of it is down to the manager, and he’s told yes or no by the ‘committee’ whether it’s within budget.
Very true.
Big arguments these days for Football Directors.
Tan had never seen a football match till the Cardiff v Blackpool game play off Final at Wembley.
If he was a keen football or even a football fan would he not want to come and watch his club in person.
I think you def need a football man on board as well as investors.
He’s still waiting to see how many goals our goalie scores or if the painter wants the managers job.
So if your in a job for 12 years ,by your logic your not any good at that job and you don't learn ? Tans learnt the hard way about football and has written off his own money coz of it .
So you honestly believe Tan now knows football, just look at the state we are in now and he told the managers to play the U23 team in the first team this season and that’s why Steve Morison has stated on record we are where we are in the Championship, the table don’t lie and Morison only plays a couple of them and sometimes one or none.
If you own something for 12 years then I think you have a clue, your washing over the facts ,we in the last 12 years have had the most successful period in our history under Tan that that's the fact .the academy is arguably the best it's ever been ,talent in every age group ,great facilities it's night and day compared to the days under Sam the football man or Ridsdale or any other owner
And while the Committee have taken control we’ve also had our worst ever run of results ever in over 100 plus years of history a Fact.
And where are we now?
Sam took over a shithole of a club and League 4.
Tan took over a club one game from the Premier league and a new stadium built .
And tan took us to the Premier league twice something sam never done he couldnt manage it once with all these so called great players he produced with a great squad you always go on about he left ,sams legacy was debt ,court cases against the club "He's ment to love " he was the one who brought in risdale and all the years of winding up orders from that appointment ,all sams legacies but the worse one that fans cant forgive him for is he nearly took us out of business completely for a 500k payment he wanted when pmg took over .short memory about Sam you got annis .Rose tinted glasses ignoring his bad legacies just coz hes your friend .
Tan two relegations and a bigger debt and hammered every week. And stripped us of our identity, so for its was f*cking awful being up their looking like another club.
Sam Two promotions and NO relegations and left us 5pts clear at the top of the Championship.
So let me get this right for clarification.
When Sam owned us, the promotions were his doing and he left us 5 points clear at the top of the championship?
When Tan owned us, the promotions were due to Malky and Warnock? However the relegations were because of Tan?
Yep, very logical that.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:15 pm
Tue Feb 15, 2022 6:12 pm
Tue Feb 15, 2022 6:23 pm
Barclay1 wrote:To say our Academy is the best it's ever been is quite frankly ludicrous.
I'm not even going to back this argument as it is the biggest load of claptrap I've ever heard.
If We are to believe this is one of the regime's success stories then some people are delusional.
Tue Feb 15, 2022 6:30 pm
Tue Feb 15, 2022 6:45 pm
Barclay1 wrote:Facilities mean nothing, it's productivity that counts.
Easiest thing is to simply go back and start using the 'your negative vibe'. Those who hold the same opinion as me? They negative too?
Tue Feb 15, 2022 6:49 pm
maccydee wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Facilities mean nothing, it's productivity that counts.
Easiest thing is to simply go back and start using the 'your negative vibe'. Those who hold the same opinion as me? They negative too?
Totally agree.
Sam, Ridsdale or many of the owners before couldn’t get to the premier league. Tan did.
What’s more productive than that??
Tue Feb 15, 2022 7:03 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:maccydee wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Facilities mean nothing, it's productivity that counts.
Easiest thing is to simply go back and start using the 'your negative vibe'. Those who hold the same opinion as me? They negative too?
Totally agree.
Sam, Ridsdale or many of the owners before couldn’t get to the premier league. Tan did.
What’s more productive than that??
It was not Tan but Malky that got us there.
If its Tan then why did he not get us there when DJ was manager?
Tue Feb 15, 2022 7:07 pm
maccydee wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Facilities mean nothing, it's productivity that counts.
Easiest thing is to simply go back and start using the 'your negative vibe'. Those who hold the same opinion as me? They negative too?
Totally agree.
Sam, Ridsdale or many of the owners before couldn’t get to the premier league. Tan did.
What’s more productive than that??
Tue Feb 15, 2022 7:12 pm
Tue Feb 15, 2022 7:14 pm
Barclay1 wrote:maccydee wrote:Barclay1 wrote:Facilities mean nothing, it's productivity that counts.
Easiest thing is to simply go back and start using the 'your negative vibe'. Those who hold the same opinion as me? They negative too?
Totally agree.
Sam, Ridsdale or many of the owners before couldn’t get to the premier league. Tan did.
What’s more productive than that??
But the club got to the Premiership without any help from the Academy??
It's the productivity from the ACADEMY I'm on about.