Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:29 pm
Jinks wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Jinks wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Same old jinks avoiding answering. You can not say 100percent he DID NOT have anything to do with signings so again ......what's his role???? What did get get for wiping out all the debt? ?
Lots of mocking going on yet NOT ONE answer just joke replys that he got nothing or side tracking to avoid what I've asked. Take the blindfolds off people or better still go stick money in something and get nothing back seems your such good people.
Can you say 100% Sam was behind the signings?
Are you saying that these signings would not have been made if Sam wasn't here?
Annis posted that your thread was deleted because of daya and if you wanted you could post it again and you did![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ok I'm asnwering you once more but please reply to what I'm asking YOU.
Can you say that your 100 percent sure he had nothing to do with helping MM get players in, I mean the last two signings was much better than a league of wales striker and a brentford GK was they not much better name players jinks. I didn't see players like this in the bigger name que before sam come.
On your second part of your post annis did say in another thread that daya had ruined the thread and I should post it again yet I replyed with a NO. So you will have to ask annis why he put a quote up and started this thread.
Again jinks.
What is sams role at the club?
What did he get in return for wiping out all the debt? other than this supposed (life president role) nobody knows what that is mind.
I won't ask again as its taken five replys now yet answering all you have asked me but you can not reply in the same manner to questions only avoid them
You have avoided my questions..
Can you say 100% Sam was the reason we made these signings? YES OR NO?
Are you saying that these signings would not have been made if Sam wasn't here? YES OR NO?
Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:36 pm
mikey h wrote:My first post on this board and sadly it might upset the OP.
That Sam Hammam has come back and 'rescued' this clubs transfer market dealings with his 'knowledge of the game' has to be the silliest, seriously my friend, the silliest thing i have ever read.
Because you said its silly it must be true then just my opinion vs yours
When he was at Wimbledon, Hammam was not dealing at the higher levels in the transfer market. He was dealing with a close-knit club that were NOT famous for spending big or attracting big players ever.
Whats wimbledon got to do with his role at our club now
When he was here, the same was the case, and we were not attracting big name playeerrs - in fact we were continually 'used' by agents and players to get interest from other clubs. We could not attract big name players, certainly not big-name players that had anything left in the tank.
Funny because we was getting hcmapionship players down to div two from what i remember we also clinbed leagues with such players how else was we supposed to do it
That Sam Hammam has lent his 'expertise' in the signing of Cornelius or Medel (its unlikely either will even have heard of him) is daft. Caulker didnt come here because Sam was 'in the background making the right noises' and neither did Brayford.
Well they didnt sign before he come back so whos to say he had nothing to do with it as they wasnt in the quee before he come
Sam nearly took this club to the wall - in fact he tried to ruin us- so its difficult to see that his 'expertise in the game' made this club attractive to anyone.
Most owners do when they want money back after leaving the current one will be no diffrent when he goes he will want his cake back no matter what we think of him then
His record is Wimbledon - enough said, and Cardiff City - lucky escape from the wall.
Without him or the current owner we wouldnt be were we are today this si an 100% fact
Sam Hammam has no influence whatsoever at the club, none at all. If you think a billionaire from Malaysia who got this club promoted, got us a great manager and a great promotion winning squad, is suddenly going to turn to Sam for advice, youre deluded.
That explains why hes back at the club then just for the fun of it so tan and everyone else must be deluded then
Sam Hammam is yesterdays news, for gods sake look to the future man.
Hes not though hes here rite now Tan made sure of that and the furture is what its all about the issue has been solved nobody is saying anything diffrent about the future
Unless you ARE Sam.
Yes its me you got me
Sorry, crap first post but it had to be said! I thought it was a good post tbh![]()
Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:45 pm
Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:45 pm
Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:49 pm
bluebird1972 wrote:I believe tan wiped the Langston's debt by paying them off and not Sam as he is not financially connected to langstone
Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:00 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:I believe tan wiped the Langston's debt by paying them off and not Sam as he is not financially connected to langstone
Maybe and no doubt the rabbit hole gets deeper but why give him a title then or put a guy on the board elected by sam if he had no financial connection with langston
Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:18 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:mikey h wrote:My first post on this board and sadly it might upset the OP.
That Sam Hammam has come back and 'rescued' this clubs transfer market dealings with his 'knowledge of the game' has to be the silliest, seriously my friend, the silliest thing i have ever read.
Because you said its silly it must be true then just my opinion vs yours
When he was at Wimbledon, Hammam was not dealing at the higher levels in the transfer market. He was dealing with a close-knit club that were NOT famous for spending big or attracting big players ever.
Whats wimbledon got to do with his role at our club now
When he was here, the same was the case, and we were not attracting big name playeerrs - in fact we were continually 'used' by agents and players to get interest from other clubs. We could not attract big name players, certainly not big-name players that had anything left in the tank.
