Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:37 pm
whiterock wrote:We live within our means, if we can't afford it, we don't have it, not a bad philosophy and one that's stood us in good stead
Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:39 pm
Wiltshireblue wrote:whiterock wrote:We live within our means, if we can't afford it, we don't have it, not a bad philosophy and one that's stood us in good stead
Agreed, however for me you have been too conservative on this issue. The demand looks to be there but it isnt being capitalised on. Although I saw Jenkins say recently he wants to push ahead with it soon?
Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:53 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:whiterock wrote:We live within our means, if we can't afford it, we don't have it, not a bad philosophy and one that's stood us in good stead
Agreed, however for me you have been too conservative on this issue. The demand looks to be there but it isnt being capitalised on. Although I saw Jenkins say recently he wants to push ahead with it soon?
Creepy!
Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:01 pm
Wiltshireblue wrote:Plynlymonbluebird wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:whiterock wrote:We live within our means, if we can't afford it, we don't have it, not a bad philosophy and one that's stood us in good stead
Agreed, however for me you have been too conservative on this issue. The demand looks to be there but it isnt being capitalised on. Although I saw Jenkins say recently he wants to push ahead with it soon?
Creepy!
Not if they can fill it.
Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:08 pm
Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:17 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:Plynlymonbluebird wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:whiterock wrote:We live within our means, if we can't afford it, we don't have it, not a bad philosophy and one that's stood us in good stead
Agreed, however for me you have been too conservative on this issue. The demand looks to be there but it isnt being capitalised on. Although I saw Jenkins say recently he wants to push ahead with it soon?
Creepy!
Not if they can fill it.
No evidence they could!
Parlez, one of their most influential fans(lol) wouldn't pay the going rate for tickets when he was home from his millionaire life in Australia!
Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:34 pm
Fri Aug 28, 2015 12:03 am
Wiltshireblue wrote:So people keep saying. Speak a bit of sense on a subject that some dont like to face up to and all hell breaks loose it seems.
Fri Aug 28, 2015 12:21 am
Woodville Willie wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:So people keep saying. Speak a bit of sense on a subject that some dont like to face up to and all hell breaks loose it seems.
So how do you go about extending a stadium owned by someone else (the council).
Surely you'd have to buy the stadium first. Wouldn't that leave you (I mean them lol) strapped for cash?
Fri Aug 28, 2015 6:10 am
Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:13 am
Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:14 am
Wiltshireblue wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:So people keep saying. Speak a bit of sense on a subject that some dont like to face up to and all hell breaks loose it seems.
So how do you go about extending a stadium owned by someone else (the council).
Surely you'd have to buy the stadium first. Wouldn't that leave you (I mean them lol) strapped for cash?
Either buying it outright, or owning a share of the stadium in perfentage proportion to the expansion id have thought. That is a question you would have to level at the planners at Swansea HQ.
Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:33 am
griff105 wrote:Whiterock and Wiltshireblue and whereami is making some good points on this thread.
Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:42 am
Wiltshireblue wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:So people keep saying. Speak a bit of sense on a subject that some dont like to face up to and all hell breaks loose it seems.
So how do you go about extending a stadium owned by someone else (the council).
Surely you'd have to buy the stadium first. Wouldn't that leave you (I mean them lol) strapped for cash?
Either buying it outright, or owning a share of the stadium in perfentage proportion to the expansion id have thought. That is a question you would have to level at the planners at Swansea HQ.
Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:53 am
Woodville Willie wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:So people keep saying. Speak a bit of sense on a subject that some dont like to face up to and all hell breaks loose it seems.
So how do you go about extending a stadium owned by someone else (the council).
Surely you'd have to buy the stadium first. Wouldn't that leave you (I mean them lol) strapped for cash?
Either buying it outright, or owning a share of the stadium in perfentage proportion to the expansion id have thought. That is a question you would have to level at the planners at Swansea HQ.
Like I said though, if they buy the stadium, won't that interfere with their prudent spending policy? They may have less money to maintain the squad if key players leave.???
Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:04 pm
Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:07 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wiltshireblue wrote:So people keep saying. Speak a bit of sense on a subject that some dont like to face up to and all hell breaks loose it seems.
So how do you go about extending a stadium owned by someone else (the council).
Surely you'd have to buy the stadium first. Wouldn't that leave you (I mean them lol) strapped for cash?
Either buying it outright, or owning a share of the stadium in perfentage proportion to the expansion id have thought. That is a question you would have to level at the planners at Swansea HQ.
Like I said though, if they buy the stadium, won't that interfere with their prudent spending policy? They may have less money to maintain the squad if key players leave.???
Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:10 pm
whiterock wrote:Whilst in the ideal world buying the stadium would be preferable but it's not essential, the way we have gone about things is just about right and perhaps if u had done similar then who knows what league you would have been in?
1. Spend enough to sustain PL football over 5 years
2. Build state of the art training complex
3. Build state of the art training complex with indie barn befitting Category One for our academy
4. Expand stadium
5. In time, purchase stadium
Don't forget, swansea don't have or need a sugar daddy and that's why it has to do things in order and live within its means. #proud
Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:27 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:whiterock wrote:Whilst in the ideal world buying the stadium would be preferable but it's not essential, the way we have gone about things is just about right and perhaps if u had done similar then who knows what league you would have been in?
1. Spend enough to sustain PL football over 5 years
2. Build state of the art training complex
3. Build state of the art training complex with indie barn befitting Category One for our academy
4. Expand stadium
5. In time, purchase stadium
Don't forget, swansea don't have or need a sugar daddy and that's why it has to do things in order and live within its means. #proud
You forgot about the creditors that you screwed and clubs who now have to have points deductions for Cva.
Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:32 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:
Like I said though, if they buy the stadium, won't that interfere with their prudent spending policy? They may have less money to maintain the squad if key players leave.???
Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:33 pm
whiterock wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:whiterock wrote:Whilst in the ideal world buying the stadium would be preferable but it's not essential, the way we have gone about things is just about right and perhaps if u had done similar then who knows what league you would have been in?
1. Spend enough to sustain PL football over 5 years
2. Build state of the art training complex
3. Build state of the art training complex with indie barn befitting Category One for our academy
4. Expand stadium
5. In time, purchase stadium
Don't forget, swansea don't have or need a sugar daddy and that's why it has to do things in order and live within its means. #proud
You forgot about the creditors that you screwed and clubs who now have to have points deductions for Cva.
They were the rules, did u ever see the list who was owed money? The few local businesses were happy to waiver monies owed to see the club survive, the only ones who challenged the CVA were a few ex players who had had a good living out of swansea and that odious tit ML.
I saw a few cronies of ML on the list too. Dubious characters to say the least and there was no way we owed them money but for what ever reason, were on the list
Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:50 pm
Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:41 pm
Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:42 pm
Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:44 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:No.
Swansea are Wales' most successful club, in recent years. But Cardiff City are still the biggest club in Wales.
Manchester United are just about the biggest club in England. To the above post - Chelsea or City will NEVER be bigger than United. Liverpool are the closest to them.