Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:01 pm
davids wrote:In realty there was no real winner or loser in this particular court case.
Sam wanted his money back - he got it.
Tan wanted to know who Langton was/is - now he knows.
It's cost Tan an extra £2 million in a bonus though to find out something that he could have found out by looking at this message board i.e Sam = Langston!
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:02 pm
Forever Blue wrote:davids wrote:In realty there was no real winner or loser in this particular court case.
Sam wanted his money back - he got it.
Tan wanted to know who Langton was/is - now he knows.
It's cost Tan an extra £2 million in a bonus though to find out something that he could have found out by looking at this message board i.e Sam = Langston!
![]()
PLUS
David and £3mill in costs, was it really worth it, in my opinion NO
But hopefully we can all get back to supporting CCFC![]()
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:09 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:14 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:15 pm
davids wrote:Forever Blue wrote:davids wrote:In realty there was no real winner or loser in this particular court case.
Sam wanted his money back - he got it.
Tan wanted to know who Langton was/is - now he knows.
It's cost Tan an extra £2 million in a bonus though to find out something that he could have found out by looking at this message board i.e Sam = Langston!
![]()
PLUS
David and £3mill in costs, was it really worth it, in my opinion NO
But hopefully we can all get back to supporting CCFC![]()
On that I'm sure we can all agree!![]()
![]()
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:31 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:47 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:54 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:56 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:57 pm
cityblue wrote:Tan has got what he wanted, he wanted everyone to know that sam was behind langston and citys longstanding debt. I dont think he will be too bothered with the £3 mil costs, thats pocket change to a man like him.
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:07 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:07 pm
wez1927 wrote:davids wrote:Forever Blue wrote:langley wrote:So now out in open-Sam is Langston !
Myself personally I've never denied he was not to do with Langston???
You may not have Annis but I'm sure Sam has denied on more than one occasion that he is Langston and that he is just their "representative".
More smoke and mirrors.
Sam is just a lier full stop and has used a lot of peoole to get money back hasn't lost a penny on Cardiff City ,he run up huge debts and nearly took us in to liquidation a few times how anyone can ever defend him I just don't know hope he has gone away for good now
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:08 pm
Forever Blue wrote:I believe once the £5mill is paid, Sams Director will leave.
I said it time and time again, just before a court case, Tan always ends up having to pay up.
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:17 pm
cityone wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I believe once the £5mill is paid, Sams Director will leave.
I said it time and time again, just before a court case, Tan always ends up having to pay up.
Annis, you seem to get a lot of pleasure from seeing tan pay even more money to hammam, ok you don't like him and that's your choice, but how anybody can defend hammam's part in this is beyond me, he (hammam = langston) originally only put £3 million into cardiff city, he then borrowed £24 million + intrest against the club from citybank, when the loan was called in he put us on the brink of liquidation all the time denying he was langston. So summing up he has done cardiff city for about £25 million profit over the years, and all along he was telling eveyone how much he "loved the club" ........my arse he did.
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:28 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:30 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:36 pm
cityone wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I believe once the £5mill is paid, Sams Director will leave.
I said it time and time again, just before a court case, Tan always ends up having to pay up.
Annis, you seem to get a lot of pleasure from seeing tan pay even more money to hammam, ok you don't like him and that's your choice, but how anybody can defend hammam's part in this is beyond me, he (hammam = langston) originally only put £3 million into cardiff city, he then borrowed £24 million + intrest against the club from citybank, when the loan was called in he put us on the brink of liquidation all the time denying he was langston. So summing up he has done cardiff city for about £25 million profit over the years, and all along he was telling eveyone how much he "loved the club" ........my arse he did.
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:37 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:44 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:47 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:52 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:53 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Plus £2 million if Cardiff ever reach the Premier League.
So in total Aporox another £7million
Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:59 pm
Forever Blue wrote:davids wrote:Forever Blue wrote:davids wrote:In realty there was no real winner or loser in this particular court case.
Sam wanted his money back - he got it.
Tan wanted to know who Langton was/is - now he knows.
It's cost Tan an extra £2 million in a bonus though to find out something that he could have found out by looking at this message board i.e Sam = Langston!
![]()
PLUS
David and £3mill in costs, was it really worth it, in my opinion NO
But hopefully we can all get back to supporting CCFC![]()
On that I'm sure we can all agree!![]()
![]()
100%![]()
![]()
Yes, enough of court cases,only costly and it hurts our club at some stage, SO NO MORE FROM ME ON THIS MATTER![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
" TIME TO MOVE ON NOW AND SUPPORT THE MIGHTY BLUEBIRDS "
![]()
Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:01 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Another Terrible day for Tan
Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:03 pm
Forever Blue wrote:I believe once the £5mill is paid, Sams Director will leave.
I said it time and time again, just before a court case, Tan always ends up having to pay up.
Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:17 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:23 pm
Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:24 pm
welshrarebit wrote:Saw what you like about Tan but it seems this is the second thing he has been vindicated over.
The guy has made some errors of judgement on some things but others which he has been vilified over ... seem to have been spot on. Onwards and upwards now
Mon Feb 01, 2016 6:28 pm