Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:38 pm

SBF1 wrote:
Magadan wrote:The £4m was based on an interview with his agent that the damned yank posted on another thread. £2.25m with add ons making it up to £4m. There is no reason his agent would lie.

This was after The daily mail whom city gent describes as "spot on with cardiff transfers" claimed we pulled out of the deal because WBA wanted £4m


Okay, okay, we all agree with you FFS! :laughing6: :thumbup: :laughing6:


:lol: have you got the interview of him saying this? sometimes the press aren't always 100% with things by the way. So it's not fact then like you said.

So why did city gent also say you we're blown out of the water on wages if no fee was agreed?

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:42 pm

4 pages and still no actual proof that its 4m including add ons :lol:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:47 pm

Whate ever way u look at it ! Its 4 mil.
Now u can break that down anyway u want! You have paid out 2.5 and there is a ballance of 1.5.
For a 32 year old over 3 years.
Should he be shit an nit get what u hoped for the chances are u are going to play around 3 mil at least as he will gey games.
Now if u think we are jealous and bitter because we decided 3 mil for a 32 year old who has had a few problems then u are realy grasping at straws.
We got a 22 year old who just looked outstanding in the under 21 for spain.
And whats more he is on loan with a option to buy.
Happy days.
Your stuck with yours for 3 years.
Lol

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 3:51 pm

Yes mario another 4 pager from your friendly neighbour hood jack :thumbup:
U love me here I know.
Come on admit it.
Its ok
:wave:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:17 pm

What I would like to know is , that citygent claims that we matched what cardiff offerd! But he decided to move to u :?
Now is this the same citygent whe said somewhere along the lines our academies were not a certing criteria? When it turns out they were.
Ps was well documented that your new super star player wanted to come to swansea (as was allso posted on this board)
So if we did match the ridiculous asking price u offerd why did he not come?
Citygent is well known for his porkies and anything to get at us.
Truth is uhe talks shit, gets found out , and there for deletes if he dont like.
Sad sad man lol
Lets see if he keeps this up the bull shiting bugger

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:21 pm

SO f*cking WHAT ,who cares what we paid :? It's a Cardiff issue anyway ,nothing to do with the jacks :thumbright:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:24 pm

Xcasual wrote:SO f*cking WHAT ,who cares what we paid :? It's a Cardiff issue anyway ,nothing to do with the jacks :thumbright:


your right.Its not even good banter when theyre facts arent even correct. Cant understand why they are so obsessed. Its reached a new level after weve proven we can compete in the premier league

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:25 pm

SL69 wrote:What I would like to know is , that citygent claims that we matched what cardiff offerd! But he decided to move to u :?
Now is this the same citygent whe said somewhere along the lines our academies were not a certing criteria? When it turns out they were.
Ps was well documented that your new super star player wanted to come to swansea (as was allso posted on this board)
So if we did match the ridiculous asking price u offerd why did he not come?
Citygent is well known for his porkies and anything to get at us.
Truth is uhe talks shit, gets found out , and there for deletes if he dont like.
Sad sad man lol
Lets see if he keeps this up the bull shiting bugger


He probably deletes it because you resort to childish name calling when you get confused

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:31 pm

What slags us off wile talking shit .
Gets found out then deleting starts?

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:38 pm

Lay off the smack Paul ffs :lol:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:39 pm

I seem quite popular on this thread. I'm not quite sure what they're talking about but have just managed to make out CITY GENT written over and over

The rest though has gone over my head. My son has just started year 3 in primary school and has already got a better grasp on the English language than this shocking mess above..

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:52 pm

Shut up you weird little c**t

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:02 pm

CityGent wrote:I seem quite popular on this thread. I'm not quite sure what they're talking about but have just managed to make out CITY GENT written over and over

The rest though has gone over my head. My son has just started year 3 in primary school and has already got a better grasp on the English language than this shocking mess above..


:lol:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:03 pm

As the old saying goes! If you have to resort to abuse ot violents.
Then you have allread lost.

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:04 pm

Violence sory

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:05 pm

Before the grammar kids get in there.

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:05 pm

SL69 wrote:As the old saying goes! If you have to resort to abuse ot violents.
Then you have allread lost.


WHAT?

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:06 pm

SL69 wrote:As the old saying goes! If you have to resort to abuse ot violents.
Then you have allread lost.


That's easy for you to say mate

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:07 pm

SL69 wrote:Before the grammar kids get in there.


It's not grammar that's the problem you fuckwit, it's the English language. You're either an alcoholic or a child. Either way you look like a mug, shape up or ship out.

