Wed Dec 31, 2014 5:47 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:26 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 6:43 am
super kev legend wrote:If you're not prepared to boycott even now, you'll never be prepared. Your choice of course but very disappointed just as we got the momentum you come out with this.![]()
![]()
![]()
Wed Dec 31, 2014 7:39 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Personally I feel the argument about filling Tans pockets is a sign of accepting his re-brand is not at all strong.
If I boycotted Tan would not miss my money one bit. So giving him a few pennies to keep the stadium proper blue is a price worth paying. I know Tan hates seeing the blue in his own back yard and he would be quite happy having crowds of around 10,000 wearing predominant red.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:11 am
Bluebird1977 wrote:super kev legend wrote:If you're not prepared to boycott even now, you'll never be prepared. Your choice of course but peaceful disappointed just as we got the momentum you come out with this.![]()
![]()
![]()
[/quotI'm s
Agreed. The bit where Carl states " we must choose are battle carefully and not enter a battle we can not win" says it all for me. In my opinion he's scared of the outcome of tan pulls out as it seems his post is half hearted on one hand he don't like what's gone on which tan WIll not change clearly as stated and the next it's renew your season ticket and keep it blue. That's not going to work as proven over the years already. Each to there own but that makes no sence to me as we are already in a BATTLE.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:54 am
Blazing Saddles wrote:Very disappointed with both Carl and Annis here. 100% no blue no renew is the way forward!!!! Both seem to be bottling it a little when we need to be making a statement. Short term pain for long term gain, please don't bottle it you two - please don't.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:02 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:24 am
ThomasC wrote:a very divisive issue, I see both sides. I actually agree with both sides and I personally think it comes down to preference.
Nobody can be blamed for not wanting to give the club any more money on the turnstiles until the club starts treating them with respect and changes back to Blue.
I also agree that the presence of Blue is needed in the stands, and affirmative action to be continued to keep the pressure on.
This will come down to the individual what they wish to do.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:58 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:12 am
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:Very disappointed with both Carl and Annis here. 100% no blue no renew is the way forward!!!! Both seem to be bottling it a little when we need to be making a statement. Short term pain for long term gain, please don't bottle it you two - please don't.
I tend to agree with you.
The excuse of showing the support inside the stadium is nonsense IMO.
The 19:27 is pretty poor (I never fail to join in) although all around me people just sit around & show nothing! The Canton is getting emptier all the time & the singing - always be Blue & Tan out is virtually non-existent.
NoBlueNoRenew is the only way I believe.
Like you say Saddles - short term pain for long term gain. Perhaps some people don't want it as bad as they make out but it's their prerogative. We missed the boat once, NOW is the time to act positively & aggressively.
Such a shame.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:45 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:51 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:20 am
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Certain supporters are making renew or not a personal choice, which it should not be, those supporters with the most influence "fans leaders" did not stand up enough in the first place, they did not lead and that's one reason why we are where we are today. This is another opportunity to stand together, make sacrifices and try to make a difference, yet now, already we cannot agree on a way forward. I hope I'm wrong, but I fear that those high profile long time supporters such are more interested in protecting their own record of having a consecative season ticket for the last 40 years over taking a real moral stance. It reminds me of when we played up at Leeds a few years ago and many of our supporters wanted all City fans to boycott as, they were sick and tired of being treated like animals, having bubble trips installed for no other reason other than the authorities could. The majority did boycott, yet there were still 150 who refused, stating that it was their choice and they would always follow City no matter what. A situation without one City fan would have made a statement, yet individuals saw themselves as more important than the collective. Unfortunately, City fans have always been like that.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:23 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:44 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:47 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:48 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:53 am
Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:14 pm
Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:19 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:Very disappointed with both Carl and Annis here. 100% no blue no renew is the way forward!!!! Both seem to be bottling it a little when we need to be making a statement. Short term pain for long term gain, please don't bottle it you two - please don't.
I tend to agree with you.
The excuse of showing the support inside the stadium is nonsense IMO.
The 19:27 is pretty poor (I never fail to join in) although all around me people just sit around & show nothing! The Canton is getting emptier all the time & the singing - always be Blue & Tan out is virtually non-existent.
NoBlueNoRenew is the only way I believe.
Like you say Saddles - short term pain for long term gain. Perhaps some people don't want it as bad as they make out but it's their prerogative. We missed the boat once, NOW is the time to act positively & aggressively.
Such a shame.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:07 pm
Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:15 pm
mallo wrote:No blue no renew you can still wear your blue outside every game to show your passion don't need to be an empty stadium of tan Coventry fans did it
Wed Dec 31, 2014 2:15 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Carl and annis are getting it on mikes board in a thread![]()
The Lone Gunman said ....
So predictable.
Let's be honest, nobody seriously believed that a man with no principles would give up his Echo column, the cash he earns from his coach trips and his position as a self-appointed superfan on a matter of principle, did they?
Curtis thrives on the attention he gets from his sycophants on AAMB, journalists and club officials. The chances of him doing the right thing were always zero.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 3:14 pm
Wed Dec 31, 2014 3:30 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Carl and annis are getting it on mikes board in a thread![]()
The Lone Gunman said ....
So predictable.
Let's be honest, nobody seriously believed that a man with no principles would give up his Echo column, the cash he earns from his coach trips and his position as a self-appointed superfan on a matter of principle, did they?
Curtis thrives on the attention he gets from his sycophants on AAMB, journalists and club officials. The chances of him doing the right thing were always zero.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 3:41 pm
Luca_Blue wrote:Why isn't this thread locked anymore?
Wed Dec 31, 2014 4:10 pm
Wed Dec 31, 2014 4:13 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Carl and annis are getting it on mikes board in a thread![]()
The Lone Gunman said ....
So predictable.
Let's be honest, nobody seriously believed that a man with no principles would give up his Echo column, the cash he earns from his coach trips and his position as a self-appointed superfan on a matter of principle, did they?
Curtis thrives on the attention he gets from his sycophants on AAMB, journalists and club officials. The chances of him doing the right thing were always zero.
Yes I have heard people accuse this guy of being bitter but good grief.
Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:55 pm