Funny because we was getting hcmapionship players down to div two from what i remember we also clinbed leagues with such players how else was we supposed to do it
That Sam Hammam has lent his 'expertise' in the signing of Cornelius or Medel (its unlikely either will even have heard of him) is daft. Caulker didnt come here because Sam was 'in the background making the right noises' and neither did Brayford.
Well they didnt sign before he come back so whos to say he had nothing to do with it as they wasnt in the quee before he come
Sam nearly took this club to the wall - in fact he tried to ruin us- so its difficult to see that his 'expertise in the game' made this club attractive to anyone.
Most owners do when they want money back after leaving the current one will be no diffrent when he goes he will want his cake back no matter what we think of him then
His record is Wimbledon - enough said, and Cardiff City - lucky escape from the wall.
Without him or the current owner we wouldnt be were we are today this si an 100% fact
Sam Hammam has no influence whatsoever at the club, none at all. If you think a billionaire from Malaysia who got this club promoted, got us a great manager and a great promotion winning squad, is suddenly going to turn to Sam for advice, youre deluded.
That explains why hes back at the club then just for the fun of it so tan and everyone else must be deluded then
Sam Hammam is yesterdays news, for gods sake look to the future man.
Hes not though hes here rite now Tan made sure of that and the furture is what its all about the issue has been solved nobody is saying anything diffrent about the future
Unless you ARE Sam.
Yes its me you got me
Sorry, crap first post but it had to be said! I thought it was a good post tbh![]()
Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:19 pm
bluebird1972 wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:I believe tan wiped the Langston's debt by paying them off and not Sam as he is not financially connected to langstone
Maybe and no doubt the rabbit hole gets deeper but why give him a title then or put a guy on the board elected by sam if he had no financial connection with langston
Not maybe but documented facts, the real reason behind the title will never officially be known imo
Everybody will have a opinion as far as SH is concerned my is hero and villain in equal measures
Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:31 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:I believe tan wiped the Langston's debt by paying them off and not Sam as he is not financially connected to langstone
Maybe and no doubt the rabbit hole gets deeper but why give him a title then or put a guy on the board elected by sam if he had no financial connection with langston
Not maybe but documented facts, the real reason behind the title will never officially be known imo
Everybody will have a opinion as far as SH is concerned my is hero and villain in equal measures
He has been given a title though its documented and been made official. what it intails is more than just a title i know that i mean you would have to be off your rocker to give away millions of pounds for a title of a football club if that title give nothing back.
Hero then the villian thats how it is being a football fan i agree.
The thing is people are so narrow minded to believe anything other than sams got a title and thats it for wiping off all the debt so im asking them who only think this to explain what his role is and what did he get for it all yet nobody can answer me as im only getting abuse and silly replys avoiding it for some diffrent thinking of a situation. Theres more to it than people think imo.
Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:38 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:I believe tan wiped the Langston's debt by paying them off and not Sam as he is not financially connected to langstone
Maybe and no doubt the rabbit hole gets deeper but why give him a title then or put a guy on the board elected by sam if he had no financial connection with langston
Not maybe but documented facts, the real reason behind the title will never officially be known imo
Everybody will have a opinion as far as SH is concerned my is hero and villain in equal measures
He has been given a title though its documented and been made official. what it intails is more than just a title i know that i mean you would have to be off your rocker to give away millions of pounds for a title of a football club if that title give nothing back.
Hero then the villian thats how it is being a football fan i agree.
The thing is people are so narrow minded to believe anything other than sams got a title and thats it for wiping off all the debt so im asking them who only think this to explain what his role is and what did he get for it all yet nobody can answer me as im only getting abuse and silly replys avoiding it for some diffrent thinking of a situation. Theres more to it than people think imo.
Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:55 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:bluebird1972 wrote:I believe tan wiped the Langston's debt by paying them off and not Sam as he is not financially connected to langstone
Maybe and no doubt the rabbit hole gets deeper but why give him a title then or put a guy on the board elected by sam if he had no financial connection with langston
Not maybe but documented facts, the real reason behind the title will never officially be known imo
Everybody will have a opinion as far as SH is concerned my is hero and villain in equal measures
He has been given a title though its documented and been made official. what it intails is more than just a title i know that i mean you would have to be off your rocker to give away millions of pounds for a title of a football club if that title give nothing back.
Hero then the villian thats how it is being a football fan i agree.
The thing is people are so narrow minded to believe anything other than sams got a title and thats it for wiping off all the debt so im asking them who only think this to explain what his role is and what did he get for it all yet nobody can answer me as im only getting abuse and silly replys avoiding it for some diffrent thinking of a situation. Theres more to it than people think imo.
Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:59 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Igovernor wrote:Life president is just an honorary title like VT getting an honorary diploma means piss all, Sam has nothing whatsoever to do with signings, you must be really slow if you think he has, the sooner you stop stirring the better, Sams sycophant
Ok so your saying in a nutshell he got piss all then basically for wiping off all the debt yet its deemed stirring, i wish you was my bank manager i would get money for free as you would want nothing back in return of course
Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:01 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:On my phone so rather crap typo but i still await the FIRST reply to my questions that are baffling people still.
What is sams role at the club?
Maybe,just some form of consultancy
What did sam get for wiping off all the debt bar a supposed your a life president of ccfc title?
Well he probably got the money he craved for!!!
Mind boggling how Tan give sam a little title and sam gave away millions for it in return. Tans a winner i suppose as anything other than this would be stirring or im deluded to think it
Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:05 pm
Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:27 pm
Bluebina wrote:Ignore the fool he's on a wind up, funny last year deals picked up towards the end of the window, Sam has about as much influence on our signings as the drunkun wet span fan
Tue Aug 13, 2013 9:25 pm
Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:53 pm
Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:16 am
Forever Blue wrote:Interesting thread.
It's also interesting that Tan has paid Langston £15 mill, will be paying approximate £9 mill over the coming few years and that Sam has a Director on board, another to follow and Tan spks daily to Sam.
Make of it, what you will. hmm
Malky is his own man.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:17 am
veteranfan wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Interesting thread.
It's also interesting that Tan has paid Langston £15 mill, will be paying approximate £9 mill over the coming few years and that Sam has a Director on board, another to follow and Tan spks daily to Sam.
Make of it, what you will. hmm
It would be interesting if your source wasnt Sam. A High Court Judge pretty much
called Sam a liar, confirming the suspicions of the vast majority of City fans. So to
most of us, any info coming from Sam Hammam is likely fairy stories. I Speak To
Tan Every Day is a throwaway comment you, me nor anyone else could ever prove.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:41 am
Forever Blue wrote:veteranfan wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Interesting thread.
It's also interesting that Tan has paid Langston £15 mill, will be paying approximate £9 mill over the coming few years and that Sam has a Director on board, another to follow and Tan spks daily to Sam.
Make of it, what you will. hmm
It would be interesting if your source wasnt Sam. A High Court Judge pretty much
called Sam a liar, confirming the suspicions of the vast majority of City fans. So to
most of us, any info coming from Sam Hammam is likely fairy stories. I Speak To
Tan Every Day is a throwaway comment you, me nor anyone else could ever prove.
They can call Sam what they like and I've always said my club comes first. But if Sam was so wrong and a liar and a fraud, how come he has just been paid £15 mill, plus much more to come? From a man like Vincent Tan?
The facts are there Sam/Langston got paid.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:15 am
Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:23 am
Ackers wrote:Malky said in a radio interview that he has been after Medal for 9 months. He also told the echo he has tried to get Steve Caulker a number of times but was always out of his reach.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... rs-5445120
Are you calling Malky a liar? Or are you doing a Adrian Durham and saying things controversial to get hits?
Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:24 am
Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:42 am
Forever Blue wrote:Ackers wrote:Malky said in a radio interview that he has been after Medal for 9 months. He also told the echo he has tried to get Steve Caulker a number of times but was always out of his reach.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... rs-5445120
Are you calling Malky a liar? Or are you doing a Adrian Durham and saying things controversial to get hits?
Ackers, Malky is his own man, he looks for the players he wants,Tan tried to push players on Makky before, so Malky never played them.
Malky has his own group of men, I am on about Tan does now talk to Sam on footballing issues daily.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:45 am
Ackers wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Ackers wrote:Malky said in a radio interview that he has been after Medal for 9 months. He also told the echo he has tried to get Steve Caulker a number of times but was always out of his reach.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... rs-5445120
Are you calling Malky a liar? Or are you doing a Adrian Durham and saying things controversial to get hits?
Ackers, Malky is his own man, he looks for the players he wants,Tan tried to push players on Makky before, so Malky never played them.
Malky has his own group of men, I am on about Tan does now talk to Sam on footballing issues daily.
Annis the open post stated that we only signed these players because Sam is here. I was pointing out that I don't think this is true has Malky, himself said he's been after these player for ages.
As for Tan talking to Sam daily. I'am glad he does. Sam has been in football for years and understands football. Tan on the other hand knows FA about football.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:03 am
Forever Blue wrote:
How are you old friend? how is your young family?
Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:08 am
Ackers wrote:Forever Blue wrote:
How are you old friend? how is your young family?
Good thanks Annis. Misses has gone back to work part time now so I look after the little one on my own twice a week. She keeps me on my toes haha. Hope everything is good with you too mate.
Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:25 am