Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:36 am

To claim that Mackay isn't responsible for spending the money is absolutely absurd. :laughing6:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:38 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:To claim that Mackay isn't responsible for spending the money is absolutely absurd. :laughing6:


Did I say that.

I said he spent what was offered to him by Tan. Tan allowed him to spend the money. Tan okayed everything that has put us in this much debt.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:41 am

Mario wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:To claim that Mackay isn't responsible for spending the money is absolutely absurd. :laughing6:


Did I say that..


Yes, you did.

Mario wrote:Jesus, I have said Mackay spent some of the money badly. Does that mean he is liable for spending it? Nope.


Liable/responsible are the same thing. :laughing6:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:41 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Mario wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:To claim that Mackay isn't responsible for spending the money is absolutely absurd. :laughing6:


Did I say that..


Yes, you did.

Mario wrote:Jesus, I have said Mackay spent some of the money badly. Does that mean he is liable for spending it? Nope.


Liable/responsible are the same thing. :laughing6:


Liable for getting us into debt.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:42 am

Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:43 am

Cardiff Daft! wrote:Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.


This is basically what I meant.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:43 am

Mario wrote:Liable for getting us into debt.


You said liable for spending it.

Mario wrote:Jesus, I have said Mackay spent some of the money badly. Does that mean he is liable for spending it? Nope.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:45 am

I didn't word is well.

He is responsible for shit transfers, but spending money offered to him, not imo.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 11:47 am

Cardiff Daft! wrote:Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.


Moody negotiated the packages

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 12:00 pm

Mario wrote:I didn't word is well.

He is responsible for shit transfers, but spending money offered to him, not imo.


That just doesn't make sense.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 12:00 pm

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.


Moody negotiated the packages


Cheers, thought it either was him or that weasel Lim.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 12:02 pm

Cardiff Daft! wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.


Moody negotiated the packages


Cheers, thought it either was him or that weasel Lim.


I am led to believe Moody negotiated with the players representatives but that weasel faced chinese Andrew Lloyd Webber should never have esacped punishment if there was a 15m overspend on budget. :twisted:

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 12:06 pm

Kenfig Blue wrote:
Mario wrote:I didn't word is well.

He is responsible for shit transfers, but spending money offered to him, not imo.


That just doesn't make sense.


I understand it in my head.

Breaking News: Kenfig Blue appointed Cardiff City manager:

Tan comes to you and says, we have 20 million pound to spend in the summer.

You spend that money.

The transfers fail and we go down to league one.

Then a lynch mob comes after you saying you have put the club into debt.

Is it your fault for spending the money? No. Is it your fault for bad transfers? Yes.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 12:08 pm

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.


Moody negotiated the packages


Cheers, thought it either was him or that weasel Lim.


I am led to believe Moody negotiated with the players representatives but that weasel faced chinese Andrew Lloyd Webber should never have esacped punishment if there was a 15m overspend on budget. :twisted:


:lol: chinese Andrew Lloyd Webber, good one. He can do no wrong in Tans eyes. Pins the whole blame on Malky & Moody and he gets away scot free.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 12:16 pm

Cardiff Daft! wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.


Moody negotiated the packages


Cheers, thought it either was him or that weasel Lim.


I am led to believe Moody negotiated with the players representatives but that weasel faced chinese Andrew Lloyd Webber should never have esacped punishment if there was a 15m overspend on budget. :twisted:


:lol: chinese Andrew Lloyd Webber, good one. He can do no wrong in Tans eyes. Pins the whole blame on Malky & Moody and he gets away scot free.


Yep agreed. He was just as culpable as M&M for the overspend but as you say he can do no wrong in Tans eyes.

He is the epitome of a little kiss ass yes man. Hes got on of those faces youd like to smash a claw hammer into.

Re: Style over Subtance debate....

Fri May 02, 2014 12:22 pm

CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:
Cardiff Daft! wrote:Tan should have had more sense than to just let an inexperienced manager loose with his cheque book.

Who was responsible for agreeing wages with players, that wasnt Malky was it??

Malky wasted the money but Tan shouldnt have ever let him do that in the first place.

It really was a case of the blind leading the blind.


Moody negotiated the packages


Cheers, thought it either was him or that weasel Lim.


I am led to believe Moody negotiated with the players representatives but that weasel faced chinese Andrew Lloyd Webber should never have esacped punishment if there was a 15m overspend on budget. :twisted:


:lol: chinese Andrew Lloyd Webber, good one. He can do no wrong in Tans eyes. Pins the whole blame on Malky & Moody and he gets away scot free.


Yep agreed. He was just as culpable as M&M for the overspend but as you say he can do no wrong in Tans eyes.

He is the epitome of a little kiss ass yes man. Hes got on of those faces youd like to smash a claw hammer into.


:lol: