Garry Monk nets the Swans job permanently

Theres a difference between caring and posting. No one gives a shit but they post to tell you to f**k off.

Maybe this gives you the attention you are lacking in real life, who knows?.

No there isnt Wonka. The heading is clear, if you are interested in reading then you will click, if not then you wont.

However you may click on it and then decide to protest how uninterested you are

Im saying so far Garry Monk has a better Premier League points per game ratio as Swansea manager than Brendan Rodgers.

Not quite the same though hey,good result today though,actually staying in same hotel as villa,spoke to some of their players this morning,and they didn't seem up for the game,moaning about how bad the weather was more than anything

Not quite the same? Id say a manager gaining more points than than another is a good indicator wouldnt you?

He hasnt had a full season yet just a third of one. Rodgers had two thirds of a season more.

But as of this moment i would prefer us with monks points per game than Rodgers record.

You would rather have monk than Rodgers?

You would rather have monk than Rodgers?

Id rather have Monks record so far than Rodgers record.

You would rather have monk than Rodgers?

Id rather have Monks record so far than Rodgers record.

Answer the question roathie. This is where you lose peoples respect on the board. You are like a politician in this sense.

Im saying so far Garry Monk has a better Premier League points per game ratio as Swansea manager than Brendan Rodgers.

Not quite the same though hey,good result today though,actually staying in same hotel as villa,spoke to some of their players this morning,and they didn't seem up for the game,moaning about how bad the weather was more than anything

Not quite the same? Id say a manager gaining more points than than another is a good indicator wouldnt you?

He hasnt had a full season yet just a third of one. Rodgers had two thirds of a season more.

But as of this moment i would prefer us with monks points per game than Rodgers record.

So in other words you d prefer monk to Rogers?,or do you just pick the stats and facts that suit your debates the best?

You would rather have monk than Rodgers?

Id rather have Monks record so far than Rodgers record.

Answer the question roathie. This is where you lose peoples respect on the board. You are like a politician in this sense.

Im telling you exactly.

If someone said Rodgers could take over from Laudrup until the end of the season and he will get per game what he always did with you or Monk can take over and get a slightly better one (which he has) - then Monk is the obvious choice.

As for who i would prefer beyond that... it depends if Monk keeps this up.

yessss down to bokies at beginning season to put my only ever bet on for them to 1 get relegated, 2 monk to be sacked by xmas!

The same jacks to get relegated bet every season would have thought you would have learned a leason by now.

not sure about monk yet. To be honest hes only beaten dog shit sides so far. although signs have been good so far even in games we didn't win.

Theres a difference between caring and posting. No one gives a shit but they post to tell you to f**k off.

Maybe this gives you the attention you are lacking in real life, who knows?.

No there isnt Wonka. The heading is clear, if you are interested in reading then you will click, if not then you wont.

However you may click on it and then decide to protest how uninterested you are

Ive read nothing in this post. I simply wrote i dont care, then clicked off it.

Theres a difference between caring and posting. No one gives a shit but they post to tell you to f**k off.

Maybe this gives you the attention you are lacking in real life, who knows?.

No there isnt Wonka. The heading is clear, if you are interested in reading then you will click, if not then you wont.

However you may click on it and then decide to protest how uninterested you are

Ive read nothing in this post. I simply wrote i dont care, then clicked off it.

Wrong.

You would rather have monk than Rodgers?

Id rather have Monks record so far than Rodgers record.

Answer the question roathie. This is where you lose peoples respect on the board. You are like a politician in this sense.

Im telling you exactly.

If someone said Rodgers could take over from Laudrup until the end of the season and he will get per game what he always did with you or Monk can take over and get a slightly better one (which he has) - then Monk is the obvious choice.

As for who i would prefer beyond that... it depends if Monk keeps this up.

Reply with just a simple monk or Rodgers.

Reply with just a simple monk or Rodgers.