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:09 pm

CityGent wrote:I seem quite popular on this thread. I'm not quite sure what they're talking about but have just managed to make out CITY GENT written over and over

The rest though has gone over my head. My son has just started year 3 in primary school and has already got a better grasp on the English language than this shocking mess above..


You know you are as thick as shit when even your spellchecker can't work out what your trying to type in order to correct it. Based on his mumbo-jumbo, I would imagine that SL69's finished work as a plasterer resembles a mud hut built by an old Matabubu tribeswoman. My old cat sicks up furballs with higher IQ's than this desperately lonely Obsessed sad clown.

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:12 pm

You could work for the Evening Post.


Selling them. ;)

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:13 pm

Welshcake wrote:
SL69 wrote:Before the grammar kids get in there.


It's not grammar that's the problem you fuckwit, it's the English language. You're either an alcoholic or a child. Either way you look like a mug, shape up or ship out.


I reckon it's Roathie again. Instead of pretending to be a Cardiff fan, this time he's pretending to be a Swansea fan who is in convalescence after a particularly serious car crash

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:21 pm

Ccfc Shane wrote:
SL69 wrote:In the paper, reports say u spent 4mill on your new striker with a 3 year deal :?and he is 32 .
We bid 1.8 because of his age but both u and stoke started bidding .
Great bit of business :lol:


2.5 mill actually, how's that crock of shit Bony doing for 12 million?



12million for Jason Scotland2 :laughing6: :laughing6: :laughing6:

Oh bless he's bitter because they have no money left for a decent striker and have to borrow a Spanish parks player with 14 goals in 90 games :laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

Never mind some will be happy if you make a profit :thumbup:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:31 pm

Blah blah bleugh blah bleugh googie googie goo

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:32 pm

I read this:-

Whate ever way u look at it ! Its 4 mil.
Now u can break that down anyway u want! You have paid out 2.5 and there is a ballance of 1.5.
For a 32 year old over 3 years.
Should he be shit an nit get what u hoped for the chances are u are going to play around 3 mil at least as he will gey games.
Now if u think we are jealous and bitter because we decided 3 mil for a 32 year old who has had a few problems then u are realy grasping at straws.
We got a 22 year old who just looked outstanding in the under 21 for spain.
And whats more he is on loan with a option to buy.
Happy days.
Your stuck with yours for 3 years.
Lol


And thought to myself:-

Image

I find it astonishing that there are jacks on here trying to argue that we've paid an excess of £4Mill. because that is the amount quoted to Swansea. The most accurate info i came across was on Sky stating that WB were looking at around £3mill. for Odemwingie. Good bit of business by Malky once more & the Jacks are throwing the toys all over the place :laughing6:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:38 pm

Face facts ladies.
Your new signing is a panic buy, at 4mil even stoke pulled out ffs.
You have been turned down by so many player that mm had run out of options.
And after just 1 shot on goal against everton at home, it was clear you needed someone in with pace.
So as I have said! Nothing more then a panic buy because mm had run out of options.

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:40 pm

SL69 wrote:Face facts ladies.
Your new signing is a panic buy, at 4mil even stoke pulled out ffs.
You have been turned down by so many player that mm had run out of options.
And after just 1 shot on goal against everton at home, it was clear you needed someone in with pace.
So as I have said! Nothing more then a panic buy because mm had run out of options.


I love how these are "facts".

Here's some ACTUAL facts for you Paul.

We've signed an experienced premiership footballer, who was won player of the month awards and has a 1 in 3 strike record.

You've signed a youngster on loan, no prem experience, poor goal ratio.. Very poor infact & also signed him on deadline day...

Which makes him a panic buy, just like you say ours is.

:thumbup: know which one I'd prefer

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:44 pm

So funny that jacks like the retard SL69 are coming across. They scream until they are blue in the face (no pun) how they aren't bitter then make up their own transfer fee and term to make out they didn't really want odemwingie anyway. Pathetic :laughing6:

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:44 pm

SL69 wrote:Face facts ladies.
Your new signing is a panic buy, at 4mil even stoke pulled out ffs.
You have been turned down by so many player that mm had run out of options.
And after just 1 shot on goal against everton at home, it was clear you needed someone in with pace.
So as I have said! Nothing more then a panic buy because mm had run out of options.



Image

Re: Surely not?

Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:46 pm

SL69 wrote:Face facts ladies.
Your new signing is a panic buy, at 4mil even stoke pulled out ffs.
You have been turned down by so many player that mm had run out of options.
And after just 1 shot on goal against everton at home, it was clear you needed someone in with pace.
So as I have said! Nothing more then a panic buy because mm had run out of options.


Fact - you wanted him, couldn't afford him. End of.