Chelsea first goal

Cardiff to approach Riley Cardiff City, Last updated: Cardiff City are to seek an official explanation as to why Chelsea's equaliser was allowed to stand on Saturday.

Read more at: http://www.clubcall.com/cardiff-city/ca ... 51876.html?

Cardiff to approach Riley Cardiff City, Last updated: Cardiff City are to seek an official explanation as to why Chelsea's equaliser was allowed to stand on Saturday.

Read more at: http://www.clubcall.com/cardiff-city/ca ... 51876.html?

One conclusion you can draw on is the officials new keeper saw player and thought he wouldn't bounce ball so must have dropped it! Anything else means they don't no rules or wasn't watching game! As a blind man can see he bounced ball.

Two points about this goal
1 - Marshall should not have been on the field at the time of the goal as he handled deliberately outside the area (automatic red card)
2 - ball was clearly out of Marshall's hands when Eto'o made contact with it - therefore a goal
STOP BLEATING

Marshall caught the ball on the line. Watched it in slo mo and paused it. He takes it in his midriff as he leans back. Feet outside but ball on the line, certainly too close for officials to call it outside...just like the spurs keeper against us, That WAS marginally outside but again you can't blame the officials for missing it as it was too close to call.

Regarding Chelsea's first goal it was outside the laws of the game for two reasons. Marshall was in control of the ball. He is allowed to bounce the ball without being challenged. Eto'o was laying in an offside position when Hazard's shot hit him.

Two points about this goal
1 - Marshall should not have been on the field at the time of the goal as he handled deliberately outside the area (automatic red card)
2 - ball was clearly out of Marshall's hands when Eto'o made contact with it - therefore a goal
STOP BLEATING

Marshall caught the ball on the line. Watched it in slo mo and paused it. He takes it in his midriff as he leans back. Feet outside but ball on the line, certainly too close for officials to call it outside...just like the spurs keeper against us, That WAS marginally outside but again you can't blame the officials for missing it as it was too close to call.

Regarding Chelsea's first goal it was outside the laws of the game for two reasons. Marshall was in control of the ball. He is allowed to bounce the ball without being challenged. Eto'o was laying in an offside position when Hazard's shot hit him.

the problem with your second point there though, although Eto'o WAS offside, he was only on the floor because he was fouled by Medel, if the ball hadnt dropped to Hazard thats a penalty in my eyes.

Two points about this goal
1 - Marshall should not have been on the field at the time of the goal as he handled deliberately outside the area (automatic red card)
2 - ball was clearly out of Marshall's hands when Eto'o made contact with it - therefore a goal
STOP BLEATING

Marshall caught the ball on the line. Watched it in slo mo and paused it. He takes it in his midriff as he leans back. Feet outside but ball on the line, certainly too close for officials to call it outside...just like the spurs keeper against us, That WAS marginally outside but again you can't blame the officials for missing it as it was too close to call.

Regarding Chelsea's first goal it was outside the laws of the game for two reasons. Marshall was in control of the ball. He is allowed to bounce the ball without being challenged. Eto'o was laying in an offside position when Hazard's shot hit him.

the problem with your second point there though, although Eto'o WAS offside, he was only on the floor because he was fouled by Medel, if the ball hadnt dropped to Hazard thats a penalty in my eyes.

Medel's challenge looked a fair shoulder barge to me. I would have been fuming if a free kick was given against me for that sort of challenge when I was playing anyway! Look at it again and Medel gets his body across Eto'o and the first contact is shoulder to shoulder. It looked an aggressive shoulder barge, but a shoulder barge none the less. If Eto'o had used his body to shoulder barge Medel back to shield the ball, he wouldn't have been knocked down.

Two points about this goal
1 - Marshall should not have been on the field at the time of the goal as he handled deliberately outside the area (automatic red card)
2 - ball was clearly out of Marshall's hands when Eto'o made contact with it - therefore a goal
STOP BLEATING

Marshall caught the ball on the line. Watched it in slo mo and paused it. He takes it in his midriff as he leans back. Feet outside but ball on the line, certainly too close for officials to call it outside...just like the spurs keeper against us, That WAS marginally outside but again you can't blame the officials for missing it as it was too close to call.

Regarding Chelsea's first goal it was outside the laws of the game for two reasons. Marshall was in control of the ball. He is allowed to bounce the ball without being challenged. Eto'o was laying in an offside position when Hazard's shot hit him.

the problem with your second point there though, although Eto'o WAS offside, he was only on the floor because he was fouled by Medel, if the ball hadnt dropped to Hazard thats a penalty in my eyes.

Ive tried explaining this already but apparently its because im bitter

How anyone can label that a fair shoulder challenge indeed frightens me to the core.

Two points about this goal
1 - Marshall should not have been on the field at the time of the goal as he handled deliberately outside the area (automatic red card)
2 - ball was clearly out of Marshall's hands when Eto'o made contact with it - therefore a goal
STOP BLEATING

Marshall caught the ball on the line. Watched it in slo mo and paused it. He takes it in his midriff as he leans back. Feet outside but ball on the line, certainly too close for officials to call it outside...just like the spurs keeper against us, That WAS marginally outside but again you can't blame the officials for missing it as it was too close to call.

Regarding Chelsea's first goal it was outside the laws of the game for two reasons. Marshall was in control of the ball. He is allowed to bounce the ball without being challenged. Eto'o was laying in an offside position when Hazard's shot hit him.

the problem with your second point there though, although Eto'o WAS offside, he was only on the floor because he was fouled by Medel, if the ball hadnt dropped to Hazard thats a penalty in my eyes.

Ive tried explaining this already but apparently its because im bitter

How anyone can label that a fair shoulder challenge indeed frightens me to the core.

Pussy

Two points about this goal
1 - Marshall should not have been on the field at the time of the goal as he handled deliberately outside the area (automatic red card)
2 - ball was clearly out of Marshall's hands when Eto'o made contact with it - therefore a goal
STOP BLEATING

Shocking knowledge here. If it was a handball that is not an automatic red card. Point 2 has been done to death pretty much everywhere.