Banning members

Natman shouldn't be banned for loving the red, but he's just a massive hypocrite.

Moans that nobody takes his red view seriously, yet the other day suggested anyone protesting is not real supporter of this club & he's a better one.

3 Our Fathers and 5 Hail Marys for slander, Barry.

Natman shouldn't be banned for loving the red, but he's just a massive hypocrite.

Moans that nobody takes his red view seriously, yet the other day suggested anyone protesting is not real supporter of this club & he's a better one.

Still making things up are we!

Barry

Still making things up are we!

Barry

Definitely not. I've even got a quote for you.

You've claimed you're a "truer" fan for accepting the rebrand and tan.

How about you do? I've been here since this board was set up. I'm a truer fan and user of this board than you so why don't you disappear???

& despite saying you didn't say it, here's you claiming Jesus would be appalled at people standing up to Tan.

what would jesus think of tan's behaviour? I dont know because I've seen hus behaviour despite however much fans claim they do. What woukd jesus think of our behaviour? I think he'd be appalled.

:D why am I being brought into this?

I just offer a viewpoint from the sensible area of the mind often not tapped into by blinkered fans or indeed biased rivals. Im neither. My posts are always backed up by fact or detailed thoughts, dont name call (if i can resist) and am quite an innovative thinker.

Im an asset, no matter what others like to say or tell you

I think what he is saying is that you generate the hits and hits equals more income for the boards owner.

I just point out the agendas and ill behaviour without necessarily generating the hits (although done some good work the last few days). Hence why we are more likely to get banned than you. After all, its all about the money!

Why is it all about the money when the owner of the board has earned more in his life than any of us on here?

wouldnt be too sure of that

Now here are two agendas with the same target but being executed in a different way. The agendas are too belittle this board but the executions are totally different:

why on earth would I want to belittle the board? This board is great and have often told those on planetswans that this board is excellent and Annis is a far better site owner than Phil Sumbler, truly mean it too

1. I would say RM execution is a lot more clever than NB. RM takes an opportunity, draws out the facts that will support his argument but deliberately pushes aside those articles that go against his plan.

like what? I give my opinion and back it up - if I dont take on a counter argument, it is generally because I dont agree with it, why would you ban me for that? as you know, i often end up being right anyway.

2. NB just basically goes on and on in the hope that he will convince others. Generally one or two will join in with him, usually the same one or two, resulting in them flooding the board and boring the rest of us.

cant comment on this, don't know enough about the situation, although i dont think anyone should be banned unless they are deliberately acting a plank which im not sure Natman does in fairness to him.

The fact that you quote in red is enough.

Annis and Phil are good guys.

Quoting in red isnt belittling the board Ian.

Annis is a fine gentleman. Phil is an arrogant idiot who is way above his station and told him as much several times.

Facts.

Still making things up are we!

Barry

Definitely not. I've even got a quote for you.

You've claimed you're a "truer" fan for accepting the rebrand and tan.

How about you do? I've been here since this board was set up. I'm a truer fan and user of this board than you so why don't you disappear???

& despite saying you didn't say it, here's you claiming Jesus would be appalled at people standing up to Tan.

what would jesus think of tan's behaviour? I dont know because I've seen hus behaviour despite however much fans claim they do. What woukd jesus think of our behaviour? I think he'd be appalled.

Yep, still making things up!

Barry

Yep, still making things up!

Barry

Ive quoted you saying it.

You said it too:

Jesus would be appalled at people standing up to Tan.

Ahh, see, you agree with me!

I got banned recently for making a joke. It was clearly a joke but the guy it was aimed at thought I was serious, there we are

I think it would be better if mods could ban people for like a week or so to let them cool off, then they can return. Rather than banning people completely for minor offences.

I got banned recently for making a joke. It was clearly a joke but the guy it was aimed at thought I was serious, there we are

I think it would be better if mods could ban people for like a week or so to let them cool off, then they can return. Rather than banning people completely for minor offences.

Well have been drawn to a closer look at this, its not about minor offences is it? It actually back up evidence of manipulating the views on the board. And i dont think it has anything to do with money, but shocking this is, and a mocking that people cant think for them self really.

You said it too:

Jesus would be appalled at people standing up to Tan.

Ahh, see, you agree with me!

We know that's nonsense as I don't care for make believe characters.

