Poll Global warming hoax or real ?

Wez you run a chippy ffs leave the science to the academics ffs

Wez you run a chippy ffs leave the science to the academics ffs

I voted Don't Care by the way I'll be dead in 20-30 years tops I'm not gonna waste time and energy worrying about something I cannot affect and won't affect me.

So what does the government do to tackle this so called climate change ? They put up car Tax, Petrol, Fuel Bills etc etc and where does the money go ? Yeah to pay for more bombs to drop on the Middle East.
Fake news for me big time. Stick your wind turbines up there arses they don't work properly, and the only ones that make money out of them is those that make them,and the Government !! as last time I heard they were charging every family extra every year to subsidise them. Coming back from West Wales to East Wales today and about 70% of them I passed were not even working.
Continents change over time and they have done massively in the Earths history and will continue to do so.
So drive yr fecking Hummers to Tesco's and don't feel any guilt

So what does the government do to tackle this so called climate change ? They put up car Tax, Petrol, Fuel Bills etc etc and where does the money go ? Yeah to pay for more bombs to drop on the Middle East.
Fake news for me big time. Stick your wind turbines up there arses they don't work properly, and the only ones that make money out of them is those that make them,and the Government !! as last time I heard they were charging every family extra every year to subsidise them. Coming back from West Wales to East Wales today and about 70% of them I passed were not even working.
Continents change over time and they have done massively in the Earths history and will continue to do so.
So drive yr fecking Hummers to Tesco's and don't feel any guilt

Top post

Recent data given out by the NOAA ignored sea temperatures provided by recording buoys, and instead took readings from ships that took on water, but the ships were obviously warmer, so the data couldn't be relied on. Then oddly enough, the NOAA managed to lose the data that it had used to extrapolate it's predictions, makes you wonder.

Recent data given out by the NOAA ignored sea temperatures provided by recording buoys, and instead took readings from ships that took on water, but the ships were obviously warmer, so the data couldn't be relied on. Then oddly enough, the NOAA managed to lose the data that it had used to extrapolate it's predictions, makes you wonder.

Big con ,like someone else said on this thread the earth is obviously getting warmer or we would be in an ice age is man responsible for it? I very much doubt it

Recent data given out by the NOAA ignored sea temperatures provided by recording buoys, and instead took readings from ships that took on water, but the ships were obviously warmer, so the data couldn't be relied on. Then oddly enough, the NOAA managed to lose the data that it had used to extrapolate it's predictions, makes you wonder.

Big con ,like someone else said on this thread the earth is obviously getting warmer or we would be in an ice age is man responsible for it? I very much doubt it

Why is it so black and white for you?

Of course the earth goes through these cycles naturally, it always has. But these things take time.

The North Pole was over 30 degrees warmer than it should have been last year. It lost sea ice the size of Denmark in a period where the sea ice should have been grown; during the arctic night.

This is happening during a period in which we are chopping the earths forests, and filling the atmosphere with methane and CO2, which warms it up. Methane warms the atmosphere at an alarming rate and takes a very long time to escape. The correlation isn't coincidental but alarming.

At the same time we are experiencing much more extreme weather in recent years, than we were before.

A recent study by 7 of the worlds leading climate authors, shows the greater the level of expertise within climate change, the higher the consensus on human made global-warming.

Those who oppose taking action to curb climate change I.e super rich and powerful oil companies, have engaged in a misinformation campaign to deny the existence of the expert consensus. They’ve been largely successful, as the public badly underestimate the expert consensus.

You see the great thing about science, is it is factual. It is backed with evidence, when you read the academically approved studies on climate change, the evidence is damming. It's up to you to go ahead and read those publishings, or believe some numpty with no expertise at all on the topic from the daily mail.

I'm in London and its fuckin freezing

Recent data given out by the NOAA ignored sea temperatures provided by recording buoys, and instead took readings from ships that took on water, but the ships were obviously warmer, so the data couldn't be relied on. Then oddly enough, the NOAA managed to lose the data that it had used to extrapolate it's predictions, makes you wonder.

Big con ,like someone else said on this thread the earth is obviously getting warmer or we would be in an ice age is man responsible for it? I very much doubt it

Why is it so black and white for you?

Of course the earth goes through these cycles naturally, it always has. But these things take time.

The North Pole was over 30 degrees warmer than it should have been last year. It lost sea ice the size of Denmark in a period where the sea ice should have been grown; during the arctic night.

This is happening during a period in which we are chopping the earths forests, and filling the atmosphere with methane and CO2, which warms it up. Methane warms the atmosphere at an alarming rate and takes a very long time to escape. The correlation isn't coincidental but alarming.

At the same time we are experiencing much more extreme weather in recent years, than we were before.

A recent study by 7 of the worlds leading climate authors, shows the greater the level of expertise within climate change, the higher the consensus on human made global-warming.

Those who oppose taking action to curb climate change I.e super rich and powerful oil companies, have engaged in a misinformation campaign to deny the existence of the expert consensus. They’ve been largely successful, as the public badly underestimate the expert consensus.

You see the great thing about science, is it is factual. It is backed with evidence, when you read the academically approved studies on climate change, the evidence is damming. It's up to you to go ahead and read those publishings, or believe some numpty with no expertise at all on the topic from the daily mail.

the great thing about science is that everything can challenged , not the other way around as you sugest. almost everything you believe in today has come about by scientists questioning the thoughts and ideas of their predecessors. Copernicus and Darwin were at the time of their claims shouted down,called idiots and fools. we live on a globe and have evolved via natural selection what idiotic thoughts . both would have been disputed by 97 % of scientists of the day.
yes the earth is warming but the readings dont go back far enough to conclude it has not warmed over this time span in the past.
anyway if these scientists are correct we are fcuked. so lets hope they are as wrong as the flat earthers hundreds of years ago.