Jack bastards chairman has quit

Also here is where I answered, I just thought I would address you, because you are a special little flower who deserves his own post you big celeb you

And to put it simply we are in a much more stable position than you, and we are preparing for that. We are putting money into the structure of the club a d training grounds and cat 1 academy. I just think imo that we are making good business decisions and have somewhat stable backing. If we don't go up we have enough to stay in the championship and build. If you don't then you'll be carrying on with someone who wants out. And that's where I form my opinion. But nothing is set in stone

Thanks for pointing this out, it seems in your enthusiasm to talk about me you forgot to answer the question and posted this after you realised, by that time I was already responding.

Anyway, to the points you make. The investments you are claiming to make is only to get what we already have, so if they are successful then that will put you where we are, it won’t put you above us. As for Cat 1 status, I don’t believe for one second you will get it while in the Championship and I’m not convinced that it’s as beneficial as you may think it is. Do you know how many players came through to our first team as a direct result of cat 1 status? I don’t believe any.

Have you looked at how you talk to people? I thought actually that I would address my issues with you as a person before giving your debate any credibility. Turns out you don't know everything.

Have you looked at how you talk to people? I thought actually that I would address my issues with you as a person before giving your debate any credibility. Turns out you don't know everything.

Yes very politely, it’s my upbringing I suppose.

I will rarely be rude except in situations where it seems someone’s sole purpose it to be personal and troll and then I shall do it in such a way as to not be too rude but to show their shortcomings for what they are. I have never claimed to know everything, but when I debate about something the chances are that specific topic is something I have in depth knowledge of.

For example, it’s no coincidence you don’t see me discussing horses or rugby on here. I have very little knowledge of either.

If you would like to take our discussion here for example. Would you like me to list all the rude things I have said and all the rude things you have said and list them side by side and get a count going? You wouldn’t fare well just to warn you

Let me know and I’ll happily do that to demonstrate the point.

Someone said a norti word, just because you use polite words it doesn't make you grater than, or any less condescending or assumptive. Here have another you are a c**t. Let's debate that shall we, I assume you know a lot about yourself

Someone said a norti word, just because you use polite words it doesn't make you grater than, or any less condescending or assumptive. Here have another you are a c**t. Let's debate that shall we, I assume you know a lot about yourself

I’m not having a go at you for being rude. I’m just making the point that telling someone who is polite that they don’t talk to people nicely when you have been extremely rude in every single post is extremely hypocritical. I wasn’t sure whether you were actually aware or not so was happy to show you.

But it seems you have no issue with being rude, and I have no issue with you being rude either. So we are back on speaking terms

Just to further that point and qualify it.

Out of the 80 threads on this first page of the forum, 5 topics have threads which are 3 pages or longer in contributions - 60% of those are about Swansea. 40% about Coronavirus. 0% are about Cardiff.

And 100% of those 3 topics would have died after about 8-10 comments if it wasn't for you turning it into a thread talking about how you are right and everyone else is wrong. For someone who claims to be so intelligent and successfull you really are a boring and petty c**t. 113 posts in less than a week. If there is one person on this forum who is obsessed, its you.

I love swearing its emotive its funny, its part of our language, why not use it. Doesn't make it unintelligent to swear. But your always eager with a list or bullet points, because you need that evidence. Anything to use to prove others wrong. Lmfao so utterly transparently pathetic. Anyway unlike some I have a life to get on with, I'll see you in a few months when I have the energy to try to understand what the f**k you are and why you are this weird obsessed lil goblin of a man, smooches bby, take care x

I love swearing its emotive its humerus its part of our language, why not use it. Doesn't make it unintelligent to swear. But your always eager with a list or bullet points, because you need that evidence. Anything to use to prove others wrong. Lmfao so utterly transparently pathetic. Anyway unlike some I have a life to get on with, I'll see you in a few months when I have the energy to try to understand what the f**k you are and why you are this weird obsessed lil goblin of a man, smooches bby, take care x

I’m not saying you shouldn’t use it, I’m just pointing out that it was you that had a go at me for how I was speaking to people, which was essentially politely, where as you were very rude in every one. I wasn’t saying I have an issue with it. The more rude people are the less confidence they have in their point, I always welcome abuse because it shows me what I’m saying hits home.

But you are welcome to debate the topic with me whenever you feel the urge. All the best.

Just to further that point and qualify it.

Out of the 80 threads on this first page of the forum, 5 topics have threads which are 3 pages or longer in contributions - 60% of those are about Swansea. 40% about Coronavirus. 0% are about Cardiff.

And 100% of those 3 topics would have died after about 8-10 comments if it wasn't for you turning it into a thread talking about how you are right and everyone else is wrong. For someone who claims to be so intelligent and successfull you really are a boring and petty c**t. 113 posts in less than a week. If there is one person on this forum who is obsessed, its you.

