Sun Dec 29, 2013 8:38 pm
Sun Dec 29, 2013 8:41 pm
Sun Dec 29, 2013 8:44 pm
PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
Sun Dec 29, 2013 8:52 pm
Sun Dec 29, 2013 8:55 pm
toshacks_1_tales wrote:It shows intent and ambition. A progressive club is a club that will attract high quality players, coaching staff and investment. All good in my book. 'Build it and they will come'
Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:12 pm
toshacks_1_tales wrote:It shows intent and ambition. A progressive club is a club that will attract high quality players, coaching staff and investment. All good in my book. 'Build it and they will come'
Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:49 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
Sun Dec 29, 2013 10:54 pm
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:01 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Before this gets turned into a mud slinging match between Cardiff and Swansea fans I want to point out that until we sell out for consecutive seasons why would we expand? Makes no sense. I can't see us getting more than 20k regularly if we go down.
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:15 pm
NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:17 pm
Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
No, just better than you
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:22 pm
NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
No, just better than you
The league table suggests otherwise
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:25 pm
Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
No, just better than you
The league table suggests otherwise
Our last 2 league matches suggest we are, won at home and at your rented small ground
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:27 pm
NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
No, just better than you
The league table suggests otherwise
Our last 2 league matches suggest we are, won at home and at your rented small ground
Completely flawed thinking but that's not surprising. Straws. Clutching etc.
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:29 pm
Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
No, just better than you
The league table suggests otherwise
Our last 2 league matches suggest we are, won at home and at your rented small ground
Completely flawed thinking but that's not surprising. Straws. Clutching etc.
Just plain facts 1-0 both times
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:33 pm
NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
No, just better than you
The league table suggests otherwise
Our last 2 league matches suggest we are, won at home and at your rented small ground
Completely flawed thinking but that's not surprising. Straws. Clutching etc.
Just plain facts 1-0 both times
So by that method Peterborough are better than you
Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:35 pm
Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Caerphillyblue1927 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
No, just better than you
The league table suggests otherwise
Our last 2 league matches suggest we are, won at home and at your rented small ground
Completely flawed thinking but that's not surprising. Straws. Clutching etc.
Just plain facts 1-0 both times
So by that method Peterborough are better than you
If you like, still makes us better than you though
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:20 am
NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:22 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:PremierJacks wrote:
But better than your club both on and off the field. That's what really gets to you. Because you know it's true
The last fixture played between us suggests otherwise.
So you're better than Man City then?
The gap between us and Man City suggests otherwise, whilst there's not much of a gap in the league between us.
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:22 am
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:26 am
NJ73 wrote:
There's a gap, that's what matters Baz.
Only a fool would deny that we're better both on the pitch overall, and off the pitch.
And you're not a fool
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:26 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:There's only one person clutching at straws here... NJ.
As my signature suggests, the Jacks thought they were clearly much better than us & would have "no problem" beating us...
How wrong they were...
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:29 am
NJ73 wrote:
Yep, anything can happen in one off games as you proved v Man City and had been proven time and time again over the years by many underdogs raising their game.
The true test though is league position as I'm sure you'll agree
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:30 am
NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:There's only one person clutching at straws here... NJ.
As my signature suggests, the Jacks thought they were clearly much better than us & would have "no problem" beating us...
How wrong they were...
Yep, anything can happen in one off games as you proved v Man City and had been proven time and time again over the years by many underdogs raising their game.
The true test though is league position as I'm sure you'll agree
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:31 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:NJ73 wrote:
Yep, anything can happen in one off games as you proved v Man City and had been proven time and time again over the years by many underdogs raising their game.
The true test though is league position as I'm sure you'll agree
Correct, which is why we cannot claim to be better than Manchester City. The closeness in our teams performances though, make it much more accurate way of comparing.
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:32 am
NJ73 wrote:
Fell free to consider yourself close to us, you should be considering the money you've spent. Just be aware you're inferior![]()
Unless you consider Palace to be better than you of course

Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:33 am
pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:There's only one person clutching at straws here... NJ.
As my signature suggests, the Jacks thought they were clearly much better than us & would have "no problem" beating us...
How wrong they were...
Yep, anything can happen in one off games as you proved v Man City and had been proven time and time again over the years by many underdogs raising their game.
The true test though is league position as I'm sure you'll agree
nj you are right you are better on and off field but thats no garauntee of safety in any league! also that situation may not last, as if we had won we would be 1point behind you? give us couple seasons like you and sure things could be lot different as we do have room to improve, at moment you are not excactly on the up form wise!
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:34 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:NJ73 wrote:
Fell free to consider yourself close to us, you should be considering the money you've spent. Just be aware you're inferior![]()
Unless you consider Palace to be better than you of course
So inferior that we beat you.![]()
"Tearing up premier league defences" - except in Cardiff, obviously.
Keep clutching at those straws. You appear more bitter than normal tonight.
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:36 am
NJ73 wrote:What an earth have I got to be bitter about?![]()
Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:36 am
NJ73 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:There's only one person clutching at straws here... NJ.
As my signature suggests, the Jacks thought they were clearly much better than us & would have "no problem" beating us...
How wrong they were...
Yep, anything can happen in one off games as you proved v Man City and had been proven time and time again over the years by many underdogs raising their game.
The true test though is league position as I'm sure you'll agree
nj you are right you are better on and off field but thats no garauntee of safety in any league! also that situation may not last, as if we had won we would be 1point behind you? give us couple seasons like you and sure things could be lot different as we do have room to improve, at moment you are not excactly on the up form wise!
And if we hadn't been in Europe this season we'd be better off than we are now Al. C'est la vie.
I wouldn't swap it though