Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:58 am
Bakedalasker wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bad decision.
Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.
What about accusations that are wrong?
sounds like you are taking your arse in your hand and abusing your "power" to me
For a start I didn't ban him and I would suggest you find out the full story before gobbing off.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:02 am
Bakedalasker wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Jinks wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bad decision.
Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.
What about accusations that are wrong?
I believe that reason is just being used as an excuse to ban him.. hardly crime of the century is it.
You believe wrong.
why is he banned then?
Well Paul without getting personal the guy has been trolling Annis on other medias. I've seen the scripts and Annis has a good case for harassment.
Adding to this I have heard Natman has got a solicitor involved. That is more than a good enough reason to deny the guy access to anything.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:08 am
TripleD wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Jinks wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bad decision.
Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.
What about accusations that are wrong?
I believe that reason is just being used as an excuse to ban him.. hardly crime of the century is it.
You believe wrong.
why is he banned then?
Well Paul without getting personal the guy has been trolling Annis on other medias. I've seen the scripts and Annis has a good case for harassment.
Adding to this I have heard Natman has got a solicitor involved. That is more than a good enough reason to deny the guy access to anything.
So absolutely nothing done wrong on HERE then?
This place stinks.
Admin/Mods need to pick up their toys and stop pouting.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:08 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:08 am
maccydee wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Dylanthomas wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bad decision.
Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.
What about accusations that are wrong?
Trouble is if your accused of something or being someone and get banned. It's hard to put your point over that's not what you've said or who you are ,some are allowed back on here or change their name but when the person concerned has done nothing wrong and can't defend themselves
The irony is baked would have been banned ten times over if he practiced what he preached. He made the ultimate of incorrect accusations and didnt as much as apologise, instead deleted the thread and evidence when others pointed out how vile and uncalled for it was![]()
Id decided to leave it there and move on - but im always one to speak out when I see a wrong and this double standard hypocricy is embarrassingly ridiculous.
This is f**k all to do with you so why are you getting involved.
You wanted our episode to be brought to an end yet you have brought it up again. Your the one showing double standards here.
You're
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:14 am
citybluechris wrote:ohhh noooo he didn't!, OHHH YESSS HE DID! f*cking pantomime be fucked
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:16 am
TripleD wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Jinks wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bad decision.
Nobody should be banned unless abusive, otherwise it becomes a farce.
What about accusations that are wrong?
I believe that reason is just being used as an excuse to ban him.. hardly crime of the century is it.
You believe wrong.
why is he banned then?
Well Paul without getting personal the guy has been trolling Annis on other medias. I've seen the scripts and Annis has a good case for harassment.
Adding to this I have heard Natman has got a solicitor involved. That is more than a good enough reason to deny the guy access to anything.
So absolutely nothing done wrong on HERE then?
This place stinks.
Admin/Mods need to pick up their toys and stop pouting.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:19 am
Bakedalasker wrote:
Are you serious?
So the guy hounds the owner of the site but because you think he has not done anything wrong on here, of which he has done by his accusations, he should not be banned.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:26 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:
Are you serious?
So the guy hounds the owner of the site but because you think he has not done anything wrong on here, of which he has done by his accusations, he should not be banned.
You keep ignoring this Ian...
Do you think your false accusation you made was out of order too? In fact to a far worse degree.
Surely your answer is yes. So then how come you give this as justification while being quite happy with the fact you are still allowed to post?
Answer that without re-directing it somewhere else, and ill leave it there.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:27 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:30 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:
Are you serious?
So the guy hounds the owner of the site but because you think he has not done anything wrong on here, of which he has done by his accusations, he should not be banned.
You keep ignoring this Ian...
Do you think your false accusation you made was out of order too? In fact to a far worse degree.
Surely your answer is yes. So then how come you give this as justification while being quite happy with the fact you are still allowed to post?
Answer that without re-directing it somewhere else, and ill leave it there.
As I have pmed you Philip go cry somewhere else.
This is not about Natman Blue but all about yourself.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:31 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:
Are you serious?
So the guy hounds the owner of the site but because you think he has not done anything wrong on here, of which he has done by his accusations, he should not be banned.
You keep ignoring this Ian...
Do you think your false accusation you made was out of order too? In fact to a far worse degree.
Surely your answer is yes. So then how come you give this as justification while being quite happy with the fact you are still allowed to post?
Answer that without re-directing it somewhere else, and ill leave it there.
As I have pmed you Philip go cry somewhere else.
This is not about Natman Blue but all about yourself.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:32 am
TripleD wrote:citybluechris wrote:ohhh noooo he didn't!, OHHH YESSS HE DID! f*cking pantomime be fucked
Grow up mate.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:35 am
citybluechris wrote:TripleD wrote:citybluechris wrote:ohhh noooo he didn't!, OHHH YESSS HE DID! f*cking pantomime be fucked
Grow up mate.
think its everyone else needs grow up over poxy forum, solicitors, false accusations
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:44 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:
Are you serious?
So the guy hounds the owner of the site but because you think he has not done anything wrong on here, of which he has done by his accusations, he should not be banned.
You keep ignoring this Ian...
Do you think your false accusation you made was out of order too? In fact to a far worse degree.
Surely your answer is yes. So then how come you give this as justification while being quite happy with the fact you are still allowed to post?
Answer that without re-directing it somewhere else, and ill leave it there.
As I have pmed you Philip go cry somewhere else.
This is not about Natman Blue but all about yourself.
So you pm me to say "stop crying" and think that covers it, while you are crying about Natman blue doing exactly what you did.![]()
Yet happy to ban or back the banning of someone else for doing the same thing you did but to a far milder degree.
(And still refusing to face up to your actions).
You are making yourself look very silly indeed.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:46 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:48 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Hes gone down in my estimations on this thread.
Perfect opportunity to hold his hands up after being banged to rights.
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:49 am
TripleD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Hes gone down in my estimations on this thread.
Perfect opportunity to hold his hands up after being banged to rights.
...wait for the "I don't care where I am in your estimations" post..
Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:51 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:02 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:22 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:28 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:33 am
Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:35 am
Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:36 am
Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:37 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Natman is a prostitute?
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:38 am
maccydee wrote:Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Your (sic) gonna be banned soon. Or are you Natman too?
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:39 am
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:39 am
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Natman is a prostitute?
Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:41 am
Aramore wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Paulinho wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:WOW I had no idea starting this thread would cause so much hassle, have to see i I can think of another one now![]()
People! Natman is telling the truth! Someone told him pm was being read, and i know this for a fact, because it was me!
Natman can prove this and defend his statements by posting my messages. And i dont think it fair on the lad accusing him of soliciting and personal abuse on Annis when he can not defend himself.
I MADE THE ACCUSATION; NOT NATMAN!
Natman is a prostitute?
Banned for accusation.