I disagree. Many topics on the forum about Swansea are multiple pages long before I even join. Happy to show you examples?

When I join these debates I simply give my view and explain why my view has been formed. In order to explain that I will often need to correct the context of the thread.

For example, saying “The Americans want to sell all the players to bank all the money for themselves”.

This is a topic which I have great interest in as a Swansea fan. In order to give my opinion on it I need to correct the context of the thread and explain that it is illegal to do that (many don’t realise) and explain why. That isn’t an obsession with proving people wrong, that’s joining a debate and wanting it to be based on accuracy otherwise what’s the point?

Don't get this shit twisted, I may be unsure about football and I said as such in my replies, who knows... Let's see. But I fully believe that you are a c**t and you take pride in it. But I would much rather have someone call me a dick and I know what they mean, than have some weak ass snake of a man trying to hide behind vailed attempts of passive aggressive point scoring and making himself feel or appear greater than

I love swearing its emotive its humerus its part of our language, why not use it. Doesn't make it unintelligent to swear. But your always eager with a list or bullet points, because you need that evidence. Anything to use to prove others wrong. Lmfao so utterly transparently pathetic. Anyway unlike some I have a life to get on with, I'll see you in a few months when I have the energy to try to understand what the f**k you are and why you are this weird obsessed lil goblin of a man, smooches bby, take care x

I’m not saying you shouldn’t use it, I’m just pointing out that it was you that had a go at me for how I was speaking to people, which was essentially politely, where as you were very rude in every one. I wasn’t saying I have an issue with it. The more rude people are the less confidence they have in their point, I always welcome abuse because it shows me what I’m saying hits home.

But you are welcome to debate the topic with me whenever you feel the urge. All the best.

Don't get this shit twisted, I may be unsure about football and I said as such in my replies, who knows... Let's see. But I fully believe that you are a c**t and you take pride in it. But I would much rather have someone call me a dick and I know what they mean, than have some weak ass snake of a man trying to hide behind vailed attempts of passive aggressive point scoring and making himself feel or appear greater than

I love swearing its emotive its humerus its part of our language, why not use it. Doesn't make it unintelligent to swear. But your always eager with a list or bullet points, because you need that evidence. Anything to use to prove others wrong. Lmfao so utterly transparently pathetic. Anyway unlike some I have a life to get on with, I'll see you in a few months when I have the energy to try to understand what the f**k you are and why you are this weird obsessed lil goblin of a man, smooches bby, take care x

I’m not saying you shouldn’t use it, I’m just pointing out that it was you that had a go at me for how I was speaking to people, which was essentially politely, where as you were very rude in every one. I wasn’t saying I have an issue with it. The more rude people are the less confidence they have in their point, I always welcome abuse because it shows me what I’m saying hits home.

But you are welcome to debate the topic with me whenever you feel the urge. All the best.

Where do you feel I have said veiled attempted insults? That seems to be the case when someone you are trying to bait into an argument refuses to rise to the debate. When that fails the person often pretends that the insults are hidden somewhere.

Or are you still mad because I said I would have preferred you to use paragraphs? It was more of a suggestion than an insult, but I apologise if it has hurt you...

But thanks for your input that thanks for sharing the football opinion although you have since said you aren’t sure. Better than many manage I suppose

....

....

Did you mean to type something there? If you think you have I don’t want you to think I’m rude by ignoring you. Doesn’t seem to have worked viewing it on my mobile anyway.

....

Did you mean to type something there? If you think you have I don’t want you to think I’m rude by ignoring you. Doesn’t seem to have worked viewing it on my mobile anyway.

....

Did you mean to type something there? If you think you have I don’t want you to think I’m rude by ignoring you. Doesn’t seem to have worked viewing it on my mobile anyway.

Don't worry about him even when people dont say anything he still needs to have last word? I stopped directly replying to him ages ago as talking to him is like having root canal work at dentist without gas! (Excruciatingly painful)

....

Did you mean to type something there? If you think you have I don’t want you to think I’m rude by ignoring you. Doesn’t seem to have worked viewing it on my mobile anyway.

Don't worry about him even when people dont say anything he still needs to have last word? I stopped directly replying to him ages ago as talking to him is like having root canal work at dentist without gas! (Excruciatingly painful)

I was trying to find out what he tried to post, why do people take offence when they join a debate in order to discuss something with me and I reply to them? If you don’t want me to reply to you then why are you posting?

Just to further that point and qualify it.

Out of the 80 threads on this first page of the forum, 5 topics have threads which are 3 pages or longer in contributions - 60% of those are about Swansea. 40% about Coronavirus. 0% are about Cardiff.