Last edited by Barry Chuckle on Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

I got banned recently for making a joke. It was clearly a joke but the guy it was aimed at thought I was serious, there we are

I think it would be better if mods could ban people for like a week or so to let them cool off, then they can return. Rather than banning people completely for minor offences.

Everyone has different thresholds.

T&C's are guidelines not fast and set rules.

I got banned recently for making a joke. It was clearly a joke but the guy it was aimed at thought I was serious, there we are

I think it would be better if mods could ban people for like a week or so to let them cool off, then they can return. Rather than banning people completely for minor offences.

Everyone has different thresholds.

T&C's are guidelines not fast and set rules.

well some of the thresholds are ridiculously low! i've said it a few times but this thread and poll show that something is not right.

i personally think any banning should come with an accompanying explanation just so people arent getting banned just for rubbing someone up the wrong way or having a different opinion

I got banned recently for making a joke. It was clearly a joke but the guy it was aimed at thought I was serious, there we are

I think it would be better if mods could ban people for like a week or so to let them cool off, then they can return. Rather than banning people completely for minor offences.

Everyone has different thresholds.

T&C's are guidelines not fast and set rules.

So what you are saying, when someone makes a genral muppet insult, not aimed directly, he violates the boards threshold.
But when a direct, reported insult ( i wont even repeat it, it posted back in the thread) that is within both the T&C and the general view of threshold? In fact, the mods follow up these insults by mocking the same person abused in the first place.
And then claim some are belittling the board?

Anyone else getting bored with these guys?

Anyone else getting bored with these guys?

Yes, probably one and the same.

PTB Ian.

Anyone else getting bored with these guys?

Great show of character

Anyone else getting bored with these guys?

if "these guys" were other mods or certain posters you'd have got banned for that

but seriously though this has become a 4 pager so its obvious that a lot of people have been banned for no reason or explanation and its fair to say that is unfair, i think you probably agree but if you do so publicly you'll get your mod status taken away or worse still..banned

Anyone else getting bored with these guys?

if "these guys" were other mods or certain posters you'd have got banned for that

but seriously though this has become a 4 pager so its obvious that a lot of people have been banned for no reason or explanation and its fair to say that is unfair, i think you probably agree but if you do so publicly you'll get your mod status taken away or worse still..banned

Guess he can't answer it then! His question dodging tactic are on a par with Annis to be fair

Guess he can't answer it then! His question dodging tactic are on a par with Annis to be fair

Massive hypocrisy alert. You've avoided a question TWICE in another thread.

Guess he can't answer it then! His question dodging tactic are on a par with Annis to be fair

Massive hypocrisy alert. You've avoided a question TWICE in another thread.

Nope, I've answered it for you about 20 times before. Just not bothering to go over it again!

You said it too:

Jesus would be appalled at people standing up to Tan.

Ahh, see, you agree with me!

We know that's nonsense as I don't care for make believe characters.

No, you've said it. Look, I've directly quoted you so it must be true!!!

Glad to see you agree with me

Why not post the full sentence eh?

You said it too:

Jesus would be appalled at people standing up to Tan.

Ahh, see, you agree with me!

We know that's nonsense as I don't care for make believe characters.

Now Now Chuckles . Which F1 driver was it you met, and where Alex. Simple ?.

Last edited by Grumpyguts on Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Guess he can't answer it then! His question dodging tactic are on a par with Annis to be fair

Massive hypocrisy alert. You've avoided a question TWICE in another thread.

Nope, I've answered it for you about 20 times before. Just not bothering to go over it again!

You haven't answered it once, not even in the original thread.

Guess he can't answer it then! His question dodging tactic are on a par with Annis to be fair

Massive hypocrisy alert. You've avoided a question TWICE in another thread.

Nope, I've answered it for you about 20 times before. Just not bothering to go over it again!

You haven't answered it once, not even in the original thread.

what was the question?

I think the rebrand is attracting fans that can think for them self, and is catching the board off guard, not used to the fact. Certainly not speaking up well, im off walking my dogs, enjoy your day friends

I think the rebrand is attracting fans that can think for them self, and is catching the board off guard, not used to the fact. Certainly not speaking up well, im off walking my dogs, enjoy your day friends

not sure if the rebrand itself has attracted any fans tbh

prem football has though...all sorts, those who can think for themselves and those that cant think at all

Natman & Chuckles show. Natters dont worry he will vanish before you get an answer his intellect reaches its limits fairly quickly you will find.