I cant if i dont know.

I can only judge on so far - so far Monk as the has a better record.

But if you are offering me a manager on a contract of a few years then its impossibke to say as we dont know if Monk will continue superb start.

I just cannot believe people talk to you on a daily basis in the real world.

f*cking hard work you are.

I just cannot believe people talk to you on a daily basis in the real world.

f*cking hard work you are.

Because I dont know an answer to your question?

I think ive explained it incredibly well.

I just cannot believe people talk to you on a daily basis in the real world.

f*cking hard work you are.

Because I dont know an answer to your question?

I think ive explained it incredibly well.

You've rambled, I asked for a simple one name answer, u you don't know then just say YOU DONT KNOW.

My f*cking life you make me ill.

You asked a question based on my stat.

Ive given an answer in terms of the stat but am unable to give on based on future events.

I think thats fair, if that makes you ill then i worry for you.

I asked you a question, I didn't answer you a question based on your stat.

I asked you a question, I didn't answer you a question based on your stat.

There is no way on this planet you would have asked me who i would prefer Rodgers or Monk if i didnt produce a stat showing Monk has a better record thus far.

I asked you a question, I didn't answer you a question based on your stat.

There is no way on this planet you would have asked me who i would prefer Rodgers or Monk if i didnt produce a stat showing Monk has a better record thus far.

Prove it.

I asked you a question, I didn't answer you a question based on your stat.

There is no way on this planet you would have asked me who i would prefer Rodgers or Monk if i didnt produce a stat showing Monk has a better record thus far.

Prove it.

Common sense and probablility proves it for me.

Why on earth would you bringup rodgers if i didnt just compare their records.

Deny it all you like but you will just look silly.

I asked you a question, I didn't answer you a question based on your stat.

There is no way on this planet you would have asked me who i would prefer Rodgers or Monk if i didnt produce a stat showing Monk has a better record thus far.

Prove it.

Common sense and probablility proves it for me.

Why on earth would you bringup rodgers if i didnt just compare their records.

Deny it all you like but you will just look silly.

Prove it.

Theres a difference between caring and posting. No one gives a shit but they post to tell you to f**k off.

Maybe this gives you the attention you are lacking in real life, who knows?.

No there isnt Wonka. The heading is clear, if you are interested in reading then you will click, if not then you wont.

However you may click on it and then decide to protest how uninterested you are

Ive read nothing in this post. I simply wrote i dont care, then clicked off it.

Yes of course you have! And thats why your replying to Roathie, because you haven't read his posts! What a numpty!

I asked you a question, I didn't answer you a question based on your stat.

There is no way on this planet you would have asked me who i would prefer Rodgers or Monk if i didnt produce a stat showing Monk has a better record thus far.

Prove it.

Common sense and probablility proves it for me.

Why on earth would you bringup rodgers if i didnt just compare their records.

Deny it all you like but you will just look silly.

Prove it.

Just did

f*cking stupid thread, Managing is not about guiding someone else's signings till the end of the season, a large percentage of the job is done with contacts in the transfer windows, that where in the past most of your recent Managers have done well.

Who is that tw*t going to sign, Alan Tate ???

f*cking stupid thread, Managing is not about guiding someone else's signings till the end of the season, a large percentage of the job is done with contacts in the transfer windows, that where in the past most of your recent Managers have done well.

Who is that tw*t going to sign, Alan Tate ???

Good point, lets sell em all

I asked you a question, I didn't answer you a question based on your stat.

There is no way on this planet you would have asked me who i would prefer Rodgers or Monk if i didnt produce a stat showing Monk has a better record thus far.

Prove it.

Common sense and probablility proves it for me.

Why on earth would you bringup rodgers if i didnt just compare their records.

Deny it all you like but you will just look silly.

Prove it.

Just did

Prove it.

Just did

Just did

Proof?

Common sense and probability

Common sense and probability

Actual proof?

Yep