And 100% of those 3 topics would have died after about 8-10 comments if it wasn't for you turning it into a thread talking about how you are right and everyone else is wrong. For someone who claims to be so intelligent and successfull you really are a boring and petty c**t. 113 posts in less than a week. If there is one person on this forum who is obsessed, its you.

I disagree. Many topics on the forum about Swansea are multiple pages long before I even join. Happy to show you examples?

When I join these debates I simply give my view and explain why my view has been formed. In order to explain that I will often need to correct the context of the thread.

For example, saying “The Americans want to sell all the players to bank all the money for themselves”.

This is a topic which I have great interest in as a Swansea fan. In order to give my opinion on it I need to correct the context of the thread and explain that it is illegal to do that (many don’t realise) and explain why. That isn’t an obsession with proving people wrong, that’s joining a debate and wanting it to be based on accuracy otherwise what’s the point?

Go on then. I'm perfectly happy for you to waste your time and life on an absolutely meaningless task. Show us the many multiple page topics that specifically talk about swansea - not including threads regarding the playoffs, as the two clubs could have played each other they are a given. Give us 5 examples with the name of the thread, the date it was created and how many comments there were before you got involved. Also, what page the thread is on so we can all rush over to check!

....

Did you mean to type something there? If you think you have I don’t want you to think I’m rude by ignoring you. Doesn’t seem to have worked viewing it on my mobile anyway.

Don't worry about him even when people dont say anything he still needs to have last word? I stopped directly replying to him ages ago as talking to him is like having root canal work at dentist without gas! (Excruciatingly painful)

I was trying to find out what he tried to post, why do people take offence when they join a debate in order to discuss something with me and I reply to them? If you don’t want me to reply to you then why are you posting?

Just to further that point and qualify it.

Out of the 80 threads on this first page of the forum, 5 topics have threads which are 3 pages or longer in contributions - 60% of those are about Swansea. 40% about Coronavirus. 0% are about Cardiff.

And 100% of those 3 topics would have died after about 8-10 comments if it wasn't for you turning it into a thread talking about how you are right and everyone else is wrong. For someone who claims to be so intelligent and successfull you really are a boring and petty c**t. 113 posts in less than a week. If there is one person on this forum who is obsessed, its you.

I disagree. Many topics on the forum about Swansea are multiple pages long before I even join. Happy to show you examples?

When I join these debates I simply give my view and explain why my view has been formed. In order to explain that I will often need to correct the context of the thread.

For example, saying “The Americans want to sell all the players to bank all the money for themselves”.

This is a topic which I have great interest in as a Swansea fan. In order to give my opinion on it I need to correct the context of the thread and explain that it is illegal to do that (many don’t realise) and explain why. That isn’t an obsession with proving people wrong, that’s joining a debate and wanting it to be based on accuracy otherwise what’s the point?

Go on then. I'm perfectly happy for you to waste your time and life on an absolutely meaningless task. Show us the many multiple page topics that specifically talk about swansea - not including threads regarding the playoffs, as the two clubs could have played each other they are a given. Give us 5 examples with the name of the thread, the date it was created and how many comments there were before you got involved. Also, what page the thread is on so we can all rush over to check!

Well that’s an easy task, due to the amount of time Swansea has been mentioned that term can’t even be searched in the search tool anymore. However I was still able to type in jacks and hit some random pages.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212437&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=207500&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=214602&p=2201571&hilit=Jacks#p2201571

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=211509&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=210001&hilit=Jacks


Enjoy.

Well that’s an easy task, due to the amount of time Swansea has been mentioned that term can’t even be searched in the search tool anymore. However I was still able to type in jacks and hit some random pages.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212437&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=207500&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=214602&p=2201571&hilit=Jacks#p2201571

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=211509&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=210001&hilit=Jacks


Enjoy.

Well that’s an easy task, due to the amount of time Swansea has been mentioned that term can’t even be searched in the search tool anymore. However I was still able to type in jacks and hit some random pages.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212437&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=207500&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=214602&p=2201571&hilit=Jacks#p2201571

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=211509&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=210001&hilit=Jacks


Enjoy.

Well that’s an easy task, due to the amount of time Swansea has been mentioned that term can’t even be searched in the search tool anymore. However I was still able to type in jacks and hit some random pages.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212437&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=207500&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=214602&p=2201571&hilit=Jacks#p2201571

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=211509&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=210001&hilit=Jacks


Enjoy.

....

Did you mean to type something there? If you think you have I don’t want you to think I’m rude by ignoring you. Doesn’t seem to have worked viewing it on my mobile anyway.

what on earth makes you think that post has anything to do with you..?
and i wont find it rude if you do not reply...just pointing out the bleeding obvious...again...

....

