Thu Nov 12, 2015 6:49 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:shinyBlueGlue wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Why haven't Russia attacked all the countries without nuclear deterrents IE most countries in the world.
I don't know if you are serious but why would they ? It would start WW3 .. However, if we never had nuclear weapons then maybe they would.
Have a look at the world news today, Russia have developed a nuclear torpedo that can devastate the coast of the US
![]()
That's what I have been trying to tell you in this thread. "WHY WOULD THEY?" attack us, exactly my point. You are saying we must keep our nukes to protect the world, I don't think we should be worlds policeman. Russia have developed a nuclear torpedo that can ruin the coast of America, doesn't mean they are going to use it.
Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:29 pm
shinyBlueGlue wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:shinyBlueGlue wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Why haven't Russia attacked all the countries without nuclear deterrents IE most countries in the world.
I don't know if you are serious but why would they ? It would start WW3 .. However, if we never had nuclear weapons then maybe they would.
Have a look at the world news today, Russia have developed a nuclear torpedo that can devastate the coast of the US
![]()
That's what I have been trying to tell you in this thread. "WHY WOULD THEY?" attack us, exactly my point. You are saying we must keep our nukes to protect the world, I don't think we should be worlds policeman. Russia have developed a nuclear torpedo that can ruin the coast of America, doesn't mean they are going to use it.
But if we didn't have them maybe they would use them
If the west got rid of their weapons and a war broke out between the west and Russia for whatever reason... what leverage would we have ? They could do what they wanted because the have nuclear weapons and we wouldn't
Unless the whole world got rid of nuclear weapons, we would be fools to get rid of ours
Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:50 pm
Sat Nov 14, 2015 1:11 am