Did you mean to type something there? If you think you have I don’t want you to think I’m rude by ignoring you. Doesn’t seem to have worked viewing it on my mobile anyway.

what on earth makes you think that post has anything to do with you..?
and i wont find it rude if you do not reply...just pointing out the bleeding obvious...again...

I had no idea what it was to do with, hence the question for clarification.

We were in the middle of a discussion so there was a fair chance it was to me.

Pretty obvious I would have thought.

Just to further that point and qualify it.

Out of the 80 threads on this first page of the forum, 5 topics have threads which are 3 pages or longer in contributions - 60% of those are about Swansea. 40% about Coronavirus. 0% are about Cardiff.

And 100% of those 3 topics would have died after about 8-10 comments if it wasn't for you turning it into a thread talking about how you are right and everyone else is wrong. For someone who claims to be so intelligent and successfull you really are a boring and petty c**t. 113 posts in less than a week. If there is one person on this forum who is obsessed, its you.

I disagree. Many topics on the forum about Swansea are multiple pages long before I even join. Happy to show you examples?

When I join these debates I simply give my view and explain why my view has been formed. In order to explain that I will often need to correct the context of the thread.

For example, saying “The Americans want to sell all the players to bank all the money for themselves”.

This is a topic which I have great interest in as a Swansea fan. In order to give my opinion on it I need to correct the context of the thread and explain that it is illegal to do that (many don’t realise) and explain why. That isn’t an obsession with proving people wrong, that’s joining a debate and wanting it to be based on accuracy otherwise what’s the point?

Go on then. I'm perfectly happy for you to waste your time and life on an absolutely meaningless task. Show us the many multiple page topics that specifically talk about swansea - not including threads regarding the playoffs, as the two clubs could have played each other they are a given. Give us 5 examples with the name of the thread, the date it was created and how many comments there were before you got involved. Also, what page the thread is on so we can all rush over to check!

Well that’s an easy task, due to the amount of time Swansea has been mentioned that term can’t even be searched in the search tool anymore. However I was still able to type in jacks and hit some random pages.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212437&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=207500&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=214602&p=2201571&hilit=Jacks#p2201571

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=211509&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=210001&hilit=Jacks


Enjoy.

Jesus wept. How sad

Just to further that point and qualify it.

Out of the 80 threads on this first page of the forum, 5 topics have threads which are 3 pages or longer in contributions - 60% of those are about Swansea. 40% about Coronavirus. 0% are about Cardiff.

And 100% of those 3 topics would have died after about 8-10 comments if it wasn't for you turning it into a thread talking about how you are right and everyone else is wrong. For someone who claims to be so intelligent and successfull you really are a boring and petty c**t. 113 posts in less than a week. If there is one person on this forum who is obsessed, its you.

I disagree. Many topics on the forum about Swansea are multiple pages long before I even join. Happy to show you examples?

When I join these debates I simply give my view and explain why my view has been formed. In order to explain that I will often need to correct the context of the thread.

For example, saying “The Americans want to sell all the players to bank all the money for themselves”.

This is a topic which I have great interest in as a Swansea fan. In order to give my opinion on it I need to correct the context of the thread and explain that it is illegal to do that (many don’t realise) and explain why. That isn’t an obsession with proving people wrong, that’s joining a debate and wanting it to be based on accuracy otherwise what’s the point?

Go on then. I'm perfectly happy for you to waste your time and life on an absolutely meaningless task. Show us the many multiple page topics that specifically talk about swansea - not including threads regarding the playoffs, as the two clubs could have played each other they are a given. Give us 5 examples with the name of the thread, the date it was created and how many comments there were before you got involved. Also, what page the thread is on so we can all rush over to check!

Well that’s an easy task, due to the amount of time Swansea has been mentioned that term can’t even be searched in the search tool anymore. However I was still able to type in jacks and hit some random pages.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212437&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=207500&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=214602&p=2201571&hilit=Jacks#p2201571

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=211509&hilit=Jacks

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=210001&hilit=Jacks


Enjoy.

Jesus wept. How sad

Indeed. My thoughts exactly, I was amazed how many there were actually.

Lovely little nibble there! Enjoyed that one haha

They aren’t nibbles, they are corrections.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Lovely little nibble there! Enjoyed that one haha

They aren’t nibbles, they are corrections.

You think the person who got all the information wrong intentionally in order to troll?

Seems weird.

Someone said a norti word, just because you use polite words it doesn't make you grater than, or any less condescending or assumptive. Here have another you are a c**t. Let's debate that shall we, I assume you know a lot about yourself

He loves debating on here so much, he’s had 100’s of usernames. I’d bet big money he wouldn’t never like to debate any of these things he cares so much about, on another clubs forum, to meet face to face to debate it. And that’s the type of loser we are